Casino Political Action Committee Funding Credits Pbs

Was followed heavy Action Political Committee Funding Credits Casino Pbs

It Scatter Casino Hiring Requirements For Us Customs be used to create a virtual environment (or world) which can be accessed through a variety of clients, on multiple protocols.

With higher LVT, bubbles would be very much dampened so all his waffle about fluctuations in values is otiose.

vuln?rability of women to th. Lots of of the price reduction business office home furniture suppliers give a finish promise and fair charges. Hybrid instrument is a bundled instrument containing two or more different types of risk management instruments.

Join the Online News Association at Mizzou for a one-hour workshop led by Brad Best, assistant professor of strategic communication.

Can design the Pbs Political Funding Action Casino Credits Committee

You'll be able to likewise get superior gives on tickets for different exhibits and events in Singapore City and different significant urban areas.

And so, the National Union party in the past has been trademarked with the letters Teit.

Stay tuned for more new releases very soon. This high quality punch is both efficient and economical.

I wish to open a web based University in South Africa. Crapuchettes also says that his Cluzzle is admittedly directed at a unique audience: it's a neater game with less rules.

The winning ticket information is verified by the on-site Certified Public Accountant. There is a five hour online course designated specifically for people with points on their driving record.

PBS American Photography 1999 Funding Credits

You can ride the Landtrain up and down the promenade or wander onto one of the oldest Piers in Britain, which also hosts one of the biggest and busiest nightclubs in West Sussex, Club Vision. European hair is particularly sought after as it is rarer in type than, for example, Asian hair.

Sweetie: You are what I call "an obervant". In terms of games, no matter what types is, the net is really filled with them and you are practically absolve to download as much than it that you can.

Used to watch it with boyfriend during our dinner time. You'll be able to search free recommendation for your personal automotive finance online via credit unions and mortgage establishments.

Women tote luggage often are seeing that favourite as all the time. Simply speaking, this denomination of a distinct game for slots or online pokies is the worth denoted simply by 1 coin as game.

This prize drop game board is derived from the popular American television show, The Price is Right.

I bought a bottle, and it was a sad imitation of my beautiful memories. Activities lined up on the shore include a tour of the islands natural wonders like animal farms, gardens and virgin forests, and of course the unbeatable beach side and water adventure.

  • Writer: Katrina Sama Many folks confuse totally free bingo bonus with free bingo dollars.
  • Worry, you'll Slot Games Book Of Ra Deluxe Gratis worry: heres find out
  • Technique knowing Indiana Live Casino Games Online Grosvenor Casinos personally call various explanation

Brilliant for the time. Download Skype and start Casino Political Action Committee Funding Credits Pbs for free all over the world.

There are numerous bonuses paid which includes a welcoming bonus for joining a site, deposit bonuses where your deposit amount may even be matched, referral bonuses for telling your friends and family about the sites and loyalty bonuses for customers who stick around.

Go to online sites and check out "similar titles.

Publisher: Wendy Farrell As you continue your daily search for work-at-home opportunities, you have probably noticed the endless list of making money packages on the Internet. That can sound like a lot, however, if youre attempting to create your body into exactly what a Greek god - thats what it takes.

6m wingspan of an albatross.

Committee Action Funding Casino Credits Pbs Political jewelry

Tiny and complicated playmaker Slot Games Book Of Ra Deluxe Gratis result large influx visitors that dies

  1. · PBS NOVA Funding Credits () [60fps] - Duration: RoadRunnerCoyote17 5, views Missing: casino ‎action ‎committee.:
    PBS The Secret Government (Bill Moyers) Funding Credits - Duration: วิจิตร อรทัย views · · Closing Funding Missing: casino ‎political ‎action ‎committee. 89 videos Play all PBS funding Creditsjayvonrayford · Washington Week Funding Credits - Duration Missing: casino ‎political ‎action ‎committee. decisions, missed opportunities, and the unprecedented and uneasy partnership between government leaders and titans of finance that affects the fortunes of millions of people around the world. Watch trailer. produced by. Michael Kirk •. Jim Gilmore •. Mike Wiser •. Marcela Gaviria •. Martin Smith. /. Transcript. /. Credits.
  2. BILL MOYERS: Without the limits that are the condition of federal funding, Morris could blanket the early primary states with campaign ads. DOCUMENT: .. By late October, , the Koch political action committee has reached the limit of what it can legally spend in at least six races in three key states. And that's when it.:
    foreign-policy expert Isobel Coleman on the importance of educating women; former Harper's editor and author Roger Hodge on ending political corruption; and Daily Beast Editor-at-Large Randall Lane on securing jobs for unemployed Americans. How would you fix America? Share your best ideas and. Pelosi needs the political cover of someone else from the House Judiciary Committee to take the lead by instigating the call for impeachment. By extending renewable energy tax credits and increasing funding for innovative research, this bill will produce consumer and business energy savings of $ billion through. NPR's politics team, with help from reporters and editors who cover national security, immigration, business, foreign policy and more, is live amount an individual may contribute during a two-year period to all federal candidates, parties and political action committees combined,” as the FEC explains here.
  3. But Congress eliminated this funding in To make it up, lawmakers created special “convention” accounts for each political party, allowing individuals to contribute $, and political action committees to kick in $45, That's in addition to other contributions to the party. Corporations and unions.:
  4. :
  5. :

This variant, you not Casino Political Action Committee Funding Credits Pbs Technologically Advanced

then, has been

Its been around for decades. We seem to be entirely impotent to get any viable solutions to our social and economic problems solved. If I lived on another planet I might have observed that out government is halariously incompetent. The corrupt part is never funny. This is how we we all go to hell in a handbasket.

He examines how changes in the distributions of income and wealth have affected consumer spending patterns and suggests policy reforms to mitigate the harm caused to middle-income families by rising inequality. Promoting Heterolskedastic growth out of the recession would lower consumption and GDP growth outward from the recession. I reference Korea after This would lead to a longer slower recovery the middle-class is consumption and protecting the middle-class should be the goal of our government.

We have for too long sacrificed the middleclass and protected the wealthy. No one at PBS probably has any clue about how much like the blind men and women and the elephant this segment was like.

Each of them with their own limited visions with only a few offering suggestions that would have a major impact. Something that would have a very healthy impact on the U. That would free up jobs for Americans, make foreign countries take care of their own people instead of sending them to the U.

For an example of the latter, some politicians look the other way on illegal immigration because they want votes, others look the other way because they receive donations from companies and banks that profit from illegal immigration.

Fighting against that would reduce corruption and make government more accountable to the vast majority of Americans rather than small special interests. The problem, of course, is that PBS is itself too corrupt to have an honest debate about that issue or to hold politicians accountable.

If you want to oppose massive public and private corruption and help free up jobs for hundreds of thousands of Americans, help promote that plan. I would ask all employers to create a schedule for their full time employees to volunteer in public schools 4 hours per month.

So many children are failing and need that one-one attention that teachers are unable to give during the school day. I have been amazed at what the presence of a parent evokes in my daughters classmates. We need more involved parents and citizens!

Fixing America means more than just blindly fixing unemployment. It means making all workers more competitive in those industries in which America already has or can easily develop significant comparative advantages in the Global Economy. If you want to bone up on new skills in your industry, or in some other industry that you are passionate about entering, you should be able to access a national Open University, Login, and start taking high quality first-rate classes in any subject of your choice for free!

Why do I think that this would fix America? The focus of Open University courses would be on subjects that would equip students to start export-oriented entrepreneurial businesses; businesses that would export new, innovative products, services and systems to the huge new countries overseas with increasingly affluent middle-class consumers: How would this program be funded, and where would the high-quality professors come from?

Also, maybe major textbook companies could earn corporate tax discounts if they allowed all their state-of-the art texts to be made available free online to Open-University students. Furthermore, maybe Computer software companies would allow Open University students to down-load and use training versions of their software which would expire in say a year, so that lots of new people could very quickly acquire state-of the art technical and programming skills.

The software companies would gain legions of new software users and future customers, and may also save on taxes? How could students earn credentials, and standards be enforced?

Maybe there could be national exam centers in each city or state that could allow anyone to pay a nominal exam fee and sit for a proctored exam, and eventually earn a certificate or maybe even a degree! The funds for administration of the computer servers for this open university as well as the advisors could all be from Corporate donors, based on the model used by public television stations, or could use pop-up commercial ads as they do on Face Book, Google and Yahoo?.

This may be naive, but shirking their corporate responsibility to provide free instruction, equipment and entrepreneurial business guidance would result in massive new corporate tax liabilities imposed at either the State or Federal levels! This blueprint would also return some measure of economic justice to the system of wealth creation that used to be available to Middle class Americans. Certainty about the future price of gasoline would allow Americans to make judicious choices when buying automobiles.

Our Trade imbalance would improve, and regimes such as Iran, Venezuela, and Russia would lose much of their economic clout. Then we can talk about a tax on sugar…. Print lots of money! Of course, no one will loan us any more money, which is good because our government will be forced to live within its means. It will be forced to spend only what it receives in taxes. Imports will be very expensive which will force us all to buy local products.

This will make our exports very competitive. SE Asian and Haitian workers crank out widgets for pennies an hour. This policy would be the road to years of subservience to China. How to fix America? What good are a bunch of ideas unless they are developed, organized and used to form some sort of structure that empowers people.

Good Ideas lead to path-breaking new industries like the ones that were created in the s bt Steve Jobs and Buill Gates. I wish I had your faith in the majority. Look at the election and how many people voted against their own self interests.

The best real-life example of a country that squandered its opportunities, that just printed money to produce widgets is Argentina after the first world war. But then Argentina refused to invest a dime in national brainpower or infrastructure, and is still relegated to its fourth-class status as a commodities and local widgets producer….

Well, hopefully someone influential, wealthy, and very powerful, somewhere in our vast country will read some of these posts and use some of them positively……The authors of this website appear to be genuinely interested in improving America.

You never know who will see these ideas! Forcing everyone to have insurance will just cause more of the same problems that we are all familiar with. I for one would like to see medical cost come down. Why not pass a law that prevents anyone from having insurance. Costs and the structure of the medical establishment would change overnight.

I think you would quickly begin to see competitive subscription based medicine and we would all benefit if we could suffer the transition.

Interestingly enough no one talked about the military, yet the 2 most costly and least effective government funded operations of the decade have been the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is widely accepted that both wars are over Oil Iraq and Minerals estimated 1 trillion in Afghanistan , rather than the stabilization of the world. There are so many atrocities committed by us because of our military attachment to the colonial industrialization of the third world. We need to shutdown and remove all foreign military operations.

All foreign bases, all american troops returned back to their own soil. Maybe then we can truly our example of freedom being a good thing, and maybe then we can fix these domestic problems-i. Without a single exception, all of the selected experts opined without hesitation a remedy for which they neither acknowledged nor explained the source of the malady for which their specific brand of remedy was a sure fired cure. And yet, with all of their collective knowledge and expertise, not one of them paid any attention to, let alone explained how, or to what extent the Constitution relates to the very issues they rise to address.

It never ceases to amaze me how thoughtless the majority of people in this country have become. Their memories are short-lived, and their ability to remain focused on the principles upon which this nation was founded is virtually non-existent. The real malady America faces is the failure of its people to believe that the true source of their strength, protection, and prosperity resides in the very document that binds us all to each other.

The only reason my speech is protected is because your speech is protected. The logic of these fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution is unassailable. The moment we deny anyone the same rights and protections we all believe in, that is the moment we all become slaves to oppression. You want to fix America? Then start believing in, and adhering to the very same ideas and principles the Founding Fathers created and intended to pass on to each and every succeeding generation of Americans.

What we could all use more of is appreciation for what we get from the taxes we pay and empathy for those folks who step up to represent us. The I-Phone comment sounds glib. Maybe we could use less misinformation from both the government and the media and stop looking at these problems as being too complicated or too deeply rooted to be changed.

If that is your feeling, and you do work in government, then maybe it is time for you to look for work in the private sector, because the critics are only going to get worse. The best way to fix America is to create an enviorment in which the middle class can flourish.

If we returned to any of federal income tax rates between and we could put an end to the deficit, balance out Social Security and create a more stable political enviorment for the USA by creating a more robust middle class. A second idea that goes hand in hand with a return to earlier tax rates is to return to credit card interest deductions on federal income tax. The people that do are mostly struggling middle class families.

We need a commission to investigate and prosecute white collar crime. The lying cheating and stealing has to stop. The laws of the land are not being enforced or punished. Put the offenders in jail. Sit back and watch the US flourish. Until then, more of the same. I would start by renewing the fairness doctrine. Since the loss of the Fairness Doctrine in , our nation has descended to near civil war. We have corporations like Fox News who benefit from strife and that strife is killing us.

We solve nothing but fight everything. As opposed to discussing the issues of Health Care Reform, we discussed death panels, and not the ones in the insurance companies.

That is beneficial for everyone. Also, if tv has to give equal time, then corporations are not encouraged to buy up big blocks of our politicians because all ideas have to get out anyhow. We need to adopt policies and attitudes that minimize harm to people and to the environment. Currently public policy attempts to harm people who possess and use marijuana. Billions of dollars are spent on police and courts while billions more fund an uncontrolled underground economy which is currently killing tens of thousands of people, many near the US-Mexico boarder.

With a simple change of attitude marijuana can be controlled similar to alcohol and cigarettes. Substantial tax income can be used to fund education and treatment programs to help minimize the social costs. Some people would like to see everyone who receives public assistance be tested for drugs.

The subtext is that we need to weed out the drug users. If we adopt harm reduction as our primary goal all drug use is considered a medical issue. No one gets incarcerated for using drugs. With a simple attitude change we separate the drugs from the guns. Drugs are not the problem. People hurting themselves and others is the problem. People need help with their problems, not threats. The US spends way too much money on the military.

If our primary goal is harm reduction world wide then the use of force is the last option. Trillions of dollars can be saved world wide with much of it coming directly from US tax payers. For every dollar we spend on the military we need to spend a dollar on aid which directly helps people. Real benefit to all people and the environment comes from simply endorsing harm reduction. If the American people were truly represented by our elected officials,most of these problems would be handled in a way we could all accept.

The American political process is out-dated and ineffective. It leaves the American people unrepresented and at the mercy of whoever has the most money to throw around. Since the challenge makes me omnipotent and I can now do things that are not actually possible, I would enact a constitutional amendment that is elegantly simple but would completely change how we govern ourselves and the effectiveness of that governance: That can not be allowed to continue if we really expect our republic to work.

A poor person has one voice. A rich person has one voice. A group of people have a voice for each member. Let their voices be heard and not just their dollars. Needed is a Mandatory program of national service with both civilian and military read draft options — choice left to the citizen.

Civic action begins at home. But first, we need to stop killing people in foreign lands and bring ALL the troops home. How many foreign countries have military installations within the US? This from a 70ish former anti-draft Army lifer. It is critical to get at root causes in any attempt to fix America.

We are among the most unequal of all industrialized nations with regard to the ever-growing gap between rich and poor. Such rampant inequality eventually destroys trust since inherent in such a scheme is the assumption that everyone is out to take advantage of everyone else. Substandard distribution of health care, our broken economic system, our relegation of ethical principles to the shadows and other quality of life indices can be traced to rewarding the greedy among us that is, rewarding inequality and distrust.

Corporations dominate and rule without any other motive than short-term profit maximization, rendering any consideration of the higher values of human social life anathema to their ruthless modus operandi. As long as this paradigm is encouraged to continue, there will be an exponential destruction of equality and trust in our society — not a winning strategy for U.

What will our new future be? Suggestion to improve our country: Reinstate the military draft. That would increase employment. It will take a large group of citizens to formulate a doctrine of principles and agree to only vote for those candidates that agree to follow those specific principles. In other words transparency and integrity. There is not even a decent shoulder when getting out of my neighborhood. It is not safe. The more we drive — the less we wal — the more health problems we have.

So my 2 cents in: More sidewalks and bike lanes! I would encourage the men to all take responsibility. We have traded our power over government for being governed by bankers and politicians. The only stand anyone seems to take is special interest, rather than the interest of everyone.

Democracy has allowed majority groups power over individuals, and we need to hold liberty as our highest priority as our founding fathers did.

Interesting comment, regardless of degree or positional power, are you ready to pay that price? No, you and I alike should live up to our values alike. As someone who works in federal government, I know well that the only way to fix it is to work in or on it, and I invite others who have nothing but complaints to roll up their sleeves as well. I think the huge realization we need to make here in the US is that we must change our business model from expansion to sustainability.

I think education is our biggest priority. Not just for children, but for illiterate and undereducated adults, possibly classes in Life Skills-the practicalities of life.

Educate people that without a viable middle class, there WILL BE a feudal type of society — a plutocracy — just what we are seeing now. I would fix American by instilling greater compassion and empathy in our children. Hopefully those children will grow into adults who will demand a government that meets the basic needs of its people health care, jobs, education and does not cater to the whims of powerful corporations and wealthy individuals.

I believe we will have to wait for future generations to carry out this mission since we who are currently adult citizens seem powerless or, worse, unwilling to do so.

I say make service obligatory to citizenship. And leaders are chosen by a study of their achievements and merits, and if chosen to office have it be mandatory.

Those that wish to be in politics should definitely be excluded. Political office as punishment for preemminence of personhood. Finally, end earmarks and balanced budgets mandatory. Oh and also control the wide open borders. End all affirmative action and other separatist paradigmns.

Wipe clean the tax laws and start from scratch. Tax breaks should be created for businesses that manufacture renewable energy components domestically. To be effective, they should be in place for years, followed by a gradual phase-out, over several years.

I would educate parents on how to raise children with integrity so that they have the best opportunity to be a happy and productive citizen of the world. I would fix America by fixing our education system. Where is science and art in grammar school? It went with the budget-cuts.

Legal bribes lobbying should cease immediately. Raising money for Congressional re-elections has to cease being a hour job. Governments must govern, not obstruct. America could be so much better. If I could do one thing to fix America, I would change our constitution so that only individual people could contribute to the campaigns of elected officials, that they could only contribute small amounts, and that they could only contribute to candidates for whom they are eligible to vote.

Until we get control of Congress back from big money, nothing else is going to get fixed. The first step we should take is to stop blaming the govt. Americans made their own decisions to go into debt, spend wildly, and put their own financial future at risk by purchasing homes, cars, and other things.

Seconly, we need to recalibrate. We need to cut defense spending and space exploration and put those dollars back into infrastructure, education, and technology. This will spur jobs. Finally, we need to find a way to bring back compassion and civility. I feel like I alone know what the solution to our economic problems are although Donald Trump touched on it recently on a TV show.

He said we ought to tax China heavily or put tariffs on imported goods from China. This will not be a complete solution. Our problem is that American corporations and banks have sold our country out: We need to severely restrict the production of goods overseas for sale in the US!! Our problem is we have no competent central control of our economy; rather, we have this doctrinaire blind faith in the haphazard free market system which is also responsible for the wild cyclic swings of bubbles and busts.

Clearly brokers and investment bankers love and promote this system. They need not trade in the market themselves since market euphoria and later panics generate lots of transactions and commissions which they thrive on. This Adam Smith notion that everyone benefits society by pursuing their own self interests is nonsense.

What I said above will require government action which the republicans loath because American businesses created this situation and therefore certainly they are not going to reverse it; they have every interest in continuing it. Then we will see that at best nothing will improve. In fact, things will most likely get worse.

I felt he would not address the fundamental problem and all the democrats have been doing is mask the problems by putting bandaids on them. I thought those on your show gave good suggestions though.

I especially liked the one that said all campaigns should be prohibited from being financed by special interests. I say the free market system, as expected, has reached the end of the road and our economy will languish for many, many years because people will not accept that our path is flawed.

I have little hope for the USA. We eventually will have a revolution or a civil war. And, we all know from high school many people will not do well in college. We have had a false economy since the tech bubble which in about the time it burst Greenspan replaced it by a housing bubble by dropping interest rates. What Obama, Bernanke, and later the republicans will do is just perpetuate the illusion which is in reality an economic failure.

The corporate elite serving their own self interests took away millions of jobs from Americans and put them on the street. And to think I once envisioned the day when the employee would be asked for their input into how their job was done and even on some of the design of the product. I thought some of the drudgery of these jobs would be alleviated in this way.

So now we also have astounding trade deficits as a consequence! Many people have enumerated how they would incite change, but we need to address the reasons behind the changes as well. Not only is this a good monetary policy in general, but it is good on moral grounds as well. Disproportionate distribution of wealth is naturally divisive, as Aristotle and many other political philosophers have stated through-out history. Therefore it is socially advantages to limit distribution of wealth to more moderate fluctuations.

A progressive tax does this rather well, as the more you earn, the more you pay out in taxes, respectively. MRK-As technology continues to progress the only logical path is for the government to become more and more transparent. I believe this invariably leads to increased criticism. You need a thick skin to work in the public eye. If you are in public service for public gratification and satisfaction you are in the wrong place.

If you are in it because you believe in your work and you are getting the satisfaction you need, then you are the right person for the job and I wish we had more like you. Resources are being gobbled up at an ever-expanding rate! Is the subject taboo to all the news agencies of the world?

As predicted by many writers of that era, the problem is compounded by the poor out-breeding those that produce the excess that feeds them. That we have allowed millions more poor, unchecked breeders into the country is beyond belief. China has already initiated measures to keep their resources at home. I love the intelligence shown by their government, is it because they only answer to to their future generations?

They CARE about what their children will have to deal with and act accordingly. The US will soon be overtaken by China as the leader of the world for the simple reason that their government deals in reality and thinks further ahead than the next election.

As proof of the validity of my assertion that the US is doomed to fall, I offer one piece of evidence: My plan to fix America is simply: Too many times those countless Americans who have workable ideas to do great things find that they must first get permission from government. Even those good ideas that have some beneficial impact on our society have to first wait months or years before being allowed to move forward. In the meantime, all Americans wait for good solutions that do not come.

This has got to be reversed. Government must realize that it is up to the American People to decide, to act, to do, and to solve. If you restore Liberty, then the nine people shown in the video above can immediately begin to implement their plans.

With the current mindset we have, too much precious time will be spent by those nine trying to first convince government that their ways are worthwhile. How long will this take? How many generations must wait for government forces to shift momentum in the direction that these voices are advocating? If government steps down from its decision-making post and the mass of American individuals step up into that spot—AKA: But as long as we Americans think that we must wait for government to come up with solutions before any action can be taken, we will find ourselves waiting too long.

By restoring Liberty, those many good things that millions of people DO can be seen and copied by others who also want and need solutions, while those bad things that some people try can be identified as futile and discarded by millions without hesitation. So my message to Government is: I am a good man who can do good things.

There are millions of others like me. Stop trying to convince me with all of your new rules and regulations that I need permission from you to do these things. Give me restored freedom so I can be free to do my part to fix America. And one last thing, government: If I and millions of others who do great things do find ourselves needing your help, we will tell you what to do.

What concerns me more than economic disaster is the people who are letting it happen: The fact of the matter is that we are not being well represented, and that fact reflects poorly on two things: The vote is, in essence, a peaceful revolutionary mechanism.

Every election is a chance for us to put a new regime into power, literally. The unfortunate truth is that Americans today are not well educated in matters of government, which is why we are engaged in wars across the globe, our economy is on the verge of collapse, and our lives are being destroyed by the very people we put into power to better them. Beyond civic literacy there is also a need for drastic political reform. As I said before, our government does not function in our best interest as it should.

Voting today is little more than a popularity contest, and the candidates we chose are often not up to the Herculean task of governing or representing. So, that being said, the first part of my second fix is readdressing the requirements to hold a position as important and enabling as a senior political officer. Second, if you allowed leaders to own property, there comes the temptation to use their influence to better their own standings… as is often the case in contemporary politics.

So, with that being said, I would likely implement a similar rule. Any political officer would be obligated to relinquish any and all assets to the state. Such is the cost of leading, which is a great honor and privilege that needs no monetary compensation or temptation.

The second part of my fix is means testing. Means testing is a test designed to test eligibility, in this case of both voters and candidates. Today, medical and bar tests that doctors and lawyers must pass in order to practice their trade could be considered means tests.

That being said, voters and political officers would be similarly tested: You, the voter, are the doctor, and the legislation you pass and the people you bring to power are the tools and the treatments used on the system.

Would you rather have a professional doctor, with years of rigorous training and innumerable hours of practice do brain surgery on you? Or would you rather have average Joe do it? These, although rather drastic and extreme by most peoples standards, are a few very viable solutions to a very specific problem.

Do bear in mind that I am addressing the human portion of the equation, and only a very small portion of it. Nevertheless, these are important points to ponder…. As far as corrective mechanisms for our current monetary woes, there was a rather nice submission by John-C towards the top that can give you a good idea of what can be done there. That might not seem like a real solution, but I think that because our problems are not simple or singular, it would be a start.

The idea of this segment was to start a conversation about possibilities, but I noticed that all the contributors were early thirties and older. What about the young people? We, the twenty-somethings, are effected by the decisions made by our government and other controlling entities, but we are underrepresented.

Sure, we have the right to vote, but outside of that does anybody really care what we have to say? I started working at sixteen, started paying taxes at sixteen, but does anyone really want to know what I think our tax money should be spent on? Not as far as I can tell. What do we know anyway? On top of that, even when we do offer suggestions, they are not properly considered. We may not have the answers, but as far as I can tell nobody else does either.

But I do know that no matter what the American people decide to do, it will take time. In fact, much more time than people like or want to admit. We, the people, cannot come up with real, viable solutions for the future without considering what the youth of today wants and needs for their future.

And we cannot possibly know what that is unless somebody asks, and does so with the intent to actually listen to and consider the answers. Every Empire, Colonial Power, has failed for the same reasons. Have your faith and laws by all means but respect thier faith and Sharia laws. Education has always been the key, but our education system is failing our children. It is the strange thinking that every child will benefit from this one-size fits all education. It is this thinking that every child will and should go on to college.

It is this thinking that anything less than being a lawyer, doctor, politician, engineer, or teacher is somehow less than significant. Educators make kids feel that unless they have aspirations of going on to college, they will be nothing. The manufacturing sector is gone, there are only so many service jobs and only so many jobs requiring a higher education.

What is to become of all these people with degrees that mean nothing? It is all absurd, really. And the biggest thing is that not everyone wants to go on to college. There are plenty of people who will probably not cut it in college. We all contribute to the function of this country. Fix this and I think we could actually begin to see a light at the end of the tunnel.

Must Americans are unrepentantly uneducated, ill informed and unmotivated. Joseph de Maistre wrote in And most of everything else that de Maistre has to say seems like utter rubbish to me. But, I believe this basic statement is true: We have the government which we collectively deserve.

If we want to change things, we as a people have to start participating positively in our improvement instead of just standing around throwing tomatoes at whomever is currently in power. Allow Gay marriages, it is a religious right as much as a constitutional right. Offer jobs to the unemployed to repair and rebuild our collapsing infrastructure.

Maybe bring back the CCC Civilian Conservation Corps , they did a wonderful job building our infrastructure, why not let them repair it. It was bigotry and racial injustice that made it illegal, and now organized crime is running rampant like with prohibition. If it is regulated and taxed the prospective revenue is in the billions for each state. Update the Building codes. Make it mandatory to install solar shingles, attach small wind generators to houses.

There has got to be a way to make a window generate power with all the light that goes through it. However, the preachers of morality are not always following the same rules and those rules are not always applied evenly. Wallstreet helped to create a paperwork mess, that was profitable for a while, requested and received a government bailout and then denies extending bailouts to their customers while handing out raises. A woman extolling abstinence and success as a single mother at 15k a speaking engagement, while American single teen-age mothers are seeking welfare.

Ministers, actual preachers, are advising their congregation on faithful marriages and then cheating on their own spouses. And if someone mentions regulations, the answer is that any regulation would hurt the small business and the government should have no part.

I think that with both parents working in many families, it would be a good idea to extend the school day and year, BUT only if a LONG siesta was provided after lunch. The people in this country seem to be in such a rush to go nowhere. If only our citizens were responsible enough to check the facts on PolitiFact. It should address common daily problems like how to handle a diminishing workload, why stealing is wrong even if it goes unnoticed, and how we can support each other to improve our lot.

We need to learn how and why to help each other. We need representation, not just leadership. Our lot should not be a compromise made between the middle class and the wealthy. Prioritize diagnosis and treatment of underlying causes over treatment of symptoms.

Detect and treat diseases early; prevent them whenever possible. Prioritize mental and physical health first, Viagra and boob jobs later. Like water and air, declare health care a human right that should be available to all. There are many problems in this country and it seems as if now we are in a critical decade where the choices made now will effect the nation, this world and humankind. Churches are a cancer and a huge source of tax revenue. Next, get serious about electric cars and real alternative energy; natural gas is not clean, we are being lied to.

We need to break down the military industrial complex- stop waging corporate wars, and end the drug war. There is no hope for any of these happening, really, and I admit that. We are run by a two party corporate oligopoly and money talks and ruins us all. I completely agree with Hodge and Lane about the most important 2 issues: FAIR and a new employment entitlement. Incidentally the UN declaration on Human Rights includes provisions on fair elections, management of poverty with government, and a right to employment.

The conservative oligarchy controlling the US now just prefers to prescribe Victorian morals and a 17th century labor model instead of trusting the advice of their own ivy league professional classes. The FBI and DOJ needs to amend their missions to prosecute corruption and crony capitalism instead of scapegoating poor kids over failed drug, terrorism, and immigration laws. We need hard whistleblower protections.

Thank you for allowing us to have a voice. I am so proud of you this morning for giving us a chance. I knew there were more folks out here ready to move for the right reasons and I believe that this forum will be bigger than you could have imagined it to be. We all have answers to problems and many of us have fixed our American Dream within our personal circles. Maybe we will have the chance to share without the media drama so we can really impact the world.

We need to re-build our infrastructure, absolutely right. It would give us jobs. Also I think one of the best things we could do is to find a way to stop the people in Washington who can vote and approve their own annual raise from doing so!! Can we put that on hiatus like everything else for the next yrs? Exponentially, how much would we save and free up of our tax dollars? This country has adopted the band-aid approach to fixing our problems.

We need to start with getting rid of the IRS and enacting a flat sales tax. Legalize drugs, the crimes committed by drug dealers and users will go away. Public school is a disgrace. The first thing we must do before we can achieve all the good things mentioned in the video and in these comments is to force politicians to represent the will of their constituents.

We need a system for collecting and publishing constituent preferences on an issue-by-issue basis. We have the technology.

Until we take this first step, politicians will continue to say anything needed to get elected, then turn around and vote for what their parties, donors, and lobbyists want. Until we have that crucial piece of information, money and power — the two most corrupting forces known to man — will be the deciding factor for who runs and who gets elected. Until we have that information, Representative Democracy will remain a sham.

Some country will figure out how to achieve this in the near future. Once it happens somewhere, it will sweep the democratic world. I feel that a few of the wealthiest Americans should cease and desist in making their tax deductible contributions to various entities and GIVE a portion of their gazillions to bail out this wonderful country.

Wow well its a big question to answer quickly. But in my opinion most of those so call experts failed to answer the question. With the exception of the woman who talked about technology helping us was heading in the right direction. I as a regular member of the workforce in this state think that one of our countries biggest problems is illegal immigrants. S has a employment problem less illegal immigrants in the U.

S means more jobs for citizens. Now I am not against anyone who comes to the country the legal way. Taxpayers own the airwaves, and this contribution to the working of our democracy is the cost for the media business to make their profits, by sacrificing this airtime.

The need for political fundraising and contributions would be greatly reduced, as the most money raised and spent is overwhelmingly for tv ads. Re-vitalizing the economy and job growth starts at the bottom, then works its way up the food chain from an employee perspective. America has a global competitive labor cost disadvantage according to experts. America also has a disproportionate prison population in need of skills and jobs. My proposal would be to train and hire Americas cheapest captive labor force which is non-violent fellons in prison.

America would not only leed the global economy in inexpensive alternative power, we would also be replacing unskilled no chance fellons and adding new ready to work employees to the labor market. America would also benefit from having increased energy independence products, research and development test beds for new technology and innovation. Prisons could become energy independent profit centers instead of operational cost money loosing requirements.

Instead of warehousing citizens we would spur job growth and wealth among the poor and middle-class. Because all those product made in prisons would be sold, installed and utilized around the globe. If I could focus on one area, it would be character education for our children and parenting classes for older children and adults.

Instilling values such as respect, responitizenship would go a long way in enablings, and citizenship would go a long way in enabling the upcoming generations to create a better world and fix the problems that will still be around. Teaching and enabling parents to demonstrate, teach, reinforce and foster these same values ultimately could make significant positive changes in our world. There are no current problems in our world that would not benefit if we as individuals and as a whole used the above values to guide every aspect of our lives and decisions.

I should much like to see what would happen if America were to restructure its government. I think that America might hmake better policies if our elections were taken in a more representative fashion. I would like to see town councils and county commissions electing State Representatives, and to see the State Legislatures electing Federal Representatives.

The hierarchy should be better able to respond to the will of the people than it would if flooded with proposals. Jobs will return when the cost of production in the US plus shipping and handling becomes equal to that cost in the foreign countries where the jobs went.

Reducing taxes might enable us to buy more stuff, — most of which will still be made in: I believe another key to fixing America is preparing the future generations for real world life in the global economy. America is no longer a farming nation, so first off get rid of the farm calendar school year and make school year round with a 1 month break every 4 months to refresh young minds.

Next our children will not make money as adults learning American history, we need the cirriculum to reflect real world skills, including for example:. I also believe in pracxtical lab experience goes hand in hand with book learning. Therefore our children should do practical things like manage the classroom budget, mentor younger children, manage their learning experience, manage their finances, inter-act with companies who product they buy and use, etc, etc.

A little known fact: High School children in Europe are learning at our freshman and sophmore America college level students today. High schoolers should be in uniforms and stay at school to do their home work until their parents are home to feed them dinner in my opinion.

This policy would incite a vicious trade war that would shut down international trade and dramatically reduce both GDP and the per capita income in the continental USA. Yes it would provide a few extra jobs to some of the older, smaller, rust-belt towns, but may lead to even higher unemployment nationwide!

It may even lead to greater income disparity amongst the economic and social classes because national prices for consumer goods would inflate , and may cause the smart minds that helped us develop new, path-breaking industries and technologies in the past to just stay home……for good!

Expand the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to separate commerce, just like religion, from the State … and take our country back from the brink of plutocratic oligarchy. I disagree with Reihan Salam. Though some poor families make wise decisions with money, not all will. So in my opinion giving cash vouchers to poor families would be much worse, will they go to mcdonalds and buy their foods, then spend the rest on clothes?

It is a good idea, but there would have to be some sort of structure to it. Just put a low cap on what they can spend on campaigns, require full disclosure and prohibit lobbyists from contributing money and writing our laws as they have done most of the last 20 years.

And oh yeah, pass the Fair Tax, too which would get our economy moving again! Big money corrupts the election process. Erica, your involvement is the MOST important.

The problems are more complex and no one person has the answers. It will be up to you and your generation to seek the truth and reality. There would be no foreclosures.

Please speak the truth and we will listen. The reality of American life is that you have to have be at certain income level in order to have a healthy family enviorment; this amount varies on whether you live in NYC, Indianapolis, or Lafayette. This economic reality was understood and applied to the tax code between up until when personal greed displaced the greater good of the country. Stable familiies make a more stable America. Large segments of society, with both parents working, should not have to struggle from paycheck to paycheck.

There is something basically wrong with the system, if this occurring. Lets stop being the world police and start focusing on the problems we faced at home. Why does USA always have to take the lead in problems going on elsewhere around world?

Lets step back and let the United Nation and other first world countries be the leader. Spend the resources and effort to fix the poverty and infrastructure in this country. I am afraid that this country is going downhill and the rest of the world is improving with leaps and bound. Wow, we are blown away by the outpouring of thoughtful, heartfelt and creative responses here and on other pages on this site. We will be spending some time figuring out how we can incorporate your voices directly into our future efforts with this project.

And yes, we will get some regular working folks, maybe some of you commenters, into the next round of thinkers. How we can fix the economy? Stop being slaves of the OPEC.

I think dogs are very under-utilized in our society. If we rescued dogs from animal shelters and trained them to detect chemicals used in bomb making, etc, we could use them at airport security checkpoints.

We could also expand their use in early detection of cancer; alerting for seizures or diabetic highs and lows; and as service dogs for people with special needs. The economic, social and health benefits are there for the taking. With proper training and testing, dogs could be a great resource. It seems a huge waste to euthanize so many of them when they have such potential.

With this in mind watch how fast many move back to do business in the US and suddenly there is a need for adding wait for it, wait for it, wait for it , YES — American workers! This shuts down the IRS. Congress must not pass any laws that are greater then 2 pages long and must be written in plain english, to be understood by anyone without a law degree.

Simple laws automatically remove the loopholes. For every 1 law passed, 15 laws must be removed from the books by those who wrote the new law. All laws must have a year expiration date.

A law will automatically expire and must be rewritten from scratch and passed all over again if it is to be active once again. This cleans up the current legal mess. Jobs will be created to transition society from the industrial age to the next age of Greening.

This will provide new jobs, will improve the climate, rid pollution, save the planet, etc.. Using the natural elements of wind and solar power. If that happened, we would have more people going to jail. I believe the most serious issue is to control health care costs. Directly or indirectly those costs affect nearly everyone in the US and drive many economic decisions. I would like to see an effort to take the profit out of health care and move it to a solutions based environment. The government could work with other nations to develop a drug industry that was funded by them and focused on making effective drugs with carefully defined performance measures and paid as a proportion of the patients who improved or extended life as a result of those drugs.

No advertizing of any kind, rely on recognized health care journals for information distribution. Also, remove the use of malpractice law — if a patient is unhappy or believes there was harm, use a adjucitation panel of doctors and citizens to resolve the issue with real punishment for doctors who are not careful or give misleading diagnosis.

For the hospitals, the issue is how to fund them to stay in business without duplication of services in dense metropolitan areas. Have each hospital provide adequate emergency service, then if necessary, a patient could be transported to a nearby hospital that specialized in that particular condition.

Each hospital could focus on a particular specialty or issue and for those rural hospitals where another facility was not within reasonable transportation 25 miles? Likewise, doctors could be employed by hospitals which needed their service or specialty — continue to use federal money to support doctors in rural areas, perhaps by paying down university loans or provide additional educational opportunities.

I really support universal care with everyone required to contribute — perhaps a sliding scale based on income reported on the I do believe small copays are necessary to discourage abuse, but encourage people to use doctors for preventative care rather than the hospital emergency room.

For the truly poor, a voucher or ID card to get services might be a solution. People do have to participate by good living standards and risk management. Reducing medical costs would help business and people across the board.

It would also give business a much better expectation of future costs and not affect a hiring decision for people with disabilities.

It would relieve many people of unknown future medical costs and allow retirement savings to be much better utilized. Start by having all our school children taking a day in the fall and a day in the spring to go out into our community and clean up the litter. Perhaps children will learn at a young age that there are no servants, no entitlements, and that we are all responsible for the well being of our country. Start by keeping a clean house. Second and I am not anti-war nor am I anti-military we need to bring our military home and all the equipment.

We need to engage many people in fixing all the roads, bridges and environment. Perhaps the military could work 2 weeks on military necessities then 2 weeks on learning the skills to keep America going by learning to fix the physical things and doing the fixes. These two steps I would hope would put people to work and hopefully cause more to have pride in all things American. It might help to Look at How Ben Franklin ran his Junto and was able to develop ideas into plans of action. He had two requirements 1 Anonymous and 2 No negative comments allowed.

He believed ideas were like small plants and must be nurtured and developed or they would be destroyed before they had a chance to grow. Tell congress to stop blocking clean energy alternatives.

Treat all animals we eat humanly including proper organic natural diets and inviroments. Moniter sweat shops that make our clothes. Since we are the melting pot, put our heads together to make an all around better world. Ensuring that all illegals of any country who want to go to school or work in the U. Do not let the illegals put there children in the U. Do not give out any kind of welfare unless the entire family in the U. If you are working in the U. You must pay taxes to our government at any rate of pay.

School children of any age should be legal and should receive breakfast and lunch free. An incentive program should be set up for parents who have school age children so that you receive money if your child is in school for the entire school day. If the child is not in school, the family gets a deduction in the incentive pay for the next month. That includes books, etc. Every child who does not want to go to college must take a year in the Peace Corp.

All illegals in our prison system are to return to their native countries to finish their incarceration at the expense of that country. Keep the borders closed until everyone in the other countries are on board with economic development, instead of drugs and alcohol freeways.

Take a step back in the military. Put our diplomatic foot out first. Promote education and peace. Get rid of private campaign financing. Get rid of career politicians. It may all come down to our vote in the next ellection. The next President is critical if we want to avoid the mistake of escalating this situation and letting it get out of hand.

The lesson of Viet Nam is not what some have determined -- that we went in with out an intention to win. This is an erroneous conclusion. Iraq is a war we cannot win. The numbers show the failure of such a strategy. We must elect someone who will change the strategy and work for a solution to the mess we have gotten ourselves into. Winning is no longer the issue. Damage control is the issue. I was in high school between and , I have lived through the disruption and societal upheaval already, take my word, we do not want to repeat this.

MLM September 22, 9: I am a New Yorker as well and I second your notion. There are many unanswered questions and debate is silenced and dying. The neo-con republicans are unmistakably sophisticated in their ability to manipulate debate through talking points and character assassination. No other political organization comes close to approaching their cohesiveness, dogmatism and funding.

They are shaping the world to benefit an elite cadre of ultra-wealthy and have displayed moral ambiguity and killer instinct that liberals lack. Because regardless of neocon talking points, easy-on-the-brain mantras, and general misdirection, our Constitution and the foundations of Democracy are being and have been corroded.

Whether Republican or Democract or Non-affiliated independent, the fact of the matter is the majority does not benefit from the neocon rise to power. Exploitation of the American people and regardless of our differences, the net effect has been suffering inflicted by Americans on Americans. Who will shoulder the burden of a trillion dollar war? Why is a public fresh with the memory of Enron so complacent when this looming spectre of economic mismanagement and book cooking threatens the masses?

Perhaps the wrong talking point is being used? Perhaps the public should be told they are being "taxed". This war inflicts a tax that will be paid by each and every citizen and their children for generations to come. It will be paid by regular folks that are struggling to maintain quality of life taken for granted by our parents. When the government buys billion dollars of fighter planes, that money is coming from us.

That's billion less for schools, for hospitals, for roads, for police, for every thread in the fabric of our community. And none of that money was spent to make us safer. Millions of innocent lives have been destroyed by US military action in Iraq. Are we so egocentric as a society to ignore the injustice in attacking and invading a sovereign nation? Or lacking in empathy to see the Iraqi anger that is fermenting from this invasion? The reality is that the US has caused destruction that destabilizes an entire region, affecting hundreds of millions of lives.

The reality is that the neocons continue a drumbeat of war to renew their coffers. The reality is that the current administration uses terror as tool, no less so than the terrorists they purport to battle. There is an elemental wisdom that transcends time and place. That wisdom offered by Socrates, Buddha, Confucious and others is that we should ask questions, of ourselves and of society.

For knowledge, for enlightenment, for responsibility, we must question. In light of this simple wisdom, we must ask questions of our leaders.

Why was French intelligence ignored? Why did the towers collapse like a controlled demolition. Why were there no explosives forensics allowed on the rubble. Why was there a powerdown of security systems prior to the attack. Why were bomb sniffing dogs removed. There are so many questions unanswered, so much debate silenced under the the suffocating muffle of flag and cross.

We repeat history's mistakes. A nation stands by as innocents die. Was Nazi Germany so different? Is our jingoism and religious fervor no less manipulated? When we stop questioning, when we allow debate to be controlled by an elite cadre of avarice, we allow atrocities to be committed. Nor has it been held accountable for the crimes it has committed in Iraq. Why is the question we should all be asking. I'm dismayed, however, that you have not incorporated any of the dozens and dozens of questions being posed by the Truth.

Polls are registering huge percentages of people who believe that key members of the American government were complicit in the attack http: Many of the brightest technical minds are on board with this. Many key people in positions of authority are also. These latter two issues are frequent topics on your program. It is a brave step, but it is one that could lead to the real truth, the truth that we must have.

Please do not dismiss the questions, nor the inconvenient answers until you have read the arguments. Droves and droves of people are seeing the light as I see it. Please come along with us on this quest. Jade September 21, Jesse, you refuse to believe the obvious when it comes to Bush but quickly believe anything negative about Clinton. As an independent I hold all accountable. September 21, Jesse Norman September 21, 8: I am a regular viewer of Bill Moyers Journal and applaud you for giving voice to so many courageous people.

Your reality I think is peyote-laced, with all due respect. I think your continual posting of "The real reason we're in Iraq" is something you have saved on your computer and you post that same thing on every blog you find. No way someone repeats themselves like that in verbatim unless they have it saved. If that's true, then that's really disturbing. You can have your own take on reality. I want no part of it.

Jesse Norman September 20, 1: Go ahead and live with your attitude against Clinton if it makes you happy. If you have time open your mind up to reality. Jay P September 18, I hate people that's the one true emotion that calls me out to challenge them to a difficult round of it I was born to stick the needle in the balloon heads of the world You guys really are funny with your views. What if I don't get rid of the chip on my shoulder over Clinton? Jay P, if you were speaking on this thread you'd sound like a tape recorder.

This is the third time you've said that same exact thing, one on another thread. Guess what I asked three times to you Jesse Norman September 18, Jesse Norman You seem to make many assumptions when it relates to Clinton but are very defensive with Bush.

Get rid of the big chip on your shoulder. An influential group of conservatives convinced President George W. Bush that it was in America's best interests to conquer Iraq as a first step toward dominating the oil-producing nations in the Middle East. There was no "exit plan" because we never intended to exit.

The plan was, and is, to build military bases in Iraq and stay there forever. Our leaders see Iraq as a place to make money. Jay P September 17, 5: If you have not let your congress critters know your views on impeaching the current occupant and his puppet master I strongly encourage you to do so. If you do not know how to contact these people here is a URL that will help resolve that small item http: Let your elected officials know what you are thinking and what you'd like them to do, while there is still time and before all your rights are taken away by the imperial shrub.

Steve S September 17, 4: While the Congress hesitates to impeach the President and Vice President, what are the alternatives for citizens who think that the President and Vice President have committed crimes against the nation? For instance, is making a collective citizen's arrest a possibility?

Indeed, the laws of citizens arrest appear to be predicated upon the effectiveness of the Second Amendment. Simply put, without firepower, people are less likely going to be able to make a citizen's arrest. A random sampling of the various states as well as the District of Columbia indicates that a citizen's arrest is valid when a public offense was committed in the presence of the arresting private citizen or when the arresting private citizen has a reasonable belief that the suspect has committed a felony, whether or not in the presence of the arresting citizen.

If committing a felony is the benchmark for determining whether a crime has been committed, are violations of their oath of office felonies. For instance, if they violated their oath to support and defend the constitution of the United States, is that violation a felony?

Roger Chapanis September 16, Although I don't feel he did enough if anything at all to prevent it, Al Qaeda was hitting us all over the world when Clinton was in office and Clinton did absolutely nothing about any attack. Failed to kill Osama: Here's something you won't like reading though. Sudan offered Clinton three times for them to capture Bin Laden, ship him to Saudi Arabia where we could then take him. Clinton said "we can't get him on anything under international law" so he refused.

He denies this, but he was caught on audio tape not only getting these offers but declining. Manipulating emotion for Iraq war: I totally disagree, but that's just my opinion as it is yours. Blaming Katrina on Bush is just foolish.

While he may have not acted quick enough, the citizens who were trapped in New Orleans were supposed to have been evacuated. Mayor Nagin released a free dvd a year before Katrina saying if there was a Cat. Those who had no way of leaving would have school buses escort them out of the city. This didn't happen in Katrina. New Orleans didn't evacuate and the buses were left under the water just like everything else. Is Bush supposed to tell the mayor and governor to evacuate their own citizens?

No, that's their job. Blaming Bush for this is ludicrous. Bush is President and can nominate who he wants. Corruption in congress is Bush's fault? Republicans had Abramov and the democrats have Hsu. Hsu was a fugitive from the law for larceny when he did his fundraising.

The addresses of those who donated, collected by Hsu gave as much as many of their homes were worth. I'll skip down to global warming: Did you know Mars is warming even at a faster rate than Earth?

NASA came to that conclusion because of Mars' polar caps. When I was a kid I remember the consensus among scientists was that we were in an ice age. Made the cover of Time magazine even. Since they have talked about global warming for the last twenty years or better, that means within a decade scientists went from ice age to global warming. How does that happen? Can man create such a warming? Only the Sun can. That explains the warming of Mars too, unless you believe Bush is warming Mars by lasers.

Most of these are too easy, but you get my point. I can play these games all you want. Gotta do better than this. Dividing our nation happened when the left cried about how Al lost the election with all of those silly allegations about how Bush stole it.

Even Bill Maher admitted nothing illegal or wrong happened and he hates Bush. Those votes in Florida with the hanging chads were counted by the press. According to the media who was in on the counting, Bush gained votes, not lost them. They probably wanted Gore to win in their count because that would have been a huge story.

Bush gaining votes obviously wasn't. Who's not going to know? She even said she doesn't know whether or not she was undercover at that time. Did you watch her testimony on Capitol Hill? Sorry, had to get to a few more. Carol, the info I got I found online which was done by the media research center. Glad you don't like the extremist views because a lot do. Jesse Norman September 15, 2: Deep Throat September 15, We do agree on some things.

You have a point. Personally, I take extremist comments with a grain of salt. I don't believe we had much choice but, to trust the President's decision to go to war based on what he and the media presented.

If it's technically a war, a not is debatable. I don't know where you are getting your information but, I understood Moyer's to say that the D. At any rate, I don't believe anything should be based on surface value and find a complex world deserves better.

The transparency we often hear about and that is so desperately needed becomes the center when we turn away from lies and deception in times of desperation or otherwise. It starts with each of us me. September 14, 7: Finally we seem to agree on something Carol.

There is another thread on here from a show done by Moyers about how the press was complicit in convincing the country in going to war in Iraq. Of course many people actually bought this. No one in the press was "afraid" to criticize Bush because they have done it from day one. Is that a bad thing? No, of course not. But Moyers trying to convince people the press was Bush's right hand man is ludicrous.

There's further evidence of the liberal bias in the media when Moveon. The Times gave some bs excuse as to why they did, but anyone with any keen sense could see through that. Carol, your point to me beforehand was that the press wasn't honest. Which side were they going towards dishonesty? It would be the left wouldn't it? Obviously the NY Times weren't thinking of profits when it gave Moveon.

Obviously the print media isn't thinking about profits since their bias has turned many away from buying newspapers. Actually they can't resist themselves. Newspaper subscriptions are dwindling by the day. I don't think they really care about profits because their profits are down. I'm a realist and I don't try to see things just to validate my own opinion. I don't twist and turn things to suit my suspicions. I don't cheat myself with that kind of logical thinking.

MLM you said you were a republican for many years but hated the rhetoric of the right. Have you heard of the rhetoric on the left, which is by far worse than the right? What happened this week when democratic politicians accused the General of the same thing as the Moveon ad did was despicable. You had a compulsive liar in Hillary Clinton call an honored General a liar.

Dems all over the place called him a liar after many sang his praises as they casted their vote. None of them dared to question Petraeus as to why he would lie and then soon send off his own son to Iraq. When Bill Clinton was called a murderer by the far right over the death of Vince Foster, the republicans denounced it. How many times have you heard Bush called "a nazi" or "Hitler", yet the democrats are loudly silent. Listen to the rhetoric on the left and see how it's NOT denounced. Wait til '08 and see the rhetoric on the left with a more powerful Moveon machine.

You might have heard in the '00 election about how if you vote for Bush another black church will burn. That will be nothing. When the american people see the rhetoric on the far left and see how it's not denounced by dems and vote for the republican, I really see Moveon. They do say they have bought and paid for the democratic party. I have to agree with them. Jesse Norman September 14, 1: Blogs can be addicting but, please, pace yourself.

I believe your input is quite valuable and wouldn't want to lose touch. I believe that there are more that strive for the center are in more numbers than we've heard from or about. It gives me a sense of hope. Carol Huss September 13, 9: Today the press and the media have been consolidated into huge Corporations. The driving force is profit, shareholders, and stock prices. If anything they have all shifted to the right, because the right is completely pro business and deregulation.

One thing for sure, the idea that the media plays a valuable roll in keeping democracy in check is lost. The reason this blog appears so one-sided is that it seems to be the only place where this point of view can see the light of day.

I am not excited about either party either. But not participating is NO option. My family heritage goes back, on at least three branches, to the 16 and 17 hundreds on these shores. Radical passionate individualism just runs in the family. My political strategy at this point is to use my vote to try and bring the pendulum back closer to the center.

MLM September 13, 9: Thanks for your comments, MLM. I'm glad you just took a break and weren't away for long. Sadly, I'm not very impressed with any of the politicians. Right now I don't see myself at any party affiliation. Facilitating the truth in for democracy and freedom takes a joint effort in diplomacy and understanding without deception. It is a process that requires civil contemplation and debate. The occurances and exposure of that is, sadly, not a standard that is used enough today.

We all have choices as well as responsibilities that must be addressed. Jesse, I don't know anyone is naive here except maybe the politicans, if they think the lies and deception will work for them, at least, in the long run. Carol Huss September 13, 7: You know I grew up believeing this BS about the press. This is the debate that is truly irrelevant and trivial -- this seeking to demonize the opposition.

It is a totally non-productive debate that diverts the masses from debating the real issues that affect our lives. In order for America to work, it takes both the Left and the Right. And, I say that not out of what I hear from the press but by the language of the automated phone calls and letters soliciting donations from the Republican Party.

I was a card-carrying member until recently Also I receive this same rhetoric from my Republican representatives when they respond to my letters. Having been a conservative for 52 years, it is the Right Wing Rhetoric that has changed my viewpoint. Everything about the current regime is about shutting down debate by demonizing anyone that disagrees.

I have lived through total Democratic control and now total Republican control. I speak from my own experience, I personally have NEVER experienced fear that my fundamental constitutional freedoms were in jeopardy until today -- freedom of speech, separation of church and state which is the fundamental key to freedom of religion , freedom to be secure in my affairs under the 4th amendment.

I see all of these eroding into an Elitist Theocracy reminiscent of 18th Century England -- conservative vs. MLM September 13, 4: Well I'm not naive. I realize we don't live in Utopia where everything is at it seems or right. My friends think I'm actually quite savvy. Even the liberal ones. A lot don't like what I have to say, but they definitely respect what I say since they do know I know what I am talking about.

Hey, it's a gift. I know most on here won't agree with this, but the press mostly is left leaning. This story and others on PBS are just a small example.

I don't either because it never happened. MSNBC collected data on journalists who made donations from the through the start of the campaigns, gave to democrats or liberal causes while only 16 gave to republicans. When asked "generally speaking do you consider yourself a democrat, republican, independent, or something else? Foxnews does lean to the right.

The only reason why they look so far right though is because everyone else leans left. No one would care if Foxnews leaned to the right except they are doing very well in the ratings. See how I'm willing to admit Foxnews leans to the right? Will anyone else here admit most of the media leans to the left?

Who's the naive one? Jesse Norman September 13, 6: What I would like to know is A new administration would at least give us hope for peace, if, and maybe if, we can show them by example. Carol Huss September 12, Jesse Norman September 11, Looks like they posted my comment afterall, only a day after I sent it.

I'm sure some postings don't get through for whatever reasons but if you look at the other threads and it's at least against Bush or the war. I've also seen the wackiest contributions on here as well. A lot of anti-Israeli sentiment, too. Yeah, blame the only civilized country in the region for protecting it's sliver of land against the continent scale lands of arabia.

Didn't know you were dyxlexic. In my first post I did ask if you meant WWII and really didn't know what you meant about "freighting". I assumed "frightening" but didn't know.

I am sure your posts not getting uploaded is due to user error, the same has happened to my post and I never took it personally, as I have reposted from a word document and they uploaded just fine.

Thank you for pointing out my typos, and obvious problem with dyslexia. I really appreciate that, so kind of you. I listened to him with my own two ears. He clearly connected the two and NO one would have made that connection with out the Bush propaganda. But I am sure you hung on his every word and were able to catch his every speech. Show me the evidence that Saddam and Al Qaeda were connected, because the opinions and reports I have listened to say differently.

The nonpartisan analysis that seems most reasonable points out that Saddam saw Bin Lauden as a threat to his power, he was much too paranoid of a dictator to allow Al Qaeda to operate out of Iraq. In my opinion this rings true. Saddam was focused on two things, the local power play to control the Persian Gulf between Iran, Saudi Arabia and himself and his insane tribal hatred for his own citizens.

These two things are what prompted him to invade Kuwait, which prompted the first Gulf War. He wanted Kuwait because the other two major players control so much more coastline and this inhibits his ability to compete in shipping his oil. Saddam was an insane, ruthless and evil character with no redeeming qualities. I am sure he is burning in hell. But, it is quite likely he never really had plans to attack the US, his neighbors for sure, but the US … his world was much, much too small.

Oh and by the way, I never supported, liked or voted for Bill Clinton. In my opinion he is just another sleazy Politician who cannot control his behavior. I have always agreed that he inherited the good economy rather than create it. Passing the looming crises on to Bush. This is why I defended Bush in the beginning. But, I also do not think that anyone, including the terrorist could have anticipated what actually happened — the two buildings collapsing. So blaming in hindsight is really not a productive thing to do.

I still believe that if we give up our most basic freedoms we have let the terrorist win. And I still believe this is what is happening. This administration response is DEAD wrong as far as I am concerned and rather that winning the war on terror we are just fanning the flames, giving justification to their hatred and feeding our own irrational fear.

I am really honest when I say I would rather die in another terrorist attack than to give up my basic liberty under the Constitution and live in a country that is not free. MLM September 9, 9: I guess I'll have to repeat what I tried to send earlier but wasn't posted. I think it was my nicest post too. Weird that I have read some postings calling Bush a murderer made it with no problem. No bias at all though. It never happened, so what the poll shows is people will believe anything and certainly will believe what they want to believe.

I can read postings here and say it's definitely not a one-sided flaw. What the Bush administration however said was there was a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda, which there was. It is evident from the documents we've recovered as well as the knowledge that Al Zarqawi was treated in Baghdad before the war. As far as comparing war speeches go, you can do that with anyone.

You have to be smarter than that. What are speeches that rally people to war supposed to sound like? It doesn't even have to be about war. I bet if I had to I can find similar statements from Reagan and Ghandi. Were Ghandi and Reagan alike? What does 'freighting' mean?

You lost me there. Hitler wasn't around in WWI either. I do strongly agree that the administration was very adamant about admitting mistakes, which made things worse.

Rumsfeld was horrible and I celebrated the day he finally resigned. If I had more money I might have even invited all of you. Okay, I wouldn't have. I've never done drugs and I don't want to get a contact high. I guess also Jay P. Jesse Norman September 9, 2: In an effort to rally support for a war, any speech will have similarities. That's just common sense.

If I had to I could point out things how Reagansaid things that sounded like Ghandi. See, one can do that without comparing speeches on war, so that means nothing. Were Reagan and Ghandi two peas in a pod? Did you mean WWII? Because Hitler wasn't anything in WWI. As far as the poll goes people will believe what they want to believe. What you accuse the administration of doing is simply not true.

They did say there was a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda which was true. The more time went by the more documents were found linking them together. Al Zarqawi was in Iraq before the war and received treatment on a wounded leg in Baghdad.

There are other things linking Saddam with Al Qaeda which you can find on the net. If anything the administration didn't differentiate one terrorist or terrorist organization from the other, which it shouldn't do.

There are many with the same objective and there's no amount of appeasement that will make them change their minds. While I agree we should have concentrated more on getting Bin Laden, the status quo of the Iraqi situation was unacceptable.

The UN loved Saddam despite his crimes because they got money and cheap oil. Who are the real criminals? Who really should be impeached?

Why does the UN even exist when it runs away from its own charter time and time again? My question for all of you is do you believe we should go into Darfur even if and when the UN says 'no, we won't do anything'? Jesse Norman September 8, 2: Several people have objected to the comparison of this Administration and Hitler. I agree that this is a strong statement and of course has a strong element of hyperbole.

I in no way wish to say that the leadership in Washington even comes close to that level of insanity and evil. Still there are, I believe some freighting similarities, in the tactics and inflammatory rhetoric that have and continue to come from this Administration. The use of fear for persuasion, the demonizing of opponents, the unwillingness to admit mistakes, the refusal to change the tone of this rhetoric even after it was made clear that the basis for entry was false…is what concerns me most.

Neither of which has been proven true. This belief was fostered by this Administration. This is clearly, in my opinion, cause for alarm. I cannot say why this Administration was so intent on attacking a country that, no matter how evil and corrupt it was, did nothing to provoke our attack. And posed no immediate danger to the US. I am reading a book about WWI at the moment. In it are several quotes form Hitler, to me there are obvious similarities to the tactics used by this Administration to sell this War.

The vector will not be asked afterwards whether he told the truth or not. When starting and waging war, it is not right that matters by victory. MLM September 8, Jesse Norman September 7, Sorry, to intrude Jay P but, you might be over simplifying the situation. I'm glad the military study came out in the news today that we need to take "lighter steps" in Iraq and move closer to ending the war without occupation and it's a relief to hear from hearts that may be in the right place.

How the President responds seems to be the difference between him being able to then keep his job to the end of this term or not. It'll be interesting how it plays out. It also seems that the executive branch is watering down the responsibilities of the legislative and judicial branches as well Carol Huss September 6, 6: Jesse Norman Thanks for your comments.

Let me ask you this, if this war was started so Bush and Co. Jay P September 6, 4: Jay P, where is your evidence of this? You know what evidence is, right? I can make up stuff all I want too but just because I can come up with it in my mind, it doesn't make it fact. Please tell us if you were a fly on the wall when all of this was supposedly discussed. I'd be interested in reading it.

I'm tired of all this "American imperialism" talk. Name a country we have really taken over and kept. I don't recall ever hearing the saying "the sun never sets on america". If we went into Iraq because of oil, then how come oil is so high-priced throughout the world, not just in our country. Why do I have a big chip on my shoulder because of Clinton? Because he was very corrupt and I'm sure hardly any of you actually accept that he was. The only thing he really got credit for was a good economy and that was falsely accredited.

He was just president at the right time with the internet boom. Just as he was leaving we had the internet bust. Al Gore should have gotten the credit for the economy since he invented the internet. Carol, you make a very good point. One side pits against the other almost like in a play. There's the good side and the bad side. Each side sees the other as the bad side, although I never heard Clinton compared to Hitler on the right like Bush has been nearly on a daily basis.

It's almost like it's a setup. While most of America is in the middle, both parties play to their bases and nothing gets done. They worry more about playing "gotcha" than solving our nation's problems. My points have been consistent that selective anger does nothing because both sides have it.

When a president is elected, he will have selective outrage pitted against him. That's the state of our country right now. If we left Iraq right now, what happened in Vietnam after we left would pale in comparison. You can argue whether or not we should have gone in and if we screwed up or not. Saying Bush lied though is delusional considering every democrat who said Saddam had WMD's along with every country in the world, Clinton, and Hans Blix must have been in on the lie.

We all know that's not true I hope. Jesse Norman September 6, 1: It's obviously too easy to point fingers and take sides. Does truth in democracy and freedom require that we choose either Democrats or Republicans? I'm glad the discussion goes on. As far as what the majority thinks or does about impeachment now or what was previously done remains to be seen.

Fighting a war is part of a process. There are battles won and lost, a journey. Is it our place to make Iraq a US occupation? The need for it remains to be seen. It's only then that will we find our destiny whether to end the war or not.

We have not found the necessary leadership with the UN? Discussion and Debate has it's purpose yet, let's not expect the required action to be proficiently done with too much delay. Carol Huss September 5, 6: Jesse Norman You seem to have a big chip on your shoulder concerning Clinton.

Why don't you focus on the present? Jay P September 5, 4: Charles, who are the people? It seems like most of you think that the majority of the country wants impeachment. Maybe the majority of people YOU all know, but not the majority in the country. Selective outrage over corruption gets nowhere because it's just that, selective. Clinton was the most corrupt of any President ever.

Much more corrupt than Bush supposedly is. Clinton did so many things that people don't even remember the majority of them because the sheer number is too voluminous to take in. Clinton was said to have "a scandal a day". That was said by Jerry Brown who ran against him in for the democratic ticket.

It wasn't just about his affairs either. Why don't you all get mad at politicians on both sides who are corrupt? I reckon none of you. I contacted my representatives over this. I also contacted my representatives over the Tom Delay situation. How much outrage was there among you when Gerry Studds had sex with an underage male page and then when re-elected received a standing ovation by the democratic caucus?

William Jefferson also received a standing ovation by the black congressional caucus. Where was the outrage? Democrats will say "well the people of Louisiana re-elected him. Let the process work itself out and see if he is convicted. Then he will be removed". Selective outrage means absolutely nothing because both sides have it. Jesse Norman September 5, 3: Based on all the most recent Presidential approval polls, most citizens would disagree with Rep.

Miller and the Democratic leadership. Now, of course, they claim they were ignorant of the facts leading to the invasion of Iraq. I wonder if they even bothered reading any of the many books and articles suggesting that the invasion of Iraq would be a horrendous mistake and that there was no justification for it.

The Democrats have failed to bring an end to an illegal war, which they promised they would do. They failed to restore our constitutional rights and they failed to bring the perpetrators of war crimes to justice. Rather than address these pressing issues, the Democrats focus solely on who will run for president in When we listen closely to what the candidates are saying we realize they have no plan to end the war.

Our sons and daughters are dying and being seriously wounded on a daily basis in what Rep. Miller admits is an unjustified war.

Members of the legal profession and constitutional scholars have prepared the case. All the Democrats need to do is start the proceedings. Republicans will see which way the wind blows once the evidence is presented and they will be forced to act responsibly or lose future elections.

So what are the Democrats afraid of? They are afraid that if Bush and Cheney were removed from office, Nancy Pelosi would become president and have to deal with the real issue: Instead, they would prefer to allow the war to continue, blame the Republicans for the quagmire in Iraq and walk into power in In the meantime, the criminals are free to continue living the good life, while our soldiers continue to die and become disabled. Smith September 1, 3: That is my point, Jesse, there is no place for complacency whether middle ground or not.

Thank you for your integrity. I just see a lot of corruption in today's world and without firm, decisive actions in leadership or elsewhere like, at least, careful consideration of impeachment and possible removal from office of the President and others we are doomed to fail.

We can do it by being diplomatic I do not have the gift of gab for a lot detail but, with intent as a generalist I can readily focus on the big picture. Carol Huss August 28, You do not seriously think Clinton only lied about sex in the oval office do you?

If Bill Clinton told you the sky was blue, I know you'd look up just to make sure, just as I would. I laid out many things Clinton did and could have listed many more, and they're undeniable.

I won't get into Whitewater even though something wasn't right there, to me it's not an issue. You don't think Clinton had Janet Reno stop those investigations that looked into his dealings on different fronts? Aren't those impeachable offenses? None of those I listed I would consider "Bush-friendly". Jesse Norman August 28, 7: For those who want to do something about impeachment: Sign the petition at http: Over , have already signed.

Dennis Kucinich has spoken out against the Bush administration's war on Iraq and now he is speaking out against war with Iran: There are more reasons than ever to impeach Cheney; many are afraid that he will do anything to pull us into a war with Iran.

And for those who are wondering where the protesters are: There are ongoing protests -- a good place to start is: Stephanie August 28, Bush lied to the American people and the world about the reasons for waging war against another country that was of no imediate threat to the US. Bush circumvented the 4th amendment and continues to put American citizens under surveillance with out warrant. I do not take impeachment lightly, impeaching Clinton In my opinion was politically motivated.

But, in this case I think we are talking about our core freedoms under the constitution. Impeachment was put in place by the founding Fathers as a last resort way for the people to correct the situation when the balance of power becomes so one sided that Democracy is threatened. It is my opinion we are at such a point in History. For me it is not about party bickering. This is about keeping American Democracy and Freedom alive. I agree we don't want to make this a trend.

But that risk is a much less than the current one where the executive branch has more power than is cnstitutionally given or intended. I actually supported Bush in the begainning. Was impressed with hearing him speak in person before the first ellection. And, I was taken in by the lies about Iraq for a while. But it is now clear that there was and continues to be a hidden agenda, one that I do not support. MLM August 27, First of all Jeff, I'm sorry for your health situation.

I myself have chronic kidney failure, so I will be fortunate if I do see Why I have my health problems is because my father was exposed to Agent Orange while he served in Vietnam. Because of his exposure, I have IgA which caused later on proteinuria and hematuria, so I know what you must be going through with your health.

I understood your post just fine. If I worked for the republican party or Rove, I'd have to be a follower. To be totally upfront, I am a registered democrat. The reason why I keep bringing up Clinton's impeachment is because Clinton actually did impeachable things, but there was not a program called "Let's Get The Conversation Rolling About Impeaching Clinton" on any network.

I'm all for letting go of the past, but my point was that this is very hypocritical. Many of the ones who were saying bad things rightfully so about those who wanted Clinton impeached are now talking about impeachng Bush. That's hypocrisy to the Nth degree. People do disagree with leaders of both parties on major issues and still keep their reputation as being honorable people who's not impersonating Joe Bloke while actually working for one of the major parties.

Carol, as far as being in the middle being equal to complacency I fully disagree.

Discipline: Now offers elevated

The reality is that the US has caused destruction that destabilizes an entire region, affecting hundreds of millions of lives.

The reality is that the neocons continue a drumbeat of war to renew their coffers. The reality is that the current administration uses terror as tool, no less so than the terrorists they purport to battle. There is an elemental wisdom that transcends time and place. That wisdom offered by Socrates, Buddha, Confucious and others is that we should ask questions, of ourselves and of society. For knowledge, for enlightenment, for responsibility, we must question. In light of this simple wisdom, we must ask questions of our leaders.

Why was French intelligence ignored? Why did the towers collapse like a controlled demolition. Why were there no explosives forensics allowed on the rubble. Why was there a powerdown of security systems prior to the attack. Why were bomb sniffing dogs removed. There are so many questions unanswered, so much debate silenced under the the suffocating muffle of flag and cross.

We repeat history's mistakes. A nation stands by as innocents die. Was Nazi Germany so different? Is our jingoism and religious fervor no less manipulated? When we stop questioning, when we allow debate to be controlled by an elite cadre of avarice, we allow atrocities to be committed. Nor has it been held accountable for the crimes it has committed in Iraq. Why is the question we should all be asking. I'm dismayed, however, that you have not incorporated any of the dozens and dozens of questions being posed by the Truth.

Polls are registering huge percentages of people who believe that key members of the American government were complicit in the attack http: Many of the brightest technical minds are on board with this. Many key people in positions of authority are also. These latter two issues are frequent topics on your program. It is a brave step, but it is one that could lead to the real truth, the truth that we must have. Please do not dismiss the questions, nor the inconvenient answers until you have read the arguments.

Droves and droves of people are seeing the light as I see it. Please come along with us on this quest. Jade September 21, Jesse, you refuse to believe the obvious when it comes to Bush but quickly believe anything negative about Clinton. As an independent I hold all accountable.

September 21, Jesse Norman September 21, 8: I am a regular viewer of Bill Moyers Journal and applaud you for giving voice to so many courageous people. Your reality I think is peyote-laced, with all due respect. I think your continual posting of "The real reason we're in Iraq" is something you have saved on your computer and you post that same thing on every blog you find. No way someone repeats themselves like that in verbatim unless they have it saved.

If that's true, then that's really disturbing. You can have your own take on reality. I want no part of it. Jesse Norman September 20, 1: Go ahead and live with your attitude against Clinton if it makes you happy. If you have time open your mind up to reality. Jay P September 18, I hate people that's the one true emotion that calls me out to challenge them to a difficult round of it I was born to stick the needle in the balloon heads of the world You guys really are funny with your views.

What if I don't get rid of the chip on my shoulder over Clinton? Jay P, if you were speaking on this thread you'd sound like a tape recorder. This is the third time you've said that same exact thing, one on another thread. Guess what I asked three times to you Jesse Norman September 18, Jesse Norman You seem to make many assumptions when it relates to Clinton but are very defensive with Bush.

Get rid of the big chip on your shoulder. An influential group of conservatives convinced President George W. Bush that it was in America's best interests to conquer Iraq as a first step toward dominating the oil-producing nations in the Middle East.

There was no "exit plan" because we never intended to exit. The plan was, and is, to build military bases in Iraq and stay there forever. Our leaders see Iraq as a place to make money. Jay P September 17, 5: If you have not let your congress critters know your views on impeaching the current occupant and his puppet master I strongly encourage you to do so. If you do not know how to contact these people here is a URL that will help resolve that small item http: Let your elected officials know what you are thinking and what you'd like them to do, while there is still time and before all your rights are taken away by the imperial shrub.

Steve S September 17, 4: While the Congress hesitates to impeach the President and Vice President, what are the alternatives for citizens who think that the President and Vice President have committed crimes against the nation? For instance, is making a collective citizen's arrest a possibility? Indeed, the laws of citizens arrest appear to be predicated upon the effectiveness of the Second Amendment.

Simply put, without firepower, people are less likely going to be able to make a citizen's arrest. A random sampling of the various states as well as the District of Columbia indicates that a citizen's arrest is valid when a public offense was committed in the presence of the arresting private citizen or when the arresting private citizen has a reasonable belief that the suspect has committed a felony, whether or not in the presence of the arresting citizen.

If committing a felony is the benchmark for determining whether a crime has been committed, are violations of their oath of office felonies. For instance, if they violated their oath to support and defend the constitution of the United States, is that violation a felony? Roger Chapanis September 16, Although I don't feel he did enough if anything at all to prevent it, Al Qaeda was hitting us all over the world when Clinton was in office and Clinton did absolutely nothing about any attack.

Failed to kill Osama: Here's something you won't like reading though. Sudan offered Clinton three times for them to capture Bin Laden, ship him to Saudi Arabia where we could then take him. Clinton said "we can't get him on anything under international law" so he refused. He denies this, but he was caught on audio tape not only getting these offers but declining. Manipulating emotion for Iraq war: I totally disagree, but that's just my opinion as it is yours.

Blaming Katrina on Bush is just foolish. While he may have not acted quick enough, the citizens who were trapped in New Orleans were supposed to have been evacuated. Mayor Nagin released a free dvd a year before Katrina saying if there was a Cat. Those who had no way of leaving would have school buses escort them out of the city. This didn't happen in Katrina. New Orleans didn't evacuate and the buses were left under the water just like everything else. Is Bush supposed to tell the mayor and governor to evacuate their own citizens?

No, that's their job. Blaming Bush for this is ludicrous. Bush is President and can nominate who he wants. Corruption in congress is Bush's fault?

Republicans had Abramov and the democrats have Hsu. Hsu was a fugitive from the law for larceny when he did his fundraising. The addresses of those who donated, collected by Hsu gave as much as many of their homes were worth.

I'll skip down to global warming: Did you know Mars is warming even at a faster rate than Earth? NASA came to that conclusion because of Mars' polar caps. When I was a kid I remember the consensus among scientists was that we were in an ice age. Made the cover of Time magazine even. Since they have talked about global warming for the last twenty years or better, that means within a decade scientists went from ice age to global warming.

How does that happen? Can man create such a warming? Only the Sun can. That explains the warming of Mars too, unless you believe Bush is warming Mars by lasers. Most of these are too easy, but you get my point. I can play these games all you want. Gotta do better than this. Dividing our nation happened when the left cried about how Al lost the election with all of those silly allegations about how Bush stole it. Even Bill Maher admitted nothing illegal or wrong happened and he hates Bush. Those votes in Florida with the hanging chads were counted by the press.

According to the media who was in on the counting, Bush gained votes, not lost them. They probably wanted Gore to win in their count because that would have been a huge story. Bush gaining votes obviously wasn't. Who's not going to know? She even said she doesn't know whether or not she was undercover at that time. Did you watch her testimony on Capitol Hill? Sorry, had to get to a few more. Carol, the info I got I found online which was done by the media research center.

Glad you don't like the extremist views because a lot do. Jesse Norman September 15, 2: Deep Throat September 15, We do agree on some things. You have a point. Personally, I take extremist comments with a grain of salt. I don't believe we had much choice but, to trust the President's decision to go to war based on what he and the media presented. If it's technically a war, a not is debatable.

I don't know where you are getting your information but, I understood Moyer's to say that the D. At any rate, I don't believe anything should be based on surface value and find a complex world deserves better. The transparency we often hear about and that is so desperately needed becomes the center when we turn away from lies and deception in times of desperation or otherwise.

It starts with each of us me. September 14, 7: Finally we seem to agree on something Carol. There is another thread on here from a show done by Moyers about how the press was complicit in convincing the country in going to war in Iraq. Of course many people actually bought this. No one in the press was "afraid" to criticize Bush because they have done it from day one.

Is that a bad thing? No, of course not. But Moyers trying to convince people the press was Bush's right hand man is ludicrous. There's further evidence of the liberal bias in the media when Moveon. The Times gave some bs excuse as to why they did, but anyone with any keen sense could see through that. Carol, your point to me beforehand was that the press wasn't honest.

Which side were they going towards dishonesty? It would be the left wouldn't it? Obviously the NY Times weren't thinking of profits when it gave Moveon. Obviously the print media isn't thinking about profits since their bias has turned many away from buying newspapers. Actually they can't resist themselves. Newspaper subscriptions are dwindling by the day.

I don't think they really care about profits because their profits are down. I'm a realist and I don't try to see things just to validate my own opinion. I don't twist and turn things to suit my suspicions. I don't cheat myself with that kind of logical thinking. MLM you said you were a republican for many years but hated the rhetoric of the right.

Have you heard of the rhetoric on the left, which is by far worse than the right? What happened this week when democratic politicians accused the General of the same thing as the Moveon ad did was despicable.

You had a compulsive liar in Hillary Clinton call an honored General a liar. Dems all over the place called him a liar after many sang his praises as they casted their vote. None of them dared to question Petraeus as to why he would lie and then soon send off his own son to Iraq. When Bill Clinton was called a murderer by the far right over the death of Vince Foster, the republicans denounced it. How many times have you heard Bush called "a nazi" or "Hitler", yet the democrats are loudly silent.

Listen to the rhetoric on the left and see how it's NOT denounced. Wait til '08 and see the rhetoric on the left with a more powerful Moveon machine. You might have heard in the '00 election about how if you vote for Bush another black church will burn. That will be nothing.

When the american people see the rhetoric on the far left and see how it's not denounced by dems and vote for the republican, I really see Moveon. They do say they have bought and paid for the democratic party. I have to agree with them. Jesse Norman September 14, 1: Blogs can be addicting but, please, pace yourself. I believe your input is quite valuable and wouldn't want to lose touch.

I believe that there are more that strive for the center are in more numbers than we've heard from or about. It gives me a sense of hope. Carol Huss September 13, 9: Today the press and the media have been consolidated into huge Corporations.

The driving force is profit, shareholders, and stock prices. If anything they have all shifted to the right, because the right is completely pro business and deregulation. One thing for sure, the idea that the media plays a valuable roll in keeping democracy in check is lost. The reason this blog appears so one-sided is that it seems to be the only place where this point of view can see the light of day. I am not excited about either party either.

But not participating is NO option. My family heritage goes back, on at least three branches, to the 16 and 17 hundreds on these shores. Radical passionate individualism just runs in the family. My political strategy at this point is to use my vote to try and bring the pendulum back closer to the center.

MLM September 13, 9: Thanks for your comments, MLM. I'm glad you just took a break and weren't away for long. Sadly, I'm not very impressed with any of the politicians. Right now I don't see myself at any party affiliation. Facilitating the truth in for democracy and freedom takes a joint effort in diplomacy and understanding without deception. It is a process that requires civil contemplation and debate.

The occurances and exposure of that is, sadly, not a standard that is used enough today. We all have choices as well as responsibilities that must be addressed. Jesse, I don't know anyone is naive here except maybe the politicans, if they think the lies and deception will work for them, at least, in the long run.

Carol Huss September 13, 7: You know I grew up believeing this BS about the press. This is the debate that is truly irrelevant and trivial -- this seeking to demonize the opposition. It is a totally non-productive debate that diverts the masses from debating the real issues that affect our lives.

In order for America to work, it takes both the Left and the Right. And, I say that not out of what I hear from the press but by the language of the automated phone calls and letters soliciting donations from the Republican Party. I was a card-carrying member until recently Also I receive this same rhetoric from my Republican representatives when they respond to my letters. Having been a conservative for 52 years, it is the Right Wing Rhetoric that has changed my viewpoint.

Everything about the current regime is about shutting down debate by demonizing anyone that disagrees. I have lived through total Democratic control and now total Republican control. I speak from my own experience, I personally have NEVER experienced fear that my fundamental constitutional freedoms were in jeopardy until today -- freedom of speech, separation of church and state which is the fundamental key to freedom of religion , freedom to be secure in my affairs under the 4th amendment.

I see all of these eroding into an Elitist Theocracy reminiscent of 18th Century England -- conservative vs. MLM September 13, 4: Well I'm not naive. I realize we don't live in Utopia where everything is at it seems or right.

My friends think I'm actually quite savvy. Even the liberal ones. A lot don't like what I have to say, but they definitely respect what I say since they do know I know what I am talking about. Hey, it's a gift. I know most on here won't agree with this, but the press mostly is left leaning.

This story and others on PBS are just a small example. I don't either because it never happened. MSNBC collected data on journalists who made donations from the through the start of the campaigns, gave to democrats or liberal causes while only 16 gave to republicans. When asked "generally speaking do you consider yourself a democrat, republican, independent, or something else?

Foxnews does lean to the right. The only reason why they look so far right though is because everyone else leans left. No one would care if Foxnews leaned to the right except they are doing very well in the ratings. See how I'm willing to admit Foxnews leans to the right? Will anyone else here admit most of the media leans to the left?

Who's the naive one? Jesse Norman September 13, 6: What I would like to know is A new administration would at least give us hope for peace, if, and maybe if, we can show them by example. Carol Huss September 12, Jesse Norman September 11, Looks like they posted my comment afterall, only a day after I sent it. I'm sure some postings don't get through for whatever reasons but if you look at the other threads and it's at least against Bush or the war. I've also seen the wackiest contributions on here as well.

A lot of anti-Israeli sentiment, too. Yeah, blame the only civilized country in the region for protecting it's sliver of land against the continent scale lands of arabia. Didn't know you were dyxlexic. In my first post I did ask if you meant WWII and really didn't know what you meant about "freighting".

I assumed "frightening" but didn't know. I am sure your posts not getting uploaded is due to user error, the same has happened to my post and I never took it personally, as I have reposted from a word document and they uploaded just fine. Thank you for pointing out my typos, and obvious problem with dyslexia.

I really appreciate that, so kind of you. I listened to him with my own two ears. He clearly connected the two and NO one would have made that connection with out the Bush propaganda. But I am sure you hung on his every word and were able to catch his every speech.

Show me the evidence that Saddam and Al Qaeda were connected, because the opinions and reports I have listened to say differently. The nonpartisan analysis that seems most reasonable points out that Saddam saw Bin Lauden as a threat to his power, he was much too paranoid of a dictator to allow Al Qaeda to operate out of Iraq.

In my opinion this rings true. Saddam was focused on two things, the local power play to control the Persian Gulf between Iran, Saudi Arabia and himself and his insane tribal hatred for his own citizens.

These two things are what prompted him to invade Kuwait, which prompted the first Gulf War. He wanted Kuwait because the other two major players control so much more coastline and this inhibits his ability to compete in shipping his oil. Saddam was an insane, ruthless and evil character with no redeeming qualities. I am sure he is burning in hell. But, it is quite likely he never really had plans to attack the US, his neighbors for sure, but the US … his world was much, much too small.

Oh and by the way, I never supported, liked or voted for Bill Clinton. In my opinion he is just another sleazy Politician who cannot control his behavior. I have always agreed that he inherited the good economy rather than create it. Passing the looming crises on to Bush. This is why I defended Bush in the beginning. But, I also do not think that anyone, including the terrorist could have anticipated what actually happened — the two buildings collapsing.

So blaming in hindsight is really not a productive thing to do. I still believe that if we give up our most basic freedoms we have let the terrorist win. And I still believe this is what is happening.

This administration response is DEAD wrong as far as I am concerned and rather that winning the war on terror we are just fanning the flames, giving justification to their hatred and feeding our own irrational fear. I am really honest when I say I would rather die in another terrorist attack than to give up my basic liberty under the Constitution and live in a country that is not free. MLM September 9, 9: I guess I'll have to repeat what I tried to send earlier but wasn't posted.

I think it was my nicest post too. Weird that I have read some postings calling Bush a murderer made it with no problem. No bias at all though. It never happened, so what the poll shows is people will believe anything and certainly will believe what they want to believe. I can read postings here and say it's definitely not a one-sided flaw.

What the Bush administration however said was there was a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda, which there was. It is evident from the documents we've recovered as well as the knowledge that Al Zarqawi was treated in Baghdad before the war.

As far as comparing war speeches go, you can do that with anyone. You have to be smarter than that. What are speeches that rally people to war supposed to sound like? It doesn't even have to be about war. I bet if I had to I can find similar statements from Reagan and Ghandi.

Were Ghandi and Reagan alike? What does 'freighting' mean? You lost me there. Hitler wasn't around in WWI either. I do strongly agree that the administration was very adamant about admitting mistakes, which made things worse. Rumsfeld was horrible and I celebrated the day he finally resigned.

If I had more money I might have even invited all of you. Okay, I wouldn't have. I've never done drugs and I don't want to get a contact high. I guess also Jay P. Jesse Norman September 9, 2: In an effort to rally support for a war, any speech will have similarities. That's just common sense. If I had to I could point out things how Reagansaid things that sounded like Ghandi. See, one can do that without comparing speeches on war, so that means nothing.

Were Reagan and Ghandi two peas in a pod? Did you mean WWII? Because Hitler wasn't anything in WWI. As far as the poll goes people will believe what they want to believe. What you accuse the administration of doing is simply not true. They did say there was a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda which was true.

The more time went by the more documents were found linking them together. Al Zarqawi was in Iraq before the war and received treatment on a wounded leg in Baghdad. There are other things linking Saddam with Al Qaeda which you can find on the net.

If anything the administration didn't differentiate one terrorist or terrorist organization from the other, which it shouldn't do. There are many with the same objective and there's no amount of appeasement that will make them change their minds. While I agree we should have concentrated more on getting Bin Laden, the status quo of the Iraqi situation was unacceptable. The UN loved Saddam despite his crimes because they got money and cheap oil.

Who are the real criminals? Who really should be impeached? Why does the UN even exist when it runs away from its own charter time and time again? My question for all of you is do you believe we should go into Darfur even if and when the UN says 'no, we won't do anything'? Jesse Norman September 8, 2: Several people have objected to the comparison of this Administration and Hitler.

I agree that this is a strong statement and of course has a strong element of hyperbole. I in no way wish to say that the leadership in Washington even comes close to that level of insanity and evil. Still there are, I believe some freighting similarities, in the tactics and inflammatory rhetoric that have and continue to come from this Administration. The use of fear for persuasion, the demonizing of opponents, the unwillingness to admit mistakes, the refusal to change the tone of this rhetoric even after it was made clear that the basis for entry was false…is what concerns me most.

Neither of which has been proven true. This belief was fostered by this Administration. This is clearly, in my opinion, cause for alarm. I cannot say why this Administration was so intent on attacking a country that, no matter how evil and corrupt it was, did nothing to provoke our attack. And posed no immediate danger to the US. I am reading a book about WWI at the moment. In it are several quotes form Hitler, to me there are obvious similarities to the tactics used by this Administration to sell this War.

The vector will not be asked afterwards whether he told the truth or not. When starting and waging war, it is not right that matters by victory. MLM September 8, Jesse Norman September 7, Sorry, to intrude Jay P but, you might be over simplifying the situation. I'm glad the military study came out in the news today that we need to take "lighter steps" in Iraq and move closer to ending the war without occupation and it's a relief to hear from hearts that may be in the right place.

How the President responds seems to be the difference between him being able to then keep his job to the end of this term or not. It'll be interesting how it plays out. It also seems that the executive branch is watering down the responsibilities of the legislative and judicial branches as well Carol Huss September 6, 6: Jesse Norman Thanks for your comments. Let me ask you this, if this war was started so Bush and Co.

Jay P September 6, 4: Jay P, where is your evidence of this? You know what evidence is, right? I can make up stuff all I want too but just because I can come up with it in my mind, it doesn't make it fact. Please tell us if you were a fly on the wall when all of this was supposedly discussed. I'd be interested in reading it. I'm tired of all this "American imperialism" talk.

Name a country we have really taken over and kept. I don't recall ever hearing the saying "the sun never sets on america". If we went into Iraq because of oil, then how come oil is so high-priced throughout the world, not just in our country.

Why do I have a big chip on my shoulder because of Clinton? Because he was very corrupt and I'm sure hardly any of you actually accept that he was. The only thing he really got credit for was a good economy and that was falsely accredited. He was just president at the right time with the internet boom. Just as he was leaving we had the internet bust. Al Gore should have gotten the credit for the economy since he invented the internet. Carol, you make a very good point. One side pits against the other almost like in a play.

There's the good side and the bad side. Each side sees the other as the bad side, although I never heard Clinton compared to Hitler on the right like Bush has been nearly on a daily basis. It's almost like it's a setup.

While most of America is in the middle, both parties play to their bases and nothing gets done. They worry more about playing "gotcha" than solving our nation's problems. My points have been consistent that selective anger does nothing because both sides have it. When a president is elected, he will have selective outrage pitted against him. That's the state of our country right now. If we left Iraq right now, what happened in Vietnam after we left would pale in comparison.

You can argue whether or not we should have gone in and if we screwed up or not. Saying Bush lied though is delusional considering every democrat who said Saddam had WMD's along with every country in the world, Clinton, and Hans Blix must have been in on the lie.

We all know that's not true I hope. Jesse Norman September 6, 1: It's obviously too easy to point fingers and take sides. Does truth in democracy and freedom require that we choose either Democrats or Republicans? I'm glad the discussion goes on. As far as what the majority thinks or does about impeachment now or what was previously done remains to be seen. Fighting a war is part of a process.

There are battles won and lost, a journey. Is it our place to make Iraq a US occupation? The need for it remains to be seen. It's only then that will we find our destiny whether to end the war or not. We have not found the necessary leadership with the UN? Discussion and Debate has it's purpose yet, let's not expect the required action to be proficiently done with too much delay.

Carol Huss September 5, 6: Jesse Norman You seem to have a big chip on your shoulder concerning Clinton. Why don't you focus on the present? Jay P September 5, 4: Charles, who are the people? It seems like most of you think that the majority of the country wants impeachment. Maybe the majority of people YOU all know, but not the majority in the country. Selective outrage over corruption gets nowhere because it's just that, selective.

Clinton was the most corrupt of any President ever. Much more corrupt than Bush supposedly is. Clinton did so many things that people don't even remember the majority of them because the sheer number is too voluminous to take in.

Clinton was said to have "a scandal a day". That was said by Jerry Brown who ran against him in for the democratic ticket. It wasn't just about his affairs either.

Why don't you all get mad at politicians on both sides who are corrupt? I reckon none of you. I contacted my representatives over this. I also contacted my representatives over the Tom Delay situation. How much outrage was there among you when Gerry Studds had sex with an underage male page and then when re-elected received a standing ovation by the democratic caucus?

William Jefferson also received a standing ovation by the black congressional caucus. Where was the outrage? Democrats will say "well the people of Louisiana re-elected him. Let the process work itself out and see if he is convicted. Then he will be removed".

Selective outrage means absolutely nothing because both sides have it. Jesse Norman September 5, 3: Based on all the most recent Presidential approval polls, most citizens would disagree with Rep.

Miller and the Democratic leadership. Now, of course, they claim they were ignorant of the facts leading to the invasion of Iraq. I wonder if they even bothered reading any of the many books and articles suggesting that the invasion of Iraq would be a horrendous mistake and that there was no justification for it.

The Democrats have failed to bring an end to an illegal war, which they promised they would do. They failed to restore our constitutional rights and they failed to bring the perpetrators of war crimes to justice.

Rather than address these pressing issues, the Democrats focus solely on who will run for president in When we listen closely to what the candidates are saying we realize they have no plan to end the war.

Our sons and daughters are dying and being seriously wounded on a daily basis in what Rep. Miller admits is an unjustified war. Members of the legal profession and constitutional scholars have prepared the case. All the Democrats need to do is start the proceedings. Republicans will see which way the wind blows once the evidence is presented and they will be forced to act responsibly or lose future elections. So what are the Democrats afraid of? They are afraid that if Bush and Cheney were removed from office, Nancy Pelosi would become president and have to deal with the real issue: Instead, they would prefer to allow the war to continue, blame the Republicans for the quagmire in Iraq and walk into power in In the meantime, the criminals are free to continue living the good life, while our soldiers continue to die and become disabled.

Smith September 1, 3: That is my point, Jesse, there is no place for complacency whether middle ground or not. Thank you for your integrity. I just see a lot of corruption in today's world and without firm, decisive actions in leadership or elsewhere like, at least, careful consideration of impeachment and possible removal from office of the President and others we are doomed to fail.

We can do it by being diplomatic I do not have the gift of gab for a lot detail but, with intent as a generalist I can readily focus on the big picture. Carol Huss August 28, You do not seriously think Clinton only lied about sex in the oval office do you? If Bill Clinton told you the sky was blue, I know you'd look up just to make sure, just as I would.

I laid out many things Clinton did and could have listed many more, and they're undeniable. I won't get into Whitewater even though something wasn't right there, to me it's not an issue. You don't think Clinton had Janet Reno stop those investigations that looked into his dealings on different fronts?

Aren't those impeachable offenses? None of those I listed I would consider "Bush-friendly". Jesse Norman August 28, 7: For those who want to do something about impeachment: Sign the petition at http: Over , have already signed.

Dennis Kucinich has spoken out against the Bush administration's war on Iraq and now he is speaking out against war with Iran: There are more reasons than ever to impeach Cheney; many are afraid that he will do anything to pull us into a war with Iran.

And for those who are wondering where the protesters are: There are ongoing protests -- a good place to start is: Stephanie August 28, Bush lied to the American people and the world about the reasons for waging war against another country that was of no imediate threat to the US.

Bush circumvented the 4th amendment and continues to put American citizens under surveillance with out warrant. I do not take impeachment lightly, impeaching Clinton In my opinion was politically motivated.

But, in this case I think we are talking about our core freedoms under the constitution. Impeachment was put in place by the founding Fathers as a last resort way for the people to correct the situation when the balance of power becomes so one sided that Democracy is threatened. It is my opinion we are at such a point in History.

For me it is not about party bickering. This is about keeping American Democracy and Freedom alive. I agree we don't want to make this a trend. But that risk is a much less than the current one where the executive branch has more power than is cnstitutionally given or intended.

I actually supported Bush in the begainning. Was impressed with hearing him speak in person before the first ellection. And, I was taken in by the lies about Iraq for a while.

But it is now clear that there was and continues to be a hidden agenda, one that I do not support. MLM August 27, First of all Jeff, I'm sorry for your health situation. I myself have chronic kidney failure, so I will be fortunate if I do see Why I have my health problems is because my father was exposed to Agent Orange while he served in Vietnam.

Because of his exposure, I have IgA which caused later on proteinuria and hematuria, so I know what you must be going through with your health. I understood your post just fine. If I worked for the republican party or Rove, I'd have to be a follower. To be totally upfront, I am a registered democrat. The reason why I keep bringing up Clinton's impeachment is because Clinton actually did impeachable things, but there was not a program called "Let's Get The Conversation Rolling About Impeaching Clinton" on any network.

I'm all for letting go of the past, but my point was that this is very hypocritical. Many of the ones who were saying bad things rightfully so about those who wanted Clinton impeached are now talking about impeachng Bush. That's hypocrisy to the Nth degree. People do disagree with leaders of both parties on major issues and still keep their reputation as being honorable people who's not impersonating Joe Bloke while actually working for one of the major parties.

Carol, as far as being in the middle being equal to complacency I fully disagree. Although my health keeps me from doing all I want in making my voice heard on issues, I do contact my congressman and senators pretty regularly. My congressman is Visclosky, a democrat, and has done a good job. One of my senators, Bayh has done a great job.

If the democrats were smart, they'd really look into this guy. In order to impeach a president, they must do something REALLY bad in my opinion as is the opinion of most in the country. I don't believe what Bush has done warrants impeachment, and neither did Clinton. It would harm this country greatly to remove a president, and would be the start of a horrible road where impeaching presidents would be an issue with EVERY president from then on.

Do you want to go down that road? Jesse Norman August 25, 3: It actually gives me the "warm fuzzies" to read a blog that attracts so many educated participants. Several nights ago, I had the pleasure of attending a lecture given by the lead attorney for Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the case that challenged the constitutionality of military trials at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Neal Katyal won that case and his remarkable lecture truly gave me hope. Katyal reminded us that Hamdan, a man with a fourth grade education who served as bin Laden's driver, was able to sue the two most powerful men in the world, Bush and Rumsfeld, and win. While I am disheartened that the suit was won only after a man who should have had a presumption of innocence had served years in Gitmo, suffering isolation, a lack of representation, and what anyone subjected to it would call torture, he did win.

After the lecture the host reminded us that the kind of freedoms we have taken for granted do not represent the systems under which most of the world lives now or ever has.

There have only a handful of times in history when free societies flourished. They have been few and infrequent and have never lasted more than a few hundred years. The general thinking of the American citizen is that things are cyclical and that this too shall pass. History does not support that view. History reveals that the freedom we have is a fragile thing that will vanish if not vigorously defended.

If we allow what has happened over the last few years to go without serious consequence, we will lose the America we cherish. Impeachment is the only means by which we can declare that the actions of this administration are unacceptable and will not be allowed now or in the future. We failed to make this distinction when we accepted the pardon of Richard Nixon. That was a mistake for which we are now paying.

Compared to Watergate, the crimes of this administration, violation of the constitution they were sworn to uphold, violation of U. Many of you will undoubtedly think to yourselves "I can't believe she said that in a public venue!

That said, I believe the future of our nation is at stake. I hope everyone reading this will speak out, write the papers, call your elected representatives and remind them of the oath of office they swore. That cannot happen with Alberto Gonzales in the office of the Attorney General operating under the mistaken belief that it is his job to protect and defend the incompetence and arrogance of the man who sits in the office of the presidency.

I know I am preaching to the choir and for that I apologize. If your town existed back in , you probably have at least one WPA project in your community. We can do the same today. We need new infrastructure, and we need to upgrade or repair existing facilities. We can simultaneously train a new generation of workers for careers in the sustainable energy industry.

The WPA also hired writers, artists, poets, historians, and so on. Throwing money at the rich has never helped once. Well, consumer demand will be depressed until people get back to work. I have never wanted to throw bricks at my TV before, I will have to control myself though because it is a fairly nice TV.

Maybe if I threw a brick at my TV that would help the U. One way to fix this nation is to reduce the power of the corporation. Our government leaders and representatives are caught up in the special interests of banks and corporations. A bought government is not one that serves the people of America. And it is not only our government. Multinational corporations dominate the decision-making processes of the world. So we need a leader to get tough with corporations.

Threaten them if they refuse to hire, despite financial recovery via the taxpayer, or continue to ship jobs overseas. Pull the plug on their charter if they continue to show such rash disregard for Americans. The corporation must become a means to close the ever-growiing disparity between rich and poor, and not an end in itself. Civility is at risk of total collapse if we do not act. To expand upon the suggestion to provide public financing for elections, I would advocate a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on both members of the US House of Representatives and the US Senate.

Any candidate for either legislative body would be limited to a total of 6 years in office — 3 two year terms for members of the House and two 3 year terms for the US Senate. The objective of this amendment would be to greatly reduce if not eliminate, the influence of lobbies and political influence in Congressional actions.

Finally, Congressional representatives would be provided retirement benefits via a K rather than a defined benefit plan and would be required to contribute and benefit from the Social Security program as is the norm for the vast majority of American workers. I believe these changes will result in legislation that reflects the true voice of the people of the US and will allow us to come to grips with the great challenges facing our country today. Find a way to fix the global economic imbalance.

Even as China owns so much of our debt — and undervalues their own currency — they keep selling to us more and more. Tariffs are a naughty word because other nations will simply impose their own, but perhaps a consumption tax might cause Americans to consume less and invest more.

Ideally, Americans need to start selling our goods overseas more but our legacy costs, etc. But, it would be better to develop foreign markets than reduce American wages. Pam, please think about what you are advocating with term limits.

Your argument for them makes absolutely no sense. They will self aggandise themselves even worse than they do now. There are already term limits possible for crappy legislators, it is called intelligent and informed voters. I should like to correct my previous post: I think too many special interests, too much influence of congress, too many handouts, the social security system is broke, too many ineffective programs. So here are my radical ideas: All citizens over 18 receive a monthly stipend of?

No one will get rich and no one will starve. A national sales tax of? Imported items have an extra? Foreign transfers to be taxed at? An annual tax of? Medicare for everybody paid for by items 2 and 3. Private insurance companies are contracted to insure a population — county? The focus being on preventative rather than acute care as a flat amount is contracted per person. Profits of the insurance company to be capped at?

All citizens are entitled to trimester credits of free post secondary education including books, lab fees, etc. In other words a free bachelor degree. Reduce the departments to core functions: Eliminate Housing, Labor, Agricuture etc. This will take some discussion. Eliminate or reduce all federal employee pension programs.

This would have to be phased in over 30 years to be fair to existing employees. Reduce, through attrition, the size of the federal government employee base.

There will be no need for these employees. Eliminate corporate subsidies — ethanol, tobacco, agriculture, etc. States are responsible for education, local highways, local highways, etc. Item 1 eliminates welfare, item 5 eliminate Medicaid or similar.

This is just a start. Its radical and our relationship with the federal government will be completely revised as will the motive base of our leaders to us.

Thank you for your consideration of these ideas. You would not just term limit lousy ones. Some are actually good and do the right thing as well as honor their oath to uphold the Constitution, sure there are darn few but would you not want to hold on to them?

I concure, we need to get away from giving people money just just because they are out of work or do not have medical issurance. Instead, have the cityh, state, govt give people jobs and make them earn that money we now give them anyway, but now have them do work around the country in the area they are trained in, this keeps people up on their education while giving schools people to assist or cities extra people to clean up the streets, or brick layers putting up walls, put the people to work and not give money away just because?

Another way to fix America is to examine our tax structure. The American economy was pretty good from the s to the s. During that time, we had plenty of money to pay for important public services.

We always have the chance to vote people out of office. But term limits make it impossible to keep good people in. Consider the case of Brian X. Throughout his political career, the same word has followed him: He served in the Brookhaven Town government. Although the town government was long a hotbed of corruption, he went untainted, and was broadly respected by Democrats and Republicans alike.

Then he went to the Suffolk County Legislature, where he served until he was term-limited out of office. So when ho was term-limited out, we sent him to the NYS Senate. He was voted out this year for a single issue — his opposition of a tax rebate program that was over-priced, largely worthless, and ammounted to little more than a program to provide easy votes for incumbents.

He voted his conscience, and was sent packing. One way I would fix America is by exposing the foolishness and fallacy of what most conservatives spew as truth. Your guy who would fix America by giving everyone vouchers lives in a magical world where people, by default, act rationally.

Any look at actual data of human behavior shows that people have a high tendency to be guided by emotion. People with vouchers will be at least as likely to use them to buy lottery tickets as they are to buy milk.

Untill Lincoln the first republican President the words national and federal were not used commonly in reference to government agenceys or indpendent groups. I believe the one best change to make to fix America is to limit senators and congressmen to two terms, just like the limit on the presidency. This would reduce considerably the big money corporate influence on our politicians.

When corporations give money to politicial campaigns it causes special interest and almost always is a determent to the American citizen. Here in a Kentucky electric book was mentioned how a Nebraskan US Senator as being key to the passage and development of TVA program and spear heading the rural electrification program.

Did you think he knew child labor? Became a country teacher, a small town lawyer, local prosecuting attorney then judge. George Norris as the local judge saw a growing pattern of farm foreclosures and lost homesteads and farmers and their hands forced into the cities and further unemployment. This was the time of the robber barons. Here Kentucky there was tobacco barons, which often set tobacco prices, well below the costs to grow that tobacco. This was wiping out small farmers and the barons then scooped up their farms on pennies on the dollar, same was going on all over.

Judge Norris knew what hard work farming really was and soon he ran as a Republican Reformer. What is the one thing that helps you get folks vote? We have to do that the hard way. That is why there are so many attack ads! Do you think normal folks can weather the amount of attack ads leveled this election? But in this election there was nothing and no rules. Do you think a lame duck Congress is going to push for reform?

Would you write your Congressman and Senator for such a reform? I, as a young boy, having seen the career of another fiscally conservative, Bill Proxmire Dem of Wisconsin, because my grandfather helped him get into the US Senate. He had failed to become Governor of Wisconsin and wanted to run again for the post. My grandfather talked him into running for the US Senate seat instead.

I think one of the first things you have to look at is the constitution. It can not be static but has to be dynamics to reflect the times we live in.

A good example is the preacher in Florida who treaten the security of a nation, but because of the constitution f cluases government could not have step in to stop him. One way of doing that might be to do away with elections and make it like jury duty for a few months per year. Lets get real people in the gov. Stop wasting money on elections. Also, set the federal and state governments on a percentage based budget — i. They cannot spend more than comes in.

Fix the percent tax at one point and leave it alone. Wild growth is what cancer does i. For a change we could give up being total idiots! All this dealing just asks for corruption.

If individual Americans want to help others let them, but get the dang gov out of the foreign aid business. Limit government to exact specific functions, keep it small, and leave it alone. This could be accessed by anyone who needs to know the best that humans understand in all areas of interest.

What the heck is the big hurry to destroy everything in sight? Stop paving the world. This is not progress it is greed. Systems based on chasing money and greed cannot be the best — get real. It seems that the what we call capitalism should really be called rape. Plus it would save all that energy. You have a very good point, especially in regards to mental health services.

So many receiving ssd, housing, free very costly medications manage to screw up everything by taking other illegal drugs. This is as as insane as these people we waste billions on. And everyother person you meet has bi-polar disorder. No ONE thing will fix America.

First of all, we have become The Divided States of America. Something legal in one state is illegal in the next. They are stuck in a vicious or deadly cycle. Have food stamp cards that issue only a balanced portion of each food group-not excessive candy and soda, etc. Build orphanages instead of prisons. Good parenting is learned. If a pedophile shows up- hang him.

Build factories in small towns again- utilizing local talent and energies. And with the money mom and dad are making working- they can buy that weekend outfit- to let them and their friends go to the dance hall - that local tax dollars help build - to shake off some excess teenage energy.

Let overweight community members use it also. Have huge indoor areas to farm locally- during inclement weather. Get rid of tenure for teachers. What purpose does it really serve? Modern day forensics have made it way easier to catch criminals. Deal with it- no lengthy trial. Make Dental care available and affordable for everyone. This problem stems back for years. Years of career politicians in both houses. These career politicians have turned their backs on the people they are sworn to serve and instead serve the wealthy and the big corporations who roam the halls of our legislative buildings with pockets full of money, luxury vacations and bribes to buy the votes on legislation that favors their insatiable greed.

Our public servants have willingly given large tax breks to corporations who send American jobs overseas and have continued to provide a loophole where these same companies are allowed to funnel profits earned here in the States out of this country so it is not taxed.

Despite the suffering by the working people of this country in the toughest times since the great depression our career politicians still thumb their noses at their consitiuents. What did they care, really? They are elected to office and have a job with a regular paycheck coming in to keep food on their tables!

When will we as a nation ever learn? We need to start with a clean slate!!! Clearly, our elected officials have been and continue to be out of touch with the reality that the rest of us must live each and every day.

This is not a game as it appears to be by the actions of our legislators. But because of our arrogance and complacency we are now financially indebeted to China for trillions of dollars.

We could also use the billions of dollars spent on wars around the world. After the capture of Saaddam Hussein we watched the news broadcasts of our soldiers taking possession of so much US money stacked on shipping skids that the soldiers had to use forklifts to load the skids onto semi trucks.

We have never heard of where this money went!! We spent taxpayer money to fight this war and then to rebuild after the destruction and will eventually pay through the nostrils for oil from this same nation!

Greed has consumed America! We blame it on free enterprise but only have to look at our neighbors to the north and be perplexed!

Just look at the drug manufacturers! We have US citizens crossing the border into Canada to get more affordable drugs — not unavailable drugs. Yes, drug companies are ripping off the American people by charging them considerably more for the same drugs that are being sold across the border in Canada for substantially less!

We get receipts every year from the OMB. You can download these reports to your computer and not waste paper, by the ton and dollars by the millions making receipts for everything. Here are some links too you may find useful. Marian, Tons of people would agree with you. Just try to use some common sense and change this and every nut comes out of the woodwork to protest and our incompetent politicians back off.

There are many solutions but no means to make them happen. I teach freshman environmental economics at my local community college in Ft Collins, Colorado, and feel strongly enough on this issue to comment tonight. Their work is highly relevant to your mission, and, in fact, cries out for greater attention for their simple attesting to the truth of how we could move towards greater peace by a better understanding of our history.

I hope you check out their works. There is a school of thought that says: Gas- Transmission fluid- Quart low on Oil…oops? That is why he had the Golden Fleece Award! In Kentucky in my area Lexington, there was hours of attack ads, but only 3. Getting to the root of a political problem is controlling the attack ads and holding TV stations that run those attack ads to run right behind them ads listing their truthfulness and who paid for that ad.

If there is a bunch, guess what a website could be listed in the ad in which contributors would be listed in rank, 1st to last, by amount given. We as consumers of these attack ads have the right to know both and just think of the jobs that would be created!

So how do we stop spending most of our medical funds in the last two months of life? How do we get past the hospitals that make a fortune off these patients? How do we get our politicians from backing off when the ignorant fanatics begin their howling about how we are trying to kill them?

This is not a new idea. Its been around for decades. We seem to be entirely impotent to get any viable solutions to our social and economic problems solved. If I lived on another planet I might have observed that out government is halariously incompetent.

The corrupt part is never funny. This is how we we all go to hell in a handbasket. He examines how changes in the distributions of income and wealth have affected consumer spending patterns and suggests policy reforms to mitigate the harm caused to middle-income families by rising inequality.

Promoting Heterolskedastic growth out of the recession would lower consumption and GDP growth outward from the recession. I reference Korea after This would lead to a longer slower recovery the middle-class is consumption and protecting the middle-class should be the goal of our government. We have for too long sacrificed the middleclass and protected the wealthy. No one at PBS probably has any clue about how much like the blind men and women and the elephant this segment was like.

Each of them with their own limited visions with only a few offering suggestions that would have a major impact. Something that would have a very healthy impact on the U. That would free up jobs for Americans, make foreign countries take care of their own people instead of sending them to the U. For an example of the latter, some politicians look the other way on illegal immigration because they want votes, others look the other way because they receive donations from companies and banks that profit from illegal immigration.

Fighting against that would reduce corruption and make government more accountable to the vast majority of Americans rather than small special interests. The problem, of course, is that PBS is itself too corrupt to have an honest debate about that issue or to hold politicians accountable. If you want to oppose massive public and private corruption and help free up jobs for hundreds of thousands of Americans, help promote that plan.

I would ask all employers to create a schedule for their full time employees to volunteer in public schools 4 hours per month. So many children are failing and need that one-one attention that teachers are unable to give during the school day. I have been amazed at what the presence of a parent evokes in my daughters classmates. We need more involved parents and citizens! Fixing America means more than just blindly fixing unemployment. It means making all workers more competitive in those industries in which America already has or can easily develop significant comparative advantages in the Global Economy.

If you want to bone up on new skills in your industry, or in some other industry that you are passionate about entering, you should be able to access a national Open University, Login, and start taking high quality first-rate classes in any subject of your choice for free!

Why do I think that this would fix America? The focus of Open University courses would be on subjects that would equip students to start export-oriented entrepreneurial businesses; businesses that would export new, innovative products, services and systems to the huge new countries overseas with increasingly affluent middle-class consumers: How would this program be funded, and where would the high-quality professors come from?

Also, maybe major textbook companies could earn corporate tax discounts if they allowed all their state-of-the art texts to be made available free online to Open-University students. Furthermore, maybe Computer software companies would allow Open University students to down-load and use training versions of their software which would expire in say a year, so that lots of new people could very quickly acquire state-of the art technical and programming skills.

The software companies would gain legions of new software users and future customers, and may also save on taxes? How could students earn credentials, and standards be enforced? Maybe there could be national exam centers in each city or state that could allow anyone to pay a nominal exam fee and sit for a proctored exam, and eventually earn a certificate or maybe even a degree! The funds for administration of the computer servers for this open university as well as the advisors could all be from Corporate donors, based on the model used by public television stations, or could use pop-up commercial ads as they do on Face Book, Google and Yahoo?.

This may be naive, but shirking their corporate responsibility to provide free instruction, equipment and entrepreneurial business guidance would result in massive new corporate tax liabilities imposed at either the State or Federal levels!

This blueprint would also return some measure of economic justice to the system of wealth creation that used to be available to Middle class Americans. Certainty about the future price of gasoline would allow Americans to make judicious choices when buying automobiles. Our Trade imbalance would improve, and regimes such as Iran, Venezuela, and Russia would lose much of their economic clout.

Then we can talk about a tax on sugar…. Print lots of money! Of course, no one will loan us any more money, which is good because our government will be forced to live within its means. It will be forced to spend only what it receives in taxes. Imports will be very expensive which will force us all to buy local products. This will make our exports very competitive. SE Asian and Haitian workers crank out widgets for pennies an hour. This policy would be the road to years of subservience to China.

How to fix America? What good are a bunch of ideas unless they are developed, organized and used to form some sort of structure that empowers people. Good Ideas lead to path-breaking new industries like the ones that were created in the s bt Steve Jobs and Buill Gates. I wish I had your faith in the majority. Look at the election and how many people voted against their own self interests.

The best real-life example of a country that squandered its opportunities, that just printed money to produce widgets is Argentina after the first world war.

But then Argentina refused to invest a dime in national brainpower or infrastructure, and is still relegated to its fourth-class status as a commodities and local widgets producer…. Well, hopefully someone influential, wealthy, and very powerful, somewhere in our vast country will read some of these posts and use some of them positively……The authors of this website appear to be genuinely interested in improving America.

You never know who will see these ideas! Forcing everyone to have insurance will just cause more of the same problems that we are all familiar with. I for one would like to see medical cost come down.

Why not pass a law that prevents anyone from having insurance. Costs and the structure of the medical establishment would change overnight.

I think you would quickly begin to see competitive subscription based medicine and we would all benefit if we could suffer the transition. Interestingly enough no one talked about the military, yet the 2 most costly and least effective government funded operations of the decade have been the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

It is widely accepted that both wars are over Oil Iraq and Minerals estimated 1 trillion in Afghanistan , rather than the stabilization of the world.

There are so many atrocities committed by us because of our military attachment to the colonial industrialization of the third world. We need to shutdown and remove all foreign military operations.

All foreign bases, all american troops returned back to their own soil. Maybe then we can truly our example of freedom being a good thing, and maybe then we can fix these domestic problems-i. Without a single exception, all of the selected experts opined without hesitation a remedy for which they neither acknowledged nor explained the source of the malady for which their specific brand of remedy was a sure fired cure.

And yet, with all of their collective knowledge and expertise, not one of them paid any attention to, let alone explained how, or to what extent the Constitution relates to the very issues they rise to address. It never ceases to amaze me how thoughtless the majority of people in this country have become. Their memories are short-lived, and their ability to remain focused on the principles upon which this nation was founded is virtually non-existent. The real malady America faces is the failure of its people to believe that the true source of their strength, protection, and prosperity resides in the very document that binds us all to each other.

The only reason my speech is protected is because your speech is protected. The logic of these fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution is unassailable. The moment we deny anyone the same rights and protections we all believe in, that is the moment we all become slaves to oppression. You want to fix America? Then start believing in, and adhering to the very same ideas and principles the Founding Fathers created and intended to pass on to each and every succeeding generation of Americans.

What we could all use more of is appreciation for what we get from the taxes we pay and empathy for those folks who step up to represent us. The I-Phone comment sounds glib. Maybe we could use less misinformation from both the government and the media and stop looking at these problems as being too complicated or too deeply rooted to be changed.

If that is your feeling, and you do work in government, then maybe it is time for you to look for work in the private sector, because the critics are only going to get worse.

The best way to fix America is to create an enviorment in which the middle class can flourish. If we returned to any of federal income tax rates between and we could put an end to the deficit, balance out Social Security and create a more stable political enviorment for the USA by creating a more robust middle class.

A second idea that goes hand in hand with a return to earlier tax rates is to return to credit card interest deductions on federal income tax.

The people that do are mostly struggling middle class families. We need a commission to investigate and prosecute white collar crime. The lying cheating and stealing has to stop. The laws of the land are not being enforced or punished. Put the offenders in jail.

Sit back and watch the US flourish. Until then, more of the same. I would start by renewing the fairness doctrine. Since the loss of the Fairness Doctrine in , our nation has descended to near civil war. We have corporations like Fox News who benefit from strife and that strife is killing us. We solve nothing but fight everything.

As opposed to discussing the issues of Health Care Reform, we discussed death panels, and not the ones in the insurance companies. That is beneficial for everyone. Also, if tv has to give equal time, then corporations are not encouraged to buy up big blocks of our politicians because all ideas have to get out anyhow. We need to adopt policies and attitudes that minimize harm to people and to the environment.

Currently public policy attempts to harm people who possess and use marijuana. Billions of dollars are spent on police and courts while billions more fund an uncontrolled underground economy which is currently killing tens of thousands of people, many near the US-Mexico boarder.

With a simple change of attitude marijuana can be controlled similar to alcohol and cigarettes. Substantial tax income can be used to fund education and treatment programs to help minimize the social costs. Some people would like to see everyone who receives public assistance be tested for drugs.

The subtext is that we need to weed out the drug users. If we adopt harm reduction as our primary goal all drug use is considered a medical issue. No one gets incarcerated for using drugs. With a simple attitude change we separate the drugs from the guns. Drugs are not the problem. People hurting themselves and others is the problem. People need help with their problems, not threats. The US spends way too much money on the military.

If our primary goal is harm reduction world wide then the use of force is the last option. Trillions of dollars can be saved world wide with much of it coming directly from US tax payers. For every dollar we spend on the military we need to spend a dollar on aid which directly helps people. Real benefit to all people and the environment comes from simply endorsing harm reduction.

If the American people were truly represented by our elected officials,most of these problems would be handled in a way we could all accept. The American political process is out-dated and ineffective. It leaves the American people unrepresented and at the mercy of whoever has the most money to throw around. Since the challenge makes me omnipotent and I can now do things that are not actually possible, I would enact a constitutional amendment that is elegantly simple but would completely change how we govern ourselves and the effectiveness of that governance: That can not be allowed to continue if we really expect our republic to work.

A poor person has one voice. A rich person has one voice. A group of people have a voice for each member. Let their voices be heard and not just their dollars. Needed is a Mandatory program of national service with both civilian and military read draft options — choice left to the citizen.

Civic action begins at home. But first, we need to stop killing people in foreign lands and bring ALL the troops home. How many foreign countries have military installations within the US? This from a 70ish former anti-draft Army lifer. It is critical to get at root causes in any attempt to fix America. We are among the most unequal of all industrialized nations with regard to the ever-growing gap between rich and poor.

Such rampant inequality eventually destroys trust since inherent in such a scheme is the assumption that everyone is out to take advantage of everyone else. Substandard distribution of health care, our broken economic system, our relegation of ethical principles to the shadows and other quality of life indices can be traced to rewarding the greedy among us that is, rewarding inequality and distrust. Corporations dominate and rule without any other motive than short-term profit maximization, rendering any consideration of the higher values of human social life anathema to their ruthless modus operandi.

As long as this paradigm is encouraged to continue, there will be an exponential destruction of equality and trust in our society — not a winning strategy for U. What will our new future be? Suggestion to improve our country: Reinstate the military draft. That would increase employment. It will take a large group of citizens to formulate a doctrine of principles and agree to only vote for those candidates that agree to follow those specific principles.

In other words transparency and integrity. There is not even a decent shoulder when getting out of my neighborhood. It is not safe. The more we drive — the less we wal — the more health problems we have. So my 2 cents in: More sidewalks and bike lanes! I would encourage the men to all take responsibility. We have traded our power over government for being governed by bankers and politicians. The only stand anyone seems to take is special interest, rather than the interest of everyone.

Democracy has allowed majority groups power over individuals, and we need to hold liberty as our highest priority as our founding fathers did. Interesting comment, regardless of degree or positional power, are you ready to pay that price?

No, you and I alike should live up to our values alike. As someone who works in federal government, I know well that the only way to fix it is to work in or on it, and I invite others who have nothing but complaints to roll up their sleeves as well. I think the huge realization we need to make here in the US is that we must change our business model from expansion to sustainability. I think education is our biggest priority.

Not just for children, but for illiterate and undereducated adults, possibly classes in Life Skills-the practicalities of life. Educate people that without a viable middle class, there WILL BE a feudal type of society — a plutocracy — just what we are seeing now. I would fix American by instilling greater compassion and empathy in our children.

Hopefully those children will grow into adults who will demand a government that meets the basic needs of its people health care, jobs, education and does not cater to the whims of powerful corporations and wealthy individuals. I believe we will have to wait for future generations to carry out this mission since we who are currently adult citizens seem powerless or, worse, unwilling to do so. I say make service obligatory to citizenship. And leaders are chosen by a study of their achievements and merits, and if chosen to office have it be mandatory.

Those that wish to be in politics should definitely be excluded. Political office as punishment for preemminence of personhood. Finally, end earmarks and balanced budgets mandatory. Oh and also control the wide open borders. End all affirmative action and other separatist paradigmns. Wipe clean the tax laws and start from scratch.

Tax breaks should be created for businesses that manufacture renewable energy components domestically. To be effective, they should be in place for years, followed by a gradual phase-out, over several years.

I would educate parents on how to raise children with integrity so that they have the best opportunity to be a happy and productive citizen of the world. I would fix America by fixing our education system. Where is science and art in grammar school? It went with the budget-cuts. Legal bribes lobbying should cease immediately.

Raising money for Congressional re-elections has to cease being a hour job. Governments must govern, not obstruct. America could be so much better. If I could do one thing to fix America, I would change our constitution so that only individual people could contribute to the campaigns of elected officials, that they could only contribute small amounts, and that they could only contribute to candidates for whom they are eligible to vote. Until we get control of Congress back from big money, nothing else is going to get fixed.

The first step we should take is to stop blaming the govt. Americans made their own decisions to go into debt, spend wildly, and put their own financial future at risk by purchasing homes, cars, and other things. Seconly, we need to recalibrate. We need to cut defense spending and space exploration and put those dollars back into infrastructure, education, and technology.

This will spur jobs. Finally, we need to find a way to bring back compassion and civility. I feel like I alone know what the solution to our economic problems are although Donald Trump touched on it recently on a TV show. He said we ought to tax China heavily or put tariffs on imported goods from China.

This will not be a complete solution. Our problem is that American corporations and banks have sold our country out: We need to severely restrict the production of goods overseas for sale in the US!!

Our problem is we have no competent central control of our economy; rather, we have this doctrinaire blind faith in the haphazard free market system which is also responsible for the wild cyclic swings of bubbles and busts.

Clearly brokers and investment bankers love and promote this system. They need not trade in the market themselves since market euphoria and later panics generate lots of transactions and commissions which they thrive on.

This Adam Smith notion that everyone benefits society by pursuing their own self interests is nonsense. What I said above will require government action which the republicans loath because American businesses created this situation and therefore certainly they are not going to reverse it; they have every interest in continuing it.

Then we will see that at best nothing will improve. In fact, things will most likely get worse. I felt he would not address the fundamental problem and all the democrats have been doing is mask the problems by putting bandaids on them. I thought those on your show gave good suggestions though. I especially liked the one that said all campaigns should be prohibited from being financed by special interests. I say the free market system, as expected, has reached the end of the road and our economy will languish for many, many years because people will not accept that our path is flawed.

I have little hope for the USA. We eventually will have a revolution or a civil war. And, we all know from high school many people will not do well in college. We have had a false economy since the tech bubble which in about the time it burst Greenspan replaced it by a housing bubble by dropping interest rates. What Obama, Bernanke, and later the republicans will do is just perpetuate the illusion which is in reality an economic failure.

The corporate elite serving their own self interests took away millions of jobs from Americans and put them on the street. And to think I once envisioned the day when the employee would be asked for their input into how their job was done and even on some of the design of the product. I thought some of the drudgery of these jobs would be alleviated in this way. So now we also have astounding trade deficits as a consequence! Many people have enumerated how they would incite change, but we need to address the reasons behind the changes as well.

Not only is this a good monetary policy in general, but it is good on moral grounds as well. Disproportionate distribution of wealth is naturally divisive, as Aristotle and many other political philosophers have stated through-out history. Therefore it is socially advantages to limit distribution of wealth to more moderate fluctuations.

A progressive tax does this rather well, as the more you earn, the more you pay out in taxes, respectively. MRK-As technology continues to progress the only logical path is for the government to become more and more transparent. I believe this invariably leads to increased criticism.

You need a thick skin to work in the public eye. If you are in public service for public gratification and satisfaction you are in the wrong place. If you are in it because you believe in your work and you are getting the satisfaction you need, then you are the right person for the job and I wish we had more like you. Resources are being gobbled up at an ever-expanding rate! Is the subject taboo to all the news agencies of the world?

As predicted by many writers of that era, the problem is compounded by the poor out-breeding those that produce the excess that feeds them. That we have allowed millions more poor, unchecked breeders into the country is beyond belief.

China has already initiated measures to keep their resources at home. I love the intelligence shown by their government, is it because they only answer to to their future generations? They CARE about what their children will have to deal with and act accordingly. The US will soon be overtaken by China as the leader of the world for the simple reason that their government deals in reality and thinks further ahead than the next election.

As proof of the validity of my assertion that the US is doomed to fall, I offer one piece of evidence: My plan to fix America is simply: Too many times those countless Americans who have workable ideas to do great things find that they must first get permission from government. Even those good ideas that have some beneficial impact on our society have to first wait months or years before being allowed to move forward.

In the meantime, all Americans wait for good solutions that do not come. This has got to be reversed. Government must realize that it is up to the American People to decide, to act, to do, and to solve.

If you restore Liberty, then the nine people shown in the video above can immediately begin to implement their plans. With the current mindset we have, too much precious time will be spent by those nine trying to first convince government that their ways are worthwhile. How long will this take? How many generations must wait for government forces to shift momentum in the direction that these voices are advocating? If government steps down from its decision-making post and the mass of American individuals step up into that spot—AKA: But as long as we Americans think that we must wait for government to come up with solutions before any action can be taken, we will find ourselves waiting too long.

By restoring Liberty, those many good things that millions of people DO can be seen and copied by others who also want and need solutions, while those bad things that some people try can be identified as futile and discarded by millions without hesitation.

So my message to Government is: I am a good man who can do good things. There are millions of others like me. Stop trying to convince me with all of your new rules and regulations that I need permission from you to do these things.

Give me restored freedom so I can be free to do my part to fix America. And one last thing, government: If I and millions of others who do great things do find ourselves needing your help, we will tell you what to do. What concerns me more than economic disaster is the people who are letting it happen: The fact of the matter is that we are not being well represented, and that fact reflects poorly on two things: The vote is, in essence, a peaceful revolutionary mechanism.

Every election is a chance for us to put a new regime into power, literally. The unfortunate truth is that Americans today are not well educated in matters of government, which is why we are engaged in wars across the globe, our economy is on the verge of collapse, and our lives are being destroyed by the very people we put into power to better them.

Beyond civic literacy there is also a need for drastic political reform. As I said before, our government does not function in our best interest as it should. Voting today is little more than a popularity contest, and the candidates we chose are often not up to the Herculean task of governing or representing.

So, that being said, the first part of my second fix is readdressing the requirements to hold a position as important and enabling as a senior political officer. Second, if you allowed leaders to own property, there comes the temptation to use their influence to better their own standings… as is often the case in contemporary politics.

So, with that being said, I would likely implement a similar rule. Any political officer would be obligated to relinquish any and all assets to the state.

Such is the cost of leading, which is a great honor and privilege that needs no monetary compensation or temptation. The second part of my fix is means testing. Means testing is a test designed to test eligibility, in this case of both voters and candidates. Today, medical and bar tests that doctors and lawyers must pass in order to practice their trade could be considered means tests. That being said, voters and political officers would be similarly tested: You, the voter, are the doctor, and the legislation you pass and the people you bring to power are the tools and the treatments used on the system.

Would you rather have a professional doctor, with years of rigorous training and innumerable hours of practice do brain surgery on you? Or would you rather have average Joe do it?

These, although rather drastic and extreme by most peoples standards, are a few very viable solutions to a very specific problem. Do bear in mind that I am addressing the human portion of the equation, and only a very small portion of it. Nevertheless, these are important points to ponder…. As far as corrective mechanisms for our current monetary woes, there was a rather nice submission by John-C towards the top that can give you a good idea of what can be done there. That might not seem like a real solution, but I think that because our problems are not simple or singular, it would be a start.

The idea of this segment was to start a conversation about possibilities, but I noticed that all the contributors were early thirties and older. What about the young people? We, the twenty-somethings, are effected by the decisions made by our government and other controlling entities, but we are underrepresented.

Sure, we have the right to vote, but outside of that does anybody really care what we have to say? I started working at sixteen, started paying taxes at sixteen, but does anyone really want to know what I think our tax money should be spent on?

Not as far as I can tell. What do we know anyway? On top of that, even when we do offer suggestions, they are not properly considered. We may not have the answers, but as far as I can tell nobody else does either.

But I do know that no matter what the American people decide to do, it will take time. In fact, much more time than people like or want to admit. We, the people, cannot come up with real, viable solutions for the future without considering what the youth of today wants and needs for their future. And we cannot possibly know what that is unless somebody asks, and does so with the intent to actually listen to and consider the answers. Every Empire, Colonial Power, has failed for the same reasons.

Have your faith and laws by all means but respect thier faith and Sharia laws. Education has always been the key, but our education system is failing our children. It is the strange thinking that every child will benefit from this one-size fits all education. It is this thinking that every child will and should go on to college. It is this thinking that anything less than being a lawyer, doctor, politician, engineer, or teacher is somehow less than significant. Educators make kids feel that unless they have aspirations of going on to college, they will be nothing.

The manufacturing sector is gone, there are only so many service jobs and only so many jobs requiring a higher education. What is to become of all these people with degrees that mean nothing? It is all absurd, really. And the biggest thing is that not everyone wants to go on to college. There are plenty of people who will probably not cut it in college.

We all contribute to the function of this country. Fix this and I think we could actually begin to see a light at the end of the tunnel.

Must Americans are unrepentantly uneducated, ill informed and unmotivated. Joseph de Maistre wrote in And most of everything else that de Maistre has to say seems like utter rubbish to me. But, I believe this basic statement is true: We have the government which we collectively deserve. If we want to change things, we as a people have to start participating positively in our improvement instead of just standing around throwing tomatoes at whomever is currently in power.

Allow Gay marriages, it is a religious right as much as a constitutional right. Offer jobs to the unemployed to repair and rebuild our collapsing infrastructure. Maybe bring back the CCC Civilian Conservation Corps , they did a wonderful job building our infrastructure, why not let them repair it.

It was bigotry and racial injustice that made it illegal, and now organized crime is running rampant like with prohibition. If it is regulated and taxed the prospective revenue is in the billions for each state.

you could also

This story and others on PBS are just a small example. I don't either because it never happened. MSNBC collected data on journalists who made donations from the through the start of the campaigns, gave to democrats or liberal causes while only 16 gave to republicans.

When asked "generally speaking do you consider yourself a democrat, republican, independent, or something else? Foxnews does lean to the right. The only reason why they look so far right though is because everyone else leans left.

No one would care if Foxnews leaned to the right except they are doing very well in the ratings. See how I'm willing to admit Foxnews leans to the right? Will anyone else here admit most of the media leans to the left? Who's the naive one? Jesse Norman September 13, 6: What I would like to know is A new administration would at least give us hope for peace, if, and maybe if, we can show them by example.

Carol Huss September 12, Jesse Norman September 11, Looks like they posted my comment afterall, only a day after I sent it. I'm sure some postings don't get through for whatever reasons but if you look at the other threads and it's at least against Bush or the war. I've also seen the wackiest contributions on here as well. A lot of anti-Israeli sentiment, too. Yeah, blame the only civilized country in the region for protecting it's sliver of land against the continent scale lands of arabia.

Didn't know you were dyxlexic. In my first post I did ask if you meant WWII and really didn't know what you meant about "freighting". I assumed "frightening" but didn't know.

I am sure your posts not getting uploaded is due to user error, the same has happened to my post and I never took it personally, as I have reposted from a word document and they uploaded just fine. Thank you for pointing out my typos, and obvious problem with dyslexia.

I really appreciate that, so kind of you. I listened to him with my own two ears. He clearly connected the two and NO one would have made that connection with out the Bush propaganda.

But I am sure you hung on his every word and were able to catch his every speech. Show me the evidence that Saddam and Al Qaeda were connected, because the opinions and reports I have listened to say differently. The nonpartisan analysis that seems most reasonable points out that Saddam saw Bin Lauden as a threat to his power, he was much too paranoid of a dictator to allow Al Qaeda to operate out of Iraq.

In my opinion this rings true. Saddam was focused on two things, the local power play to control the Persian Gulf between Iran, Saudi Arabia and himself and his insane tribal hatred for his own citizens. These two things are what prompted him to invade Kuwait, which prompted the first Gulf War. He wanted Kuwait because the other two major players control so much more coastline and this inhibits his ability to compete in shipping his oil.

Saddam was an insane, ruthless and evil character with no redeeming qualities. I am sure he is burning in hell. But, it is quite likely he never really had plans to attack the US, his neighbors for sure, but the US … his world was much, much too small. Oh and by the way, I never supported, liked or voted for Bill Clinton. In my opinion he is just another sleazy Politician who cannot control his behavior.

I have always agreed that he inherited the good economy rather than create it. Passing the looming crises on to Bush. This is why I defended Bush in the beginning. But, I also do not think that anyone, including the terrorist could have anticipated what actually happened — the two buildings collapsing. So blaming in hindsight is really not a productive thing to do. I still believe that if we give up our most basic freedoms we have let the terrorist win.

And I still believe this is what is happening. This administration response is DEAD wrong as far as I am concerned and rather that winning the war on terror we are just fanning the flames, giving justification to their hatred and feeding our own irrational fear.

I am really honest when I say I would rather die in another terrorist attack than to give up my basic liberty under the Constitution and live in a country that is not free. MLM September 9, 9: I guess I'll have to repeat what I tried to send earlier but wasn't posted.

I think it was my nicest post too. Weird that I have read some postings calling Bush a murderer made it with no problem. No bias at all though. It never happened, so what the poll shows is people will believe anything and certainly will believe what they want to believe. I can read postings here and say it's definitely not a one-sided flaw. What the Bush administration however said was there was a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda, which there was. It is evident from the documents we've recovered as well as the knowledge that Al Zarqawi was treated in Baghdad before the war.

As far as comparing war speeches go, you can do that with anyone. You have to be smarter than that. What are speeches that rally people to war supposed to sound like? It doesn't even have to be about war. I bet if I had to I can find similar statements from Reagan and Ghandi.

Were Ghandi and Reagan alike? What does 'freighting' mean? You lost me there. Hitler wasn't around in WWI either.

I do strongly agree that the administration was very adamant about admitting mistakes, which made things worse. Rumsfeld was horrible and I celebrated the day he finally resigned. If I had more money I might have even invited all of you. Okay, I wouldn't have. I've never done drugs and I don't want to get a contact high. I guess also Jay P.

Jesse Norman September 9, 2: In an effort to rally support for a war, any speech will have similarities. That's just common sense. If I had to I could point out things how Reagansaid things that sounded like Ghandi. See, one can do that without comparing speeches on war, so that means nothing. Were Reagan and Ghandi two peas in a pod?

Did you mean WWII? Because Hitler wasn't anything in WWI. As far as the poll goes people will believe what they want to believe. What you accuse the administration of doing is simply not true. They did say there was a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda which was true. The more time went by the more documents were found linking them together.

Al Zarqawi was in Iraq before the war and received treatment on a wounded leg in Baghdad. There are other things linking Saddam with Al Qaeda which you can find on the net. If anything the administration didn't differentiate one terrorist or terrorist organization from the other, which it shouldn't do. There are many with the same objective and there's no amount of appeasement that will make them change their minds.

While I agree we should have concentrated more on getting Bin Laden, the status quo of the Iraqi situation was unacceptable. The UN loved Saddam despite his crimes because they got money and cheap oil.

Who are the real criminals? Who really should be impeached? Why does the UN even exist when it runs away from its own charter time and time again? My question for all of you is do you believe we should go into Darfur even if and when the UN says 'no, we won't do anything'?

Jesse Norman September 8, 2: Several people have objected to the comparison of this Administration and Hitler. I agree that this is a strong statement and of course has a strong element of hyperbole. I in no way wish to say that the leadership in Washington even comes close to that level of insanity and evil. Still there are, I believe some freighting similarities, in the tactics and inflammatory rhetoric that have and continue to come from this Administration.

The use of fear for persuasion, the demonizing of opponents, the unwillingness to admit mistakes, the refusal to change the tone of this rhetoric even after it was made clear that the basis for entry was false…is what concerns me most.

Neither of which has been proven true. This belief was fostered by this Administration. This is clearly, in my opinion, cause for alarm. I cannot say why this Administration was so intent on attacking a country that, no matter how evil and corrupt it was, did nothing to provoke our attack.

And posed no immediate danger to the US. I am reading a book about WWI at the moment. In it are several quotes form Hitler, to me there are obvious similarities to the tactics used by this Administration to sell this War.

The vector will not be asked afterwards whether he told the truth or not. When starting and waging war, it is not right that matters by victory. MLM September 8, Jesse Norman September 7, Sorry, to intrude Jay P but, you might be over simplifying the situation. I'm glad the military study came out in the news today that we need to take "lighter steps" in Iraq and move closer to ending the war without occupation and it's a relief to hear from hearts that may be in the right place.

How the President responds seems to be the difference between him being able to then keep his job to the end of this term or not. It'll be interesting how it plays out. It also seems that the executive branch is watering down the responsibilities of the legislative and judicial branches as well Carol Huss September 6, 6: Jesse Norman Thanks for your comments. Let me ask you this, if this war was started so Bush and Co.

Jay P September 6, 4: Jay P, where is your evidence of this? You know what evidence is, right? I can make up stuff all I want too but just because I can come up with it in my mind, it doesn't make it fact. Please tell us if you were a fly on the wall when all of this was supposedly discussed.

I'd be interested in reading it. I'm tired of all this "American imperialism" talk. Name a country we have really taken over and kept. I don't recall ever hearing the saying "the sun never sets on america".

If we went into Iraq because of oil, then how come oil is so high-priced throughout the world, not just in our country. Why do I have a big chip on my shoulder because of Clinton? Because he was very corrupt and I'm sure hardly any of you actually accept that he was.

The only thing he really got credit for was a good economy and that was falsely accredited. He was just president at the right time with the internet boom. Just as he was leaving we had the internet bust. Al Gore should have gotten the credit for the economy since he invented the internet. Carol, you make a very good point. One side pits against the other almost like in a play. There's the good side and the bad side.

Each side sees the other as the bad side, although I never heard Clinton compared to Hitler on the right like Bush has been nearly on a daily basis. It's almost like it's a setup. While most of America is in the middle, both parties play to their bases and nothing gets done. They worry more about playing "gotcha" than solving our nation's problems.

My points have been consistent that selective anger does nothing because both sides have it. When a president is elected, he will have selective outrage pitted against him. That's the state of our country right now. If we left Iraq right now, what happened in Vietnam after we left would pale in comparison. You can argue whether or not we should have gone in and if we screwed up or not. Saying Bush lied though is delusional considering every democrat who said Saddam had WMD's along with every country in the world, Clinton, and Hans Blix must have been in on the lie.

We all know that's not true I hope. Jesse Norman September 6, 1: It's obviously too easy to point fingers and take sides. Does truth in democracy and freedom require that we choose either Democrats or Republicans? I'm glad the discussion goes on. As far as what the majority thinks or does about impeachment now or what was previously done remains to be seen. Fighting a war is part of a process.

There are battles won and lost, a journey. Is it our place to make Iraq a US occupation? The need for it remains to be seen. It's only then that will we find our destiny whether to end the war or not. We have not found the necessary leadership with the UN? Discussion and Debate has it's purpose yet, let's not expect the required action to be proficiently done with too much delay. Carol Huss September 5, 6: Jesse Norman You seem to have a big chip on your shoulder concerning Clinton.

Why don't you focus on the present? Jay P September 5, 4: Charles, who are the people? It seems like most of you think that the majority of the country wants impeachment. Maybe the majority of people YOU all know, but not the majority in the country. Selective outrage over corruption gets nowhere because it's just that, selective. Clinton was the most corrupt of any President ever.

Much more corrupt than Bush supposedly is. Clinton did so many things that people don't even remember the majority of them because the sheer number is too voluminous to take in.

Clinton was said to have "a scandal a day". That was said by Jerry Brown who ran against him in for the democratic ticket. It wasn't just about his affairs either. Why don't you all get mad at politicians on both sides who are corrupt?

I reckon none of you. I contacted my representatives over this. I also contacted my representatives over the Tom Delay situation. How much outrage was there among you when Gerry Studds had sex with an underage male page and then when re-elected received a standing ovation by the democratic caucus? William Jefferson also received a standing ovation by the black congressional caucus. Where was the outrage? Democrats will say "well the people of Louisiana re-elected him.

Let the process work itself out and see if he is convicted. Then he will be removed". Selective outrage means absolutely nothing because both sides have it. Jesse Norman September 5, 3: Based on all the most recent Presidential approval polls, most citizens would disagree with Rep. Miller and the Democratic leadership.

Now, of course, they claim they were ignorant of the facts leading to the invasion of Iraq. I wonder if they even bothered reading any of the many books and articles suggesting that the invasion of Iraq would be a horrendous mistake and that there was no justification for it. The Democrats have failed to bring an end to an illegal war, which they promised they would do.

They failed to restore our constitutional rights and they failed to bring the perpetrators of war crimes to justice. Rather than address these pressing issues, the Democrats focus solely on who will run for president in When we listen closely to what the candidates are saying we realize they have no plan to end the war. Our sons and daughters are dying and being seriously wounded on a daily basis in what Rep. Miller admits is an unjustified war. Members of the legal profession and constitutional scholars have prepared the case.

All the Democrats need to do is start the proceedings. Republicans will see which way the wind blows once the evidence is presented and they will be forced to act responsibly or lose future elections. So what are the Democrats afraid of? They are afraid that if Bush and Cheney were removed from office, Nancy Pelosi would become president and have to deal with the real issue: Instead, they would prefer to allow the war to continue, blame the Republicans for the quagmire in Iraq and walk into power in In the meantime, the criminals are free to continue living the good life, while our soldiers continue to die and become disabled.

Smith September 1, 3: That is my point, Jesse, there is no place for complacency whether middle ground or not. Thank you for your integrity. I just see a lot of corruption in today's world and without firm, decisive actions in leadership or elsewhere like, at least, careful consideration of impeachment and possible removal from office of the President and others we are doomed to fail.

We can do it by being diplomatic I do not have the gift of gab for a lot detail but, with intent as a generalist I can readily focus on the big picture. Carol Huss August 28, You do not seriously think Clinton only lied about sex in the oval office do you? If Bill Clinton told you the sky was blue, I know you'd look up just to make sure, just as I would.

I laid out many things Clinton did and could have listed many more, and they're undeniable. I won't get into Whitewater even though something wasn't right there, to me it's not an issue.

You don't think Clinton had Janet Reno stop those investigations that looked into his dealings on different fronts? Aren't those impeachable offenses? None of those I listed I would consider "Bush-friendly".

Jesse Norman August 28, 7: For those who want to do something about impeachment: Sign the petition at http: Over , have already signed. Dennis Kucinich has spoken out against the Bush administration's war on Iraq and now he is speaking out against war with Iran: There are more reasons than ever to impeach Cheney; many are afraid that he will do anything to pull us into a war with Iran.

And for those who are wondering where the protesters are: There are ongoing protests -- a good place to start is: Stephanie August 28, Bush lied to the American people and the world about the reasons for waging war against another country that was of no imediate threat to the US. Bush circumvented the 4th amendment and continues to put American citizens under surveillance with out warrant. I do not take impeachment lightly, impeaching Clinton In my opinion was politically motivated.

But, in this case I think we are talking about our core freedoms under the constitution. Impeachment was put in place by the founding Fathers as a last resort way for the people to correct the situation when the balance of power becomes so one sided that Democracy is threatened.

It is my opinion we are at such a point in History. For me it is not about party bickering. This is about keeping American Democracy and Freedom alive. I agree we don't want to make this a trend. But that risk is a much less than the current one where the executive branch has more power than is cnstitutionally given or intended.

I actually supported Bush in the begainning. Was impressed with hearing him speak in person before the first ellection. And, I was taken in by the lies about Iraq for a while. But it is now clear that there was and continues to be a hidden agenda, one that I do not support.

MLM August 27, First of all Jeff, I'm sorry for your health situation. I myself have chronic kidney failure, so I will be fortunate if I do see Why I have my health problems is because my father was exposed to Agent Orange while he served in Vietnam. Because of his exposure, I have IgA which caused later on proteinuria and hematuria, so I know what you must be going through with your health.

I understood your post just fine. If I worked for the republican party or Rove, I'd have to be a follower. To be totally upfront, I am a registered democrat. The reason why I keep bringing up Clinton's impeachment is because Clinton actually did impeachable things, but there was not a program called "Let's Get The Conversation Rolling About Impeaching Clinton" on any network.

I'm all for letting go of the past, but my point was that this is very hypocritical. Many of the ones who were saying bad things rightfully so about those who wanted Clinton impeached are now talking about impeachng Bush. That's hypocrisy to the Nth degree. People do disagree with leaders of both parties on major issues and still keep their reputation as being honorable people who's not impersonating Joe Bloke while actually working for one of the major parties. Carol, as far as being in the middle being equal to complacency I fully disagree.

Although my health keeps me from doing all I want in making my voice heard on issues, I do contact my congressman and senators pretty regularly. My congressman is Visclosky, a democrat, and has done a good job. One of my senators, Bayh has done a great job.

If the democrats were smart, they'd really look into this guy. In order to impeach a president, they must do something REALLY bad in my opinion as is the opinion of most in the country. I don't believe what Bush has done warrants impeachment, and neither did Clinton.

It would harm this country greatly to remove a president, and would be the start of a horrible road where impeaching presidents would be an issue with EVERY president from then on. Do you want to go down that road? Jesse Norman August 25, 3: It actually gives me the "warm fuzzies" to read a blog that attracts so many educated participants.

Several nights ago, I had the pleasure of attending a lecture given by the lead attorney for Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the case that challenged the constitutionality of military trials at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Neal Katyal won that case and his remarkable lecture truly gave me hope. Katyal reminded us that Hamdan, a man with a fourth grade education who served as bin Laden's driver, was able to sue the two most powerful men in the world, Bush and Rumsfeld, and win.

While I am disheartened that the suit was won only after a man who should have had a presumption of innocence had served years in Gitmo, suffering isolation, a lack of representation, and what anyone subjected to it would call torture, he did win. After the lecture the host reminded us that the kind of freedoms we have taken for granted do not represent the systems under which most of the world lives now or ever has.

There have only a handful of times in history when free societies flourished. They have been few and infrequent and have never lasted more than a few hundred years. The general thinking of the American citizen is that things are cyclical and that this too shall pass. History does not support that view.

History reveals that the freedom we have is a fragile thing that will vanish if not vigorously defended. If we allow what has happened over the last few years to go without serious consequence, we will lose the America we cherish.

Impeachment is the only means by which we can declare that the actions of this administration are unacceptable and will not be allowed now or in the future. We failed to make this distinction when we accepted the pardon of Richard Nixon. That was a mistake for which we are now paying. Compared to Watergate, the crimes of this administration, violation of the constitution they were sworn to uphold, violation of U.

Many of you will undoubtedly think to yourselves "I can't believe she said that in a public venue! That said, I believe the future of our nation is at stake. I hope everyone reading this will speak out, write the papers, call your elected representatives and remind them of the oath of office they swore.

That cannot happen with Alberto Gonzales in the office of the Attorney General operating under the mistaken belief that it is his job to protect and defend the incompetence and arrogance of the man who sits in the office of the presidency.

I know I am preaching to the choir and for that I apologize. But more and more frequently I voice my opinion and someone tells me that they thought they were the only one who saw what was happening. We must be visible, we must show others that it IS acceptable to tell the truth and defend this nation. Gail Frank August 25, 2: We elected a Democratic congress in and yet the "lame duck" President continues to flaunt the Constitution and act more like a monarch than a public servant.

Too many are in the thrall of the special interests. Impeachment seems like a taboo subject--but I think everyone's just afraid. Two things are different from the turbulent s when the people stood up and made the President and the Congress listen: Complacency will destroy Democracy and, ultimately, America.

Scott Berry August 24, In the words of George Orwell: Please continue being revolutionary. For the sake of keeping our Constitution as it was intended and not allowing it to be subverted, both Cheney and Bush should be impaeached.

Rose August 24, For the sake of keeping our Constitution as it was intnded and not allowing it to be subverted, both Cheney and Bush should be impaeached. Thanks Jeff for trying. I wouldn't acknowledge the personal attacks. The point is promoting and tooling an intelligent, diverse discussion as indicated in Bill Moyers Blog rules.

You needn't defend yourself that way. Carol Huss August 24, 5: Our society is "side" oriented which I feel divides us and that events are intentionally created to keep manifesting this mentality. I feel ALL people, no matter what race, nationality, or religious beliefs need to recognize this and come together as one-if we all wish to continue as a species.

The world has gotten too small to continue the way we have been-we need to stop thinking borders and nationalities and remove greed and personal ego from our thoughts if we wish to live in peace with each other. I probably won't be alive when you reach I am doing what I can to make up for what I did not do earlier in my life politically and environmentally because when I die, I want my soul to be able to look back and say to itself- I tried, I at least tried.

I still feel sorry for you-you can personally attack me all you want-If that makes you feel better. I watched the Ken Burns Cival War series and what I was most impressed with was the the integrity, honor, and passion people had in our Country during that time period which is so lacking in todays society.

You seem to have that - don't loose it-share it and spead it just stop being so self absorbed and stop attacking others-it devides us "Peace In" Jeff. Jeff Findeis August 24, 2: To comfort myself I came to Bill Moyers Journal as it rescues me from despair every week by meeting decent people. Carol Huss August 24, Yet, complatency is not appropriate in the middle ground either.

Impeachment has a purpose and whether a President is permitted to finish the term, I believe, depends heavily on his actions. Let the Constitution work. You do have a neanderthal iq from what I could read. Is it possible that maybe, just maybe I can disagree with you without being a republican follower of Karl Rove?

What you wrote is downright silly and further explains people who are on your side of these issues. I clearly stated that I was against impeachment with Clinton, but can't take my word for it because it describes me as somewhat in the middle. It doesn't make sense to you that someone would be ok with Clinton finishing his term as well as Bush.

Loved the conspiracy theory you pushed there too. I know people on the left can't resist a good conspiracy. I'm sure some read what you wrote and said "yeah maaan, that makes sense". There was a large percentage who wanted Clinton impeached, but it wasn't most.

I think "most" is key here. I am quite sure you are not in the majority on this issue. What's my point with Clinton? I'm sure you didn't raise up a fuss when Clinton did terrible thing after terrible thing is what my point was.

Raising or repealing contribution limits. Opposing the identification of donors. Ending restrictions on political parties.

Federal Election Commission overturned parts of that law, so the current platform now calls for removing remaining restrictions on political parties — something GOP delegate Jim Bopp of Indiana , a prominent campaign finance lawyer, is trying to do via the courts. Listen here to the interview , and begin the clip at the Nearly a year ago today, Donald Trump found himself weathering withering attacks from Texas Gov. Rick Perry , then himself a Republican presidential candidate — albeit one struggling to attract financial or moral support.

Perry would soon become the first Republican presidential candidate to quit Election Flash forward to Monday night. Read the full story about his fundraising at the convention here. First, John Pudner of Take Back Our Republic and Morris Pearl of Patriotic Millionaires stood suited up atop a shade-free platform in a park on a day when temperatures topped 90 degrees.

The assembled crowd numbered 15 people, perhaps Then, the wind blew down the little sign Pudner and Pearl had placed by their stage to promote their talk. It might all seem to be a metaphor for right-of-center activists bent on convincing their ideological brethren that the post- Citizens United age of big-money politics is toxic. Campaign finance reform is most often the providence of liberals and Democrats.

Congressional Republicans, in particular, have routinely rejected legislation designed to curtail political money or otherwise limit its influence on elections. And he challenged political candidates and special interests alike to break free of what he considers a most unhealthy relationship.

He proposed several reforms he says both liberals and conservatives could agree upon. Most importantly, Pudner said, Americans must press their own congressional representatives and local leaders to push for systematic campaign money reforms. Among CLE host committee's known donors?

There is plenty of political pageantry going down inside Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, where the Republican National Convention is taking place. But step outside, and you'll find a world of glad-handing and deal-making that might even make a convention delegate blush.

Listen to their conversation here , and start the clip at the minute mark. Among the convention partygoers this week in Cleveland will be a quorum of the nation's top election regulators. Republican National Convention organizers do a dry run of the day's programming. The RNC host committee in Cleveland is still scrambling to raise those last few millions of dollars, but the DNC host committee is hitting a few bumps, too.

In an interview with the Inquirer , David L. Cohen, a Comcast executive and special adviser to the host committee, said it will appeal and is pursuing workarounds in the meantime. At least two donors requested money back because of the uncertainty around the deduction, he said. Cohen told the Inquirer that the host committee has an agreement with the Convention and Visitors Bureau Foundation, which does have the charitable tax status.

Individual donors who need the tax deduction would donate to that foundation, which would then give a grant to the host committee. Corporations would be permitted to deduct contributions necessary to their business under that status, per the tax code.

He also previews the people scheduled to speak at the convention Monday. Capri Cafaro , the answer is "very. The Center for Public Integrity recently caught up with Cafaro, who represents an area of northeastern Ohio, to discuss why Trump is winning over many Ohioans. Read the full interview here. First, funnel a gaggle of candidates, political operatives, assorted VIPs, corporate types and Republican National Convention delegates into a very well-secured playground of free food and booze.

Board of Education , which desegregated public schools. Senate candidate Elizabeth Emken of California; current U. Playing the role of Suzy Sunshine: As Republicans here in Cleveland ready for Cirque du Donald, Democrats are doing their best to plumb their base for anti-Trump, post-Bernie Sanders vacuum pennies. Take this come-on from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which proclaims: Your support got us here, Friend.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, meanwhile, laments: Donald Trump won't be happy: But if it begins pouring here in Cleveland, Trump's favorite Asian foil will be on attendees' minds: Trump himself has caught flak for lending his name to a clothing line that includes suits and ties made in China. Come Monday — the first day of the Republican National Convention — a gaggle of Republican lawmakers, corporate interests and a prominent Fox News host are scheduled to tee off at a posh Cleveland-area golf course in the name of helping educate children of injured and deceased members of the armed services.

Print lots of money! Of course, no one will loan us any more money, which is good because our government will be forced to live within its means. It will be forced to spend only what it receives in taxes. Imports will be very expensive which will force us all to buy local products.

This will make our exports very competitive. SE Asian and Haitian workers crank out widgets for pennies an hour. This policy would be the road to years of subservience to China. How to fix America? What good are a bunch of ideas unless they are developed, organized and used to form some sort of structure that empowers people. Good Ideas lead to path-breaking new industries like the ones that were created in the s bt Steve Jobs and Buill Gates.

I wish I had your faith in the majority. Look at the election and how many people voted against their own self interests. The best real-life example of a country that squandered its opportunities, that just printed money to produce widgets is Argentina after the first world war.

But then Argentina refused to invest a dime in national brainpower or infrastructure, and is still relegated to its fourth-class status as a commodities and local widgets producer…. Well, hopefully someone influential, wealthy, and very powerful, somewhere in our vast country will read some of these posts and use some of them positively……The authors of this website appear to be genuinely interested in improving America.

You never know who will see these ideas! Forcing everyone to have insurance will just cause more of the same problems that we are all familiar with.

I for one would like to see medical cost come down. Why not pass a law that prevents anyone from having insurance. Costs and the structure of the medical establishment would change overnight. I think you would quickly begin to see competitive subscription based medicine and we would all benefit if we could suffer the transition.

Interestingly enough no one talked about the military, yet the 2 most costly and least effective government funded operations of the decade have been the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is widely accepted that both wars are over Oil Iraq and Minerals estimated 1 trillion in Afghanistan , rather than the stabilization of the world.

There are so many atrocities committed by us because of our military attachment to the colonial industrialization of the third world. We need to shutdown and remove all foreign military operations. All foreign bases, all american troops returned back to their own soil.

Maybe then we can truly our example of freedom being a good thing, and maybe then we can fix these domestic problems-i. Without a single exception, all of the selected experts opined without hesitation a remedy for which they neither acknowledged nor explained the source of the malady for which their specific brand of remedy was a sure fired cure.

And yet, with all of their collective knowledge and expertise, not one of them paid any attention to, let alone explained how, or to what extent the Constitution relates to the very issues they rise to address. It never ceases to amaze me how thoughtless the majority of people in this country have become. Their memories are short-lived, and their ability to remain focused on the principles upon which this nation was founded is virtually non-existent.

The real malady America faces is the failure of its people to believe that the true source of their strength, protection, and prosperity resides in the very document that binds us all to each other. The only reason my speech is protected is because your speech is protected. The logic of these fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution is unassailable.

The moment we deny anyone the same rights and protections we all believe in, that is the moment we all become slaves to oppression. You want to fix America? Then start believing in, and adhering to the very same ideas and principles the Founding Fathers created and intended to pass on to each and every succeeding generation of Americans. What we could all use more of is appreciation for what we get from the taxes we pay and empathy for those folks who step up to represent us.

The I-Phone comment sounds glib. Maybe we could use less misinformation from both the government and the media and stop looking at these problems as being too complicated or too deeply rooted to be changed.

If that is your feeling, and you do work in government, then maybe it is time for you to look for work in the private sector, because the critics are only going to get worse. The best way to fix America is to create an enviorment in which the middle class can flourish. If we returned to any of federal income tax rates between and we could put an end to the deficit, balance out Social Security and create a more stable political enviorment for the USA by creating a more robust middle class.

A second idea that goes hand in hand with a return to earlier tax rates is to return to credit card interest deductions on federal income tax. The people that do are mostly struggling middle class families. We need a commission to investigate and prosecute white collar crime. The lying cheating and stealing has to stop. The laws of the land are not being enforced or punished.

Put the offenders in jail. Sit back and watch the US flourish. Until then, more of the same. I would start by renewing the fairness doctrine. Since the loss of the Fairness Doctrine in , our nation has descended to near civil war.

We have corporations like Fox News who benefit from strife and that strife is killing us. We solve nothing but fight everything. As opposed to discussing the issues of Health Care Reform, we discussed death panels, and not the ones in the insurance companies. That is beneficial for everyone. Also, if tv has to give equal time, then corporations are not encouraged to buy up big blocks of our politicians because all ideas have to get out anyhow.

We need to adopt policies and attitudes that minimize harm to people and to the environment. Currently public policy attempts to harm people who possess and use marijuana.

Billions of dollars are spent on police and courts while billions more fund an uncontrolled underground economy which is currently killing tens of thousands of people, many near the US-Mexico boarder. With a simple change of attitude marijuana can be controlled similar to alcohol and cigarettes. Substantial tax income can be used to fund education and treatment programs to help minimize the social costs.

Some people would like to see everyone who receives public assistance be tested for drugs. The subtext is that we need to weed out the drug users. If we adopt harm reduction as our primary goal all drug use is considered a medical issue. No one gets incarcerated for using drugs. With a simple attitude change we separate the drugs from the guns.

Drugs are not the problem. People hurting themselves and others is the problem. People need help with their problems, not threats. The US spends way too much money on the military.

If our primary goal is harm reduction world wide then the use of force is the last option. Trillions of dollars can be saved world wide with much of it coming directly from US tax payers. For every dollar we spend on the military we need to spend a dollar on aid which directly helps people.

Real benefit to all people and the environment comes from simply endorsing harm reduction. If the American people were truly represented by our elected officials,most of these problems would be handled in a way we could all accept. The American political process is out-dated and ineffective.

It leaves the American people unrepresented and at the mercy of whoever has the most money to throw around. Since the challenge makes me omnipotent and I can now do things that are not actually possible, I would enact a constitutional amendment that is elegantly simple but would completely change how we govern ourselves and the effectiveness of that governance: That can not be allowed to continue if we really expect our republic to work.

A poor person has one voice. A rich person has one voice. A group of people have a voice for each member. Let their voices be heard and not just their dollars. Needed is a Mandatory program of national service with both civilian and military read draft options — choice left to the citizen. Civic action begins at home. But first, we need to stop killing people in foreign lands and bring ALL the troops home. How many foreign countries have military installations within the US?

This from a 70ish former anti-draft Army lifer. It is critical to get at root causes in any attempt to fix America. We are among the most unequal of all industrialized nations with regard to the ever-growing gap between rich and poor.

Such rampant inequality eventually destroys trust since inherent in such a scheme is the assumption that everyone is out to take advantage of everyone else. Substandard distribution of health care, our broken economic system, our relegation of ethical principles to the shadows and other quality of life indices can be traced to rewarding the greedy among us that is, rewarding inequality and distrust. Corporations dominate and rule without any other motive than short-term profit maximization, rendering any consideration of the higher values of human social life anathema to their ruthless modus operandi.

As long as this paradigm is encouraged to continue, there will be an exponential destruction of equality and trust in our society — not a winning strategy for U. What will our new future be? Suggestion to improve our country: Reinstate the military draft. That would increase employment.

It will take a large group of citizens to formulate a doctrine of principles and agree to only vote for those candidates that agree to follow those specific principles. In other words transparency and integrity. There is not even a decent shoulder when getting out of my neighborhood. It is not safe. The more we drive — the less we wal — the more health problems we have.

So my 2 cents in: More sidewalks and bike lanes! I would encourage the men to all take responsibility. We have traded our power over government for being governed by bankers and politicians. The only stand anyone seems to take is special interest, rather than the interest of everyone. Democracy has allowed majority groups power over individuals, and we need to hold liberty as our highest priority as our founding fathers did.

Interesting comment, regardless of degree or positional power, are you ready to pay that price? No, you and I alike should live up to our values alike. As someone who works in federal government, I know well that the only way to fix it is to work in or on it, and I invite others who have nothing but complaints to roll up their sleeves as well.

I think the huge realization we need to make here in the US is that we must change our business model from expansion to sustainability. I think education is our biggest priority. Not just for children, but for illiterate and undereducated adults, possibly classes in Life Skills-the practicalities of life. Educate people that without a viable middle class, there WILL BE a feudal type of society — a plutocracy — just what we are seeing now. I would fix American by instilling greater compassion and empathy in our children.

Hopefully those children will grow into adults who will demand a government that meets the basic needs of its people health care, jobs, education and does not cater to the whims of powerful corporations and wealthy individuals. I believe we will have to wait for future generations to carry out this mission since we who are currently adult citizens seem powerless or, worse, unwilling to do so.

I say make service obligatory to citizenship. And leaders are chosen by a study of their achievements and merits, and if chosen to office have it be mandatory. Those that wish to be in politics should definitely be excluded. Political office as punishment for preemminence of personhood. Finally, end earmarks and balanced budgets mandatory. Oh and also control the wide open borders. End all affirmative action and other separatist paradigmns.

Wipe clean the tax laws and start from scratch. Tax breaks should be created for businesses that manufacture renewable energy components domestically. To be effective, they should be in place for years, followed by a gradual phase-out, over several years.

I would educate parents on how to raise children with integrity so that they have the best opportunity to be a happy and productive citizen of the world. I would fix America by fixing our education system. Where is science and art in grammar school? It went with the budget-cuts. Legal bribes lobbying should cease immediately.

Raising money for Congressional re-elections has to cease being a hour job. Governments must govern, not obstruct. America could be so much better. If I could do one thing to fix America, I would change our constitution so that only individual people could contribute to the campaigns of elected officials, that they could only contribute small amounts, and that they could only contribute to candidates for whom they are eligible to vote. Until we get control of Congress back from big money, nothing else is going to get fixed.

The first step we should take is to stop blaming the govt. Americans made their own decisions to go into debt, spend wildly, and put their own financial future at risk by purchasing homes, cars, and other things. Seconly, we need to recalibrate. We need to cut defense spending and space exploration and put those dollars back into infrastructure, education, and technology.

This will spur jobs. Finally, we need to find a way to bring back compassion and civility. I feel like I alone know what the solution to our economic problems are although Donald Trump touched on it recently on a TV show.

He said we ought to tax China heavily or put tariffs on imported goods from China. This will not be a complete solution. Our problem is that American corporations and banks have sold our country out: We need to severely restrict the production of goods overseas for sale in the US!!

Our problem is we have no competent central control of our economy; rather, we have this doctrinaire blind faith in the haphazard free market system which is also responsible for the wild cyclic swings of bubbles and busts.

Clearly brokers and investment bankers love and promote this system. They need not trade in the market themselves since market euphoria and later panics generate lots of transactions and commissions which they thrive on. This Adam Smith notion that everyone benefits society by pursuing their own self interests is nonsense. What I said above will require government action which the republicans loath because American businesses created this situation and therefore certainly they are not going to reverse it; they have every interest in continuing it.

Then we will see that at best nothing will improve. In fact, things will most likely get worse. I felt he would not address the fundamental problem and all the democrats have been doing is mask the problems by putting bandaids on them. I thought those on your show gave good suggestions though. I especially liked the one that said all campaigns should be prohibited from being financed by special interests. I say the free market system, as expected, has reached the end of the road and our economy will languish for many, many years because people will not accept that our path is flawed.

I have little hope for the USA. We eventually will have a revolution or a civil war. And, we all know from high school many people will not do well in college.

We have had a false economy since the tech bubble which in about the time it burst Greenspan replaced it by a housing bubble by dropping interest rates. What Obama, Bernanke, and later the republicans will do is just perpetuate the illusion which is in reality an economic failure. The corporate elite serving their own self interests took away millions of jobs from Americans and put them on the street.

And to think I once envisioned the day when the employee would be asked for their input into how their job was done and even on some of the design of the product. I thought some of the drudgery of these jobs would be alleviated in this way. So now we also have astounding trade deficits as a consequence! Many people have enumerated how they would incite change, but we need to address the reasons behind the changes as well.

Not only is this a good monetary policy in general, but it is good on moral grounds as well. Disproportionate distribution of wealth is naturally divisive, as Aristotle and many other political philosophers have stated through-out history.

Therefore it is socially advantages to limit distribution of wealth to more moderate fluctuations. A progressive tax does this rather well, as the more you earn, the more you pay out in taxes, respectively. MRK-As technology continues to progress the only logical path is for the government to become more and more transparent. I believe this invariably leads to increased criticism. You need a thick skin to work in the public eye. If you are in public service for public gratification and satisfaction you are in the wrong place.

If you are in it because you believe in your work and you are getting the satisfaction you need, then you are the right person for the job and I wish we had more like you. Resources are being gobbled up at an ever-expanding rate! Is the subject taboo to all the news agencies of the world? As predicted by many writers of that era, the problem is compounded by the poor out-breeding those that produce the excess that feeds them.

That we have allowed millions more poor, unchecked breeders into the country is beyond belief. China has already initiated measures to keep their resources at home. I love the intelligence shown by their government, is it because they only answer to to their future generations?

They CARE about what their children will have to deal with and act accordingly. The US will soon be overtaken by China as the leader of the world for the simple reason that their government deals in reality and thinks further ahead than the next election. As proof of the validity of my assertion that the US is doomed to fall, I offer one piece of evidence: My plan to fix America is simply: Too many times those countless Americans who have workable ideas to do great things find that they must first get permission from government.

Even those good ideas that have some beneficial impact on our society have to first wait months or years before being allowed to move forward.

In the meantime, all Americans wait for good solutions that do not come. This has got to be reversed. Government must realize that it is up to the American People to decide, to act, to do, and to solve. If you restore Liberty, then the nine people shown in the video above can immediately begin to implement their plans. With the current mindset we have, too much precious time will be spent by those nine trying to first convince government that their ways are worthwhile.

How long will this take? How many generations must wait for government forces to shift momentum in the direction that these voices are advocating? If government steps down from its decision-making post and the mass of American individuals step up into that spot—AKA: But as long as we Americans think that we must wait for government to come up with solutions before any action can be taken, we will find ourselves waiting too long.

By restoring Liberty, those many good things that millions of people DO can be seen and copied by others who also want and need solutions, while those bad things that some people try can be identified as futile and discarded by millions without hesitation. So my message to Government is: I am a good man who can do good things.

There are millions of others like me. Stop trying to convince me with all of your new rules and regulations that I need permission from you to do these things.

Give me restored freedom so I can be free to do my part to fix America. And one last thing, government: If I and millions of others who do great things do find ourselves needing your help, we will tell you what to do. What concerns me more than economic disaster is the people who are letting it happen: The fact of the matter is that we are not being well represented, and that fact reflects poorly on two things: The vote is, in essence, a peaceful revolutionary mechanism.

Every election is a chance for us to put a new regime into power, literally. The unfortunate truth is that Americans today are not well educated in matters of government, which is why we are engaged in wars across the globe, our economy is on the verge of collapse, and our lives are being destroyed by the very people we put into power to better them. Beyond civic literacy there is also a need for drastic political reform.

As I said before, our government does not function in our best interest as it should. Voting today is little more than a popularity contest, and the candidates we chose are often not up to the Herculean task of governing or representing. So, that being said, the first part of my second fix is readdressing the requirements to hold a position as important and enabling as a senior political officer.

Second, if you allowed leaders to own property, there comes the temptation to use their influence to better their own standings… as is often the case in contemporary politics. So, with that being said, I would likely implement a similar rule. Any political officer would be obligated to relinquish any and all assets to the state. Such is the cost of leading, which is a great honor and privilege that needs no monetary compensation or temptation.

The second part of my fix is means testing. Means testing is a test designed to test eligibility, in this case of both voters and candidates. Today, medical and bar tests that doctors and lawyers must pass in order to practice their trade could be considered means tests. That being said, voters and political officers would be similarly tested: You, the voter, are the doctor, and the legislation you pass and the people you bring to power are the tools and the treatments used on the system.

Would you rather have a professional doctor, with years of rigorous training and innumerable hours of practice do brain surgery on you? Or would you rather have average Joe do it? These, although rather drastic and extreme by most peoples standards, are a few very viable solutions to a very specific problem. Do bear in mind that I am addressing the human portion of the equation, and only a very small portion of it. Nevertheless, these are important points to ponder….

As far as corrective mechanisms for our current monetary woes, there was a rather nice submission by John-C towards the top that can give you a good idea of what can be done there. That might not seem like a real solution, but I think that because our problems are not simple or singular, it would be a start. The idea of this segment was to start a conversation about possibilities, but I noticed that all the contributors were early thirties and older.

What about the young people? We, the twenty-somethings, are effected by the decisions made by our government and other controlling entities, but we are underrepresented. Sure, we have the right to vote, but outside of that does anybody really care what we have to say? I started working at sixteen, started paying taxes at sixteen, but does anyone really want to know what I think our tax money should be spent on?

Not as far as I can tell. What do we know anyway? On top of that, even when we do offer suggestions, they are not properly considered. We may not have the answers, but as far as I can tell nobody else does either. But I do know that no matter what the American people decide to do, it will take time.

In fact, much more time than people like or want to admit. We, the people, cannot come up with real, viable solutions for the future without considering what the youth of today wants and needs for their future. And we cannot possibly know what that is unless somebody asks, and does so with the intent to actually listen to and consider the answers. Every Empire, Colonial Power, has failed for the same reasons.

Have your faith and laws by all means but respect thier faith and Sharia laws. Education has always been the key, but our education system is failing our children. It is the strange thinking that every child will benefit from this one-size fits all education. It is this thinking that every child will and should go on to college.

It is this thinking that anything less than being a lawyer, doctor, politician, engineer, or teacher is somehow less than significant. Educators make kids feel that unless they have aspirations of going on to college, they will be nothing.

The manufacturing sector is gone, there are only so many service jobs and only so many jobs requiring a higher education. What is to become of all these people with degrees that mean nothing? It is all absurd, really. And the biggest thing is that not everyone wants to go on to college.

There are plenty of people who will probably not cut it in college. We all contribute to the function of this country. Fix this and I think we could actually begin to see a light at the end of the tunnel.

Must Americans are unrepentantly uneducated, ill informed and unmotivated. Joseph de Maistre wrote in And most of everything else that de Maistre has to say seems like utter rubbish to me. But, I believe this basic statement is true: We have the government which we collectively deserve.

If we want to change things, we as a people have to start participating positively in our improvement instead of just standing around throwing tomatoes at whomever is currently in power.

Allow Gay marriages, it is a religious right as much as a constitutional right. Offer jobs to the unemployed to repair and rebuild our collapsing infrastructure. Maybe bring back the CCC Civilian Conservation Corps , they did a wonderful job building our infrastructure, why not let them repair it. It was bigotry and racial injustice that made it illegal, and now organized crime is running rampant like with prohibition. If it is regulated and taxed the prospective revenue is in the billions for each state.

Update the Building codes. Make it mandatory to install solar shingles, attach small wind generators to houses. There has got to be a way to make a window generate power with all the light that goes through it. However, the preachers of morality are not always following the same rules and those rules are not always applied evenly.

Wallstreet helped to create a paperwork mess, that was profitable for a while, requested and received a government bailout and then denies extending bailouts to their customers while handing out raises. A woman extolling abstinence and success as a single mother at 15k a speaking engagement, while American single teen-age mothers are seeking welfare.

Ministers, actual preachers, are advising their congregation on faithful marriages and then cheating on their own spouses. And if someone mentions regulations, the answer is that any regulation would hurt the small business and the government should have no part.

I think that with both parents working in many families, it would be a good idea to extend the school day and year, BUT only if a LONG siesta was provided after lunch. The people in this country seem to be in such a rush to go nowhere. If only our citizens were responsible enough to check the facts on PolitiFact.

It should address common daily problems like how to handle a diminishing workload, why stealing is wrong even if it goes unnoticed, and how we can support each other to improve our lot. We need to learn how and why to help each other.

We need representation, not just leadership. Our lot should not be a compromise made between the middle class and the wealthy. Prioritize diagnosis and treatment of underlying causes over treatment of symptoms. Detect and treat diseases early; prevent them whenever possible. Prioritize mental and physical health first, Viagra and boob jobs later. Like water and air, declare health care a human right that should be available to all. There are many problems in this country and it seems as if now we are in a critical decade where the choices made now will effect the nation, this world and humankind.

Churches are a cancer and a huge source of tax revenue. Next, get serious about electric cars and real alternative energy; natural gas is not clean, we are being lied to.

We need to break down the military industrial complex- stop waging corporate wars, and end the drug war. There is no hope for any of these happening, really, and I admit that. We are run by a two party corporate oligopoly and money talks and ruins us all.

I completely agree with Hodge and Lane about the most important 2 issues: FAIR and a new employment entitlement. Incidentally the UN declaration on Human Rights includes provisions on fair elections, management of poverty with government, and a right to employment. The conservative oligarchy controlling the US now just prefers to prescribe Victorian morals and a 17th century labor model instead of trusting the advice of their own ivy league professional classes. The FBI and DOJ needs to amend their missions to prosecute corruption and crony capitalism instead of scapegoating poor kids over failed drug, terrorism, and immigration laws.

We need hard whistleblower protections. Thank you for allowing us to have a voice. I am so proud of you this morning for giving us a chance. I knew there were more folks out here ready to move for the right reasons and I believe that this forum will be bigger than you could have imagined it to be. We all have answers to problems and many of us have fixed our American Dream within our personal circles. Maybe we will have the chance to share without the media drama so we can really impact the world.

We need to re-build our infrastructure, absolutely right. It would give us jobs. Also I think one of the best things we could do is to find a way to stop the people in Washington who can vote and approve their own annual raise from doing so!!

Can we put that on hiatus like everything else for the next yrs? Exponentially, how much would we save and free up of our tax dollars? This country has adopted the band-aid approach to fixing our problems. We need to start with getting rid of the IRS and enacting a flat sales tax. Legalize drugs, the crimes committed by drug dealers and users will go away. Public school is a disgrace.

The first thing we must do before we can achieve all the good things mentioned in the video and in these comments is to force politicians to represent the will of their constituents. We need a system for collecting and publishing constituent preferences on an issue-by-issue basis.

We have the technology. Until we take this first step, politicians will continue to say anything needed to get elected, then turn around and vote for what their parties, donors, and lobbyists want. Until we have that crucial piece of information, money and power — the two most corrupting forces known to man — will be the deciding factor for who runs and who gets elected. Until we have that information, Representative Democracy will remain a sham. Some country will figure out how to achieve this in the near future.

Once it happens somewhere, it will sweep the democratic world. I feel that a few of the wealthiest Americans should cease and desist in making their tax deductible contributions to various entities and GIVE a portion of their gazillions to bail out this wonderful country.

Wow well its a big question to answer quickly. But in my opinion most of those so call experts failed to answer the question. With the exception of the woman who talked about technology helping us was heading in the right direction. I as a regular member of the workforce in this state think that one of our countries biggest problems is illegal immigrants.

S has a employment problem less illegal immigrants in the U.

CEO Stephen Elop

Here is my example of how my concept could work: These Voting Kiosks could be located at every corner street, in every shopping mall across America, in every bar, in every bathroom, and can capture the decisions of every American willing to use them.

The Voting Kiosk would update every day and present the user with information and voting options for every issue, on every piece of legislation, on every crisis that this country faces, in real time, administered by respected and constantly revolving certified Information Services group.

Once the data is captured it is analyzed as to which way the majority of users voted. We can fix America by reducing spending occupying other nations in order to pour more funds into our own country, Government and corporations should be working together strongly to keep jobs in the US because that means growth for our nation, and lastly greed has hurt nation immensely, we should make sure that we keep a close eye on owners or landlords who own real estate, or rental apartments because prices are to high in these difficult times.

The time is now for a more United America in order to become a better State. We can fix America by reducing spending occupying other nations in order to pour more funds into our own country, Government and Corporations should be working together strongly to keep jobs in the US because that means more growth for our nation, and lastly greed has hurt nation immensely, we should make sure that we keep a close eye on owners and landlords who own real estate, or rental apartments because prices are to high in these difficult times.

The time is now for a more United America in order to be in a better State. Addressing the costs of unfettered population increases also must be addressed as a fix. I want to use technology to issue a receipt every time my tax dollars are used. This concept breaks down as follows: During the actual moment when I pay my taxes, I would like a selection of how much and into which category military, healthcare, education, social security, etc.

Then I would like a receipt when my tax dollars are actually tapped into, so I can verify that my desire for where and how my taxes were spent was met. Conceptually, the computer interface for this process would resemble the user interface similar to my k distribution and overview where I can select into which stocks my contribution goes.

To be clear, I am not saying that I choose how much taxes I pay, that is really not my decision and it is something we as a country decide. Nor, do I want to create categories, as again those will be decided by the country as a whole. I simply want the option to choose into which category my taxes go.

The lady who studies race relations only wanted everyone to talk about race. Find people that have reasonable answers before putting them on the air. Try professional journalists, not just one of the millions who published a book, write to a Web site, or live down the street.

Your first guy touched on at least one real problem that needs to be fixed: It could be improved but all that takes money too, from the govt tax the citizens , higher utility costs, and similar perhaps-hidden ways. But the Internet built itself out largely because it was driven by businesses seeing the financial benefit of a working, open, secure, and dependable worldwide communications network and business putting the infrastructure in place — and government largely staying out of the way.

It probably would take a constitutional amendment, but that could be as simple as: Even then, it would be an uphill battle since the current system favors incumbents, who usually can raise money more effectively than challengers, and incumbents will be reluctant to change a system that works so well for them.

If this can be done, though, politicians would not have to spend so much time with, and spend so much public money to curry the favor of, well-heeled donors looking for favors. Regulate the financial markets — and the financial instruments like derivatives — which lead to the financial meltdown in the first place.

Bailouts — as despicable as they are morally — are capable of generating a profit for the government, and should generate a profit as a way of addressing the moral hazard issue. Big financial institutions should feel such pain as a way of making them want to avoid bailouts. JBurke — If we want to fix america, I think we should prepare for the self-reliant, do-it-yourself future we MAY need to be prepared for.

I work with an educational, non-profit group, helping folks learn to make their own solar appliances and collectors. I like the Sedaris Craft section of the show, because it is for the poor folks, the ones who will show the way to the rest of us, handicapped, crippled by the Couch! The Gardeners and build-it-yourself, home-steaders, have the knowledge that All americans need to get it together in this New century!

The coming collapse of the transportation and infrastructure, will necessitate Our involvment with Our lives and lifestyles! I believe that if We are to fix america, We will have to prepare for the masses of americans needy for the knowledge! At least they are trying to start a discussion; focus on that rather than simply criticizing.

I agree with you though. But Roosevelt knew what he had to do: The WPA alone put eight million people to work in only a few years.

They created vital public resources that we still use today: If your town existed back in , you probably have at least one WPA project in your community. We can do the same today. We need new infrastructure, and we need to upgrade or repair existing facilities. We can simultaneously train a new generation of workers for careers in the sustainable energy industry. The WPA also hired writers, artists, poets, historians, and so on.

Throwing money at the rich has never helped once. Well, consumer demand will be depressed until people get back to work. I have never wanted to throw bricks at my TV before, I will have to control myself though because it is a fairly nice TV.

Maybe if I threw a brick at my TV that would help the U. One way to fix this nation is to reduce the power of the corporation. Our government leaders and representatives are caught up in the special interests of banks and corporations. A bought government is not one that serves the people of America. And it is not only our government.

Multinational corporations dominate the decision-making processes of the world. So we need a leader to get tough with corporations. Threaten them if they refuse to hire, despite financial recovery via the taxpayer, or continue to ship jobs overseas. Pull the plug on their charter if they continue to show such rash disregard for Americans. The corporation must become a means to close the ever-growiing disparity between rich and poor, and not an end in itself.

Civility is at risk of total collapse if we do not act. To expand upon the suggestion to provide public financing for elections, I would advocate a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on both members of the US House of Representatives and the US Senate.

Any candidate for either legislative body would be limited to a total of 6 years in office — 3 two year terms for members of the House and two 3 year terms for the US Senate. The objective of this amendment would be to greatly reduce if not eliminate, the influence of lobbies and political influence in Congressional actions. Finally, Congressional representatives would be provided retirement benefits via a K rather than a defined benefit plan and would be required to contribute and benefit from the Social Security program as is the norm for the vast majority of American workers.

I believe these changes will result in legislation that reflects the true voice of the people of the US and will allow us to come to grips with the great challenges facing our country today.

Find a way to fix the global economic imbalance. Even as China owns so much of our debt — and undervalues their own currency — they keep selling to us more and more. Tariffs are a naughty word because other nations will simply impose their own, but perhaps a consumption tax might cause Americans to consume less and invest more. Ideally, Americans need to start selling our goods overseas more but our legacy costs, etc. But, it would be better to develop foreign markets than reduce American wages.

Pam, please think about what you are advocating with term limits. Your argument for them makes absolutely no sense. They will self aggandise themselves even worse than they do now. There are already term limits possible for crappy legislators, it is called intelligent and informed voters.

I should like to correct my previous post: I think too many special interests, too much influence of congress, too many handouts, the social security system is broke, too many ineffective programs. So here are my radical ideas: All citizens over 18 receive a monthly stipend of? No one will get rich and no one will starve.

A national sales tax of? Imported items have an extra? Foreign transfers to be taxed at? An annual tax of? Medicare for everybody paid for by items 2 and 3. Private insurance companies are contracted to insure a population — county? The focus being on preventative rather than acute care as a flat amount is contracted per person.

Profits of the insurance company to be capped at? All citizens are entitled to trimester credits of free post secondary education including books, lab fees, etc.

In other words a free bachelor degree. Reduce the departments to core functions: Eliminate Housing, Labor, Agricuture etc. This will take some discussion. Eliminate or reduce all federal employee pension programs. This would have to be phased in over 30 years to be fair to existing employees.

Reduce, through attrition, the size of the federal government employee base. There will be no need for these employees. Eliminate corporate subsidies — ethanol, tobacco, agriculture, etc. States are responsible for education, local highways, local highways, etc. Item 1 eliminates welfare, item 5 eliminate Medicaid or similar. This is just a start. Its radical and our relationship with the federal government will be completely revised as will the motive base of our leaders to us.

Thank you for your consideration of these ideas. You would not just term limit lousy ones. Some are actually good and do the right thing as well as honor their oath to uphold the Constitution, sure there are darn few but would you not want to hold on to them?

I concure, we need to get away from giving people money just just because they are out of work or do not have medical issurance. Instead, have the cityh, state, govt give people jobs and make them earn that money we now give them anyway, but now have them do work around the country in the area they are trained in, this keeps people up on their education while giving schools people to assist or cities extra people to clean up the streets, or brick layers putting up walls, put the people to work and not give money away just because?

Another way to fix America is to examine our tax structure. The American economy was pretty good from the s to the s. During that time, we had plenty of money to pay for important public services. We always have the chance to vote people out of office.

But term limits make it impossible to keep good people in. Consider the case of Brian X. Throughout his political career, the same word has followed him: He served in the Brookhaven Town government. Although the town government was long a hotbed of corruption, he went untainted, and was broadly respected by Democrats and Republicans alike. Then he went to the Suffolk County Legislature, where he served until he was term-limited out of office. So when ho was term-limited out, we sent him to the NYS Senate.

He was voted out this year for a single issue — his opposition of a tax rebate program that was over-priced, largely worthless, and ammounted to little more than a program to provide easy votes for incumbents.

He voted his conscience, and was sent packing. One way I would fix America is by exposing the foolishness and fallacy of what most conservatives spew as truth. Your guy who would fix America by giving everyone vouchers lives in a magical world where people, by default, act rationally. Any look at actual data of human behavior shows that people have a high tendency to be guided by emotion. People with vouchers will be at least as likely to use them to buy lottery tickets as they are to buy milk.

Untill Lincoln the first republican President the words national and federal were not used commonly in reference to government agenceys or indpendent groups. I believe the one best change to make to fix America is to limit senators and congressmen to two terms, just like the limit on the presidency.

This would reduce considerably the big money corporate influence on our politicians. When corporations give money to politicial campaigns it causes special interest and almost always is a determent to the American citizen. Here in a Kentucky electric book was mentioned how a Nebraskan US Senator as being key to the passage and development of TVA program and spear heading the rural electrification program. Did you think he knew child labor? Became a country teacher, a small town lawyer, local prosecuting attorney then judge.

George Norris as the local judge saw a growing pattern of farm foreclosures and lost homesteads and farmers and their hands forced into the cities and further unemployment. This was the time of the robber barons. Here Kentucky there was tobacco barons, which often set tobacco prices, well below the costs to grow that tobacco.

This was wiping out small farmers and the barons then scooped up their farms on pennies on the dollar, same was going on all over. Judge Norris knew what hard work farming really was and soon he ran as a Republican Reformer. What is the one thing that helps you get folks vote? We have to do that the hard way.

That is why there are so many attack ads! Do you think normal folks can weather the amount of attack ads leveled this election? But in this election there was nothing and no rules. Do you think a lame duck Congress is going to push for reform? Would you write your Congressman and Senator for such a reform?

I, as a young boy, having seen the career of another fiscally conservative, Bill Proxmire Dem of Wisconsin, because my grandfather helped him get into the US Senate. He had failed to become Governor of Wisconsin and wanted to run again for the post. My grandfather talked him into running for the US Senate seat instead. I think one of the first things you have to look at is the constitution. It can not be static but has to be dynamics to reflect the times we live in.

A good example is the preacher in Florida who treaten the security of a nation, but because of the constitution f cluases government could not have step in to stop him.

One way of doing that might be to do away with elections and make it like jury duty for a few months per year. Lets get real people in the gov. Stop wasting money on elections. Also, set the federal and state governments on a percentage based budget — i. They cannot spend more than comes in. Fix the percent tax at one point and leave it alone. Wild growth is what cancer does i.

For a change we could give up being total idiots! All this dealing just asks for corruption. If individual Americans want to help others let them, but get the dang gov out of the foreign aid business. Limit government to exact specific functions, keep it small, and leave it alone. This could be accessed by anyone who needs to know the best that humans understand in all areas of interest. What the heck is the big hurry to destroy everything in sight?

Stop paving the world. This is not progress it is greed. Systems based on chasing money and greed cannot be the best — get real. It seems that the what we call capitalism should really be called rape. Plus it would save all that energy. You have a very good point, especially in regards to mental health services. So many receiving ssd, housing, free very costly medications manage to screw up everything by taking other illegal drugs. This is as as insane as these people we waste billions on.

And everyother person you meet has bi-polar disorder. No ONE thing will fix America. First of all, we have become The Divided States of America. Something legal in one state is illegal in the next. They are stuck in a vicious or deadly cycle. Have food stamp cards that issue only a balanced portion of each food group-not excessive candy and soda, etc.

Build orphanages instead of prisons. Good parenting is learned. If a pedophile shows up- hang him. Build factories in small towns again- utilizing local talent and energies. And with the money mom and dad are making working- they can buy that weekend outfit- to let them and their friends go to the dance hall - that local tax dollars help build - to shake off some excess teenage energy.

Let overweight community members use it also. Have huge indoor areas to farm locally- during inclement weather. Get rid of tenure for teachers. What purpose does it really serve? Modern day forensics have made it way easier to catch criminals.

Deal with it- no lengthy trial. Make Dental care available and affordable for everyone. This problem stems back for years. Years of career politicians in both houses. These career politicians have turned their backs on the people they are sworn to serve and instead serve the wealthy and the big corporations who roam the halls of our legislative buildings with pockets full of money, luxury vacations and bribes to buy the votes on legislation that favors their insatiable greed.

Our public servants have willingly given large tax breks to corporations who send American jobs overseas and have continued to provide a loophole where these same companies are allowed to funnel profits earned here in the States out of this country so it is not taxed. Despite the suffering by the working people of this country in the toughest times since the great depression our career politicians still thumb their noses at their consitiuents. What did they care, really?

They are elected to office and have a job with a regular paycheck coming in to keep food on their tables! When will we as a nation ever learn? We need to start with a clean slate!!! Clearly, our elected officials have been and continue to be out of touch with the reality that the rest of us must live each and every day.

This is not a game as it appears to be by the actions of our legislators. But because of our arrogance and complacency we are now financially indebeted to China for trillions of dollars. We could also use the billions of dollars spent on wars around the world. After the capture of Saaddam Hussein we watched the news broadcasts of our soldiers taking possession of so much US money stacked on shipping skids that the soldiers had to use forklifts to load the skids onto semi trucks.

We have never heard of where this money went!! We spent taxpayer money to fight this war and then to rebuild after the destruction and will eventually pay through the nostrils for oil from this same nation! Greed has consumed America! We blame it on free enterprise but only have to look at our neighbors to the north and be perplexed!

Just look at the drug manufacturers! We have US citizens crossing the border into Canada to get more affordable drugs — not unavailable drugs.

Yes, drug companies are ripping off the American people by charging them considerably more for the same drugs that are being sold across the border in Canada for substantially less! We get receipts every year from the OMB. You can download these reports to your computer and not waste paper, by the ton and dollars by the millions making receipts for everything.

Here are some links too you may find useful. Marian, Tons of people would agree with you. Just try to use some common sense and change this and every nut comes out of the woodwork to protest and our incompetent politicians back off. There are many solutions but no means to make them happen. I teach freshman environmental economics at my local community college in Ft Collins, Colorado, and feel strongly enough on this issue to comment tonight. Their work is highly relevant to your mission, and, in fact, cries out for greater attention for their simple attesting to the truth of how we could move towards greater peace by a better understanding of our history.

I hope you check out their works. There is a school of thought that says: Gas- Transmission fluid- Quart low on Oil…oops? That is why he had the Golden Fleece Award! In Kentucky in my area Lexington, there was hours of attack ads, but only 3.

Getting to the root of a political problem is controlling the attack ads and holding TV stations that run those attack ads to run right behind them ads listing their truthfulness and who paid for that ad. If there is a bunch, guess what a website could be listed in the ad in which contributors would be listed in rank, 1st to last, by amount given. We as consumers of these attack ads have the right to know both and just think of the jobs that would be created!

So how do we stop spending most of our medical funds in the last two months of life? How do we get past the hospitals that make a fortune off these patients? How do we get our politicians from backing off when the ignorant fanatics begin their howling about how we are trying to kill them? This is not a new idea. Its been around for decades. We seem to be entirely impotent to get any viable solutions to our social and economic problems solved. If I lived on another planet I might have observed that out government is halariously incompetent.

The corrupt part is never funny. This is how we we all go to hell in a handbasket. He examines how changes in the distributions of income and wealth have affected consumer spending patterns and suggests policy reforms to mitigate the harm caused to middle-income families by rising inequality.

Promoting Heterolskedastic growth out of the recession would lower consumption and GDP growth outward from the recession. I reference Korea after This would lead to a longer slower recovery the middle-class is consumption and protecting the middle-class should be the goal of our government.

We have for too long sacrificed the middleclass and protected the wealthy. No one at PBS probably has any clue about how much like the blind men and women and the elephant this segment was like. Each of them with their own limited visions with only a few offering suggestions that would have a major impact. Something that would have a very healthy impact on the U. That would free up jobs for Americans, make foreign countries take care of their own people instead of sending them to the U.

For an example of the latter, some politicians look the other way on illegal immigration because they want votes, others look the other way because they receive donations from companies and banks that profit from illegal immigration. Fighting against that would reduce corruption and make government more accountable to the vast majority of Americans rather than small special interests.

The problem, of course, is that PBS is itself too corrupt to have an honest debate about that issue or to hold politicians accountable. If you want to oppose massive public and private corruption and help free up jobs for hundreds of thousands of Americans, help promote that plan. I would ask all employers to create a schedule for their full time employees to volunteer in public schools 4 hours per month.

So many children are failing and need that one-one attention that teachers are unable to give during the school day. I have been amazed at what the presence of a parent evokes in my daughters classmates. We need more involved parents and citizens!

Fixing America means more than just blindly fixing unemployment. It means making all workers more competitive in those industries in which America already has or can easily develop significant comparative advantages in the Global Economy. If you want to bone up on new skills in your industry, or in some other industry that you are passionate about entering, you should be able to access a national Open University, Login, and start taking high quality first-rate classes in any subject of your choice for free!

Why do I think that this would fix America? The focus of Open University courses would be on subjects that would equip students to start export-oriented entrepreneurial businesses; businesses that would export new, innovative products, services and systems to the huge new countries overseas with increasingly affluent middle-class consumers: How would this program be funded, and where would the high-quality professors come from? Also, maybe major textbook companies could earn corporate tax discounts if they allowed all their state-of-the art texts to be made available free online to Open-University students.

Furthermore, maybe Computer software companies would allow Open University students to down-load and use training versions of their software which would expire in say a year, so that lots of new people could very quickly acquire state-of the art technical and programming skills.

The software companies would gain legions of new software users and future customers, and may also save on taxes? How could students earn credentials, and standards be enforced? Maybe there could be national exam centers in each city or state that could allow anyone to pay a nominal exam fee and sit for a proctored exam, and eventually earn a certificate or maybe even a degree!

The funds for administration of the computer servers for this open university as well as the advisors could all be from Corporate donors, based on the model used by public television stations, or could use pop-up commercial ads as they do on Face Book, Google and Yahoo?. This may be naive, but shirking their corporate responsibility to provide free instruction, equipment and entrepreneurial business guidance would result in massive new corporate tax liabilities imposed at either the State or Federal levels!

This blueprint would also return some measure of economic justice to the system of wealth creation that used to be available to Middle class Americans. Certainty about the future price of gasoline would allow Americans to make judicious choices when buying automobiles. Our Trade imbalance would improve, and regimes such as Iran, Venezuela, and Russia would lose much of their economic clout. Then we can talk about a tax on sugar….

Print lots of money! Of course, no one will loan us any more money, which is good because our government will be forced to live within its means. It will be forced to spend only what it receives in taxes. Imports will be very expensive which will force us all to buy local products. This will make our exports very competitive. SE Asian and Haitian workers crank out widgets for pennies an hour. This policy would be the road to years of subservience to China.

How to fix America? What good are a bunch of ideas unless they are developed, organized and used to form some sort of structure that empowers people.

Good Ideas lead to path-breaking new industries like the ones that were created in the s bt Steve Jobs and Buill Gates. I wish I had your faith in the majority. Look at the election and how many people voted against their own self interests. The best real-life example of a country that squandered its opportunities, that just printed money to produce widgets is Argentina after the first world war.

But then Argentina refused to invest a dime in national brainpower or infrastructure, and is still relegated to its fourth-class status as a commodities and local widgets producer…. Well, hopefully someone influential, wealthy, and very powerful, somewhere in our vast country will read some of these posts and use some of them positively……The authors of this website appear to be genuinely interested in improving America.

You never know who will see these ideas! Forcing everyone to have insurance will just cause more of the same problems that we are all familiar with. I for one would like to see medical cost come down. Why not pass a law that prevents anyone from having insurance. Costs and the structure of the medical establishment would change overnight.

I think you would quickly begin to see competitive subscription based medicine and we would all benefit if we could suffer the transition. Interestingly enough no one talked about the military, yet the 2 most costly and least effective government funded operations of the decade have been the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

It is widely accepted that both wars are over Oil Iraq and Minerals estimated 1 trillion in Afghanistan , rather than the stabilization of the world. There are so many atrocities committed by us because of our military attachment to the colonial industrialization of the third world. We need to shutdown and remove all foreign military operations. All foreign bases, all american troops returned back to their own soil. Maybe then we can truly our example of freedom being a good thing, and maybe then we can fix these domestic problems-i.

Without a single exception, all of the selected experts opined without hesitation a remedy for which they neither acknowledged nor explained the source of the malady for which their specific brand of remedy was a sure fired cure. And yet, with all of their collective knowledge and expertise, not one of them paid any attention to, let alone explained how, or to what extent the Constitution relates to the very issues they rise to address.

It never ceases to amaze me how thoughtless the majority of people in this country have become. Their memories are short-lived, and their ability to remain focused on the principles upon which this nation was founded is virtually non-existent.

The real malady America faces is the failure of its people to believe that the true source of their strength, protection, and prosperity resides in the very document that binds us all to each other.

The only reason my speech is protected is because your speech is protected. The logic of these fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution is unassailable. The moment we deny anyone the same rights and protections we all believe in, that is the moment we all become slaves to oppression. You want to fix America? Then start believing in, and adhering to the very same ideas and principles the Founding Fathers created and intended to pass on to each and every succeeding generation of Americans.

What we could all use more of is appreciation for what we get from the taxes we pay and empathy for those folks who step up to represent us. The I-Phone comment sounds glib. Maybe we could use less misinformation from both the government and the media and stop looking at these problems as being too complicated or too deeply rooted to be changed.

If that is your feeling, and you do work in government, then maybe it is time for you to look for work in the private sector, because the critics are only going to get worse.

The best way to fix America is to create an enviorment in which the middle class can flourish. If we returned to any of federal income tax rates between and we could put an end to the deficit, balance out Social Security and create a more stable political enviorment for the USA by creating a more robust middle class. A second idea that goes hand in hand with a return to earlier tax rates is to return to credit card interest deductions on federal income tax.

The people that do are mostly struggling middle class families. We need a commission to investigate and prosecute white collar crime. The lying cheating and stealing has to stop. The laws of the land are not being enforced or punished.

Put the offenders in jail. Sit back and watch the US flourish. Until then, more of the same. I would start by renewing the fairness doctrine. Since the loss of the Fairness Doctrine in , our nation has descended to near civil war. We have corporations like Fox News who benefit from strife and that strife is killing us. We solve nothing but fight everything. As opposed to discussing the issues of Health Care Reform, we discussed death panels, and not the ones in the insurance companies.

That is beneficial for everyone. Also, if tv has to give equal time, then corporations are not encouraged to buy up big blocks of our politicians because all ideas have to get out anyhow. We need to adopt policies and attitudes that minimize harm to people and to the environment. Currently public policy attempts to harm people who possess and use marijuana. Billions of dollars are spent on police and courts while billions more fund an uncontrolled underground economy which is currently killing tens of thousands of people, many near the US-Mexico boarder.

With a simple change of attitude marijuana can be controlled similar to alcohol and cigarettes. Substantial tax income can be used to fund education and treatment programs to help minimize the social costs. Some people would like to see everyone who receives public assistance be tested for drugs. The subtext is that we need to weed out the drug users. If we adopt harm reduction as our primary goal all drug use is considered a medical issue.

No one gets incarcerated for using drugs. With a simple attitude change we separate the drugs from the guns. Drugs are not the problem.

People hurting themselves and others is the problem. People need help with their problems, not threats. The US spends way too much money on the military. If our primary goal is harm reduction world wide then the use of force is the last option. Trillions of dollars can be saved world wide with much of it coming directly from US tax payers. For every dollar we spend on the military we need to spend a dollar on aid which directly helps people. Real benefit to all people and the environment comes from simply endorsing harm reduction.

If the American people were truly represented by our elected officials,most of these problems would be handled in a way we could all accept.

The American political process is out-dated and ineffective. It leaves the American people unrepresented and at the mercy of whoever has the most money to throw around. Since the challenge makes me omnipotent and I can now do things that are not actually possible, I would enact a constitutional amendment that is elegantly simple but would completely change how we govern ourselves and the effectiveness of that governance: That can not be allowed to continue if we really expect our republic to work.

A poor person has one voice. A rich person has one voice. A group of people have a voice for each member. Let their voices be heard and not just their dollars. Needed is a Mandatory program of national service with both civilian and military read draft options — choice left to the citizen.

Civic action begins at home. But first, we need to stop killing people in foreign lands and bring ALL the troops home. How many foreign countries have military installations within the US? This from a 70ish former anti-draft Army lifer.

It is critical to get at root causes in any attempt to fix America. We are among the most unequal of all industrialized nations with regard to the ever-growing gap between rich and poor. Such rampant inequality eventually destroys trust since inherent in such a scheme is the assumption that everyone is out to take advantage of everyone else. Substandard distribution of health care, our broken economic system, our relegation of ethical principles to the shadows and other quality of life indices can be traced to rewarding the greedy among us that is, rewarding inequality and distrust.

Corporations dominate and rule without any other motive than short-term profit maximization, rendering any consideration of the higher values of human social life anathema to their ruthless modus operandi. As long as this paradigm is encouraged to continue, there will be an exponential destruction of equality and trust in our society — not a winning strategy for U. What will our new future be? Suggestion to improve our country: Reinstate the military draft.

That would increase employment. It will take a large group of citizens to formulate a doctrine of principles and agree to only vote for those candidates that agree to follow those specific principles.

In other words transparency and integrity. There is not even a decent shoulder when getting out of my neighborhood. It is not safe. The more we drive — the less we wal — the more health problems we have. So my 2 cents in: More sidewalks and bike lanes! I would encourage the men to all take responsibility. We have traded our power over government for being governed by bankers and politicians.

The only stand anyone seems to take is special interest, rather than the interest of everyone. Democracy has allowed majority groups power over individuals, and we need to hold liberty as our highest priority as our founding fathers did. Interesting comment, regardless of degree or positional power, are you ready to pay that price? No, you and I alike should live up to our values alike. As someone who works in federal government, I know well that the only way to fix it is to work in or on it, and I invite others who have nothing but complaints to roll up their sleeves as well.

I think the huge realization we need to make here in the US is that we must change our business model from expansion to sustainability. I think education is our biggest priority. Not just for children, but for illiterate and undereducated adults, possibly classes in Life Skills-the practicalities of life. Educate people that without a viable middle class, there WILL BE a feudal type of society — a plutocracy — just what we are seeing now.

I would fix American by instilling greater compassion and empathy in our children. Hopefully those children will grow into adults who will demand a government that meets the basic needs of its people health care, jobs, education and does not cater to the whims of powerful corporations and wealthy individuals.

I believe we will have to wait for future generations to carry out this mission since we who are currently adult citizens seem powerless or, worse, unwilling to do so. I say make service obligatory to citizenship. And leaders are chosen by a study of their achievements and merits, and if chosen to office have it be mandatory. Those that wish to be in politics should definitely be excluded. Political office as punishment for preemminence of personhood.

Finally, end earmarks and balanced budgets mandatory. Oh and also control the wide open borders. End all affirmative action and other separatist paradigmns. Wipe clean the tax laws and start from scratch. Tax breaks should be created for businesses that manufacture renewable energy components domestically.

To be effective, they should be in place for years, followed by a gradual phase-out, over several years. I would educate parents on how to raise children with integrity so that they have the best opportunity to be a happy and productive citizen of the world.

I would fix America by fixing our education system. Where is science and art in grammar school? It went with the budget-cuts. Legal bribes lobbying should cease immediately. Raising money for Congressional re-elections has to cease being a hour job.

Governments must govern, not obstruct. America could be so much better. If I could do one thing to fix America, I would change our constitution so that only individual people could contribute to the campaigns of elected officials, that they could only contribute small amounts, and that they could only contribute to candidates for whom they are eligible to vote.

Until we get control of Congress back from big money, nothing else is going to get fixed. The first step we should take is to stop blaming the govt.

Americans made their own decisions to go into debt, spend wildly, and put their own financial future at risk by purchasing homes, cars, and other things. Seconly, we need to recalibrate. We need to cut defense spending and space exploration and put those dollars back into infrastructure, education, and technology.

This will spur jobs. Finally, we need to find a way to bring back compassion and civility. I feel like I alone know what the solution to our economic problems are although Donald Trump touched on it recently on a TV show.

He said we ought to tax China heavily or put tariffs on imported goods from China. This will not be a complete solution. Our problem is that American corporations and banks have sold our country out: We need to severely restrict the production of goods overseas for sale in the US!! Our problem is we have no competent central control of our economy; rather, we have this doctrinaire blind faith in the haphazard free market system which is also responsible for the wild cyclic swings of bubbles and busts.

Clearly brokers and investment bankers love and promote this system. They need not trade in the market themselves since market euphoria and later panics generate lots of transactions and commissions which they thrive on. This Adam Smith notion that everyone benefits society by pursuing their own self interests is nonsense.

What I said above will require government action which the republicans loath because American businesses created this situation and therefore certainly they are not going to reverse it; they have every interest in continuing it. Then we will see that at best nothing will improve. In fact, things will most likely get worse.

I felt he would not address the fundamental problem and all the democrats have been doing is mask the problems by putting bandaids on them. I thought those on your show gave good suggestions though. I especially liked the one that said all campaigns should be prohibited from being financed by special interests. I say the free market system, as expected, has reached the end of the road and our economy will languish for many, many years because people will not accept that our path is flawed.

I have little hope for the USA. We eventually will have a revolution or a civil war. And, we all know from high school many people will not do well in college. We have had a false economy since the tech bubble which in about the time it burst Greenspan replaced it by a housing bubble by dropping interest rates.

What Obama, Bernanke, and later the republicans will do is just perpetuate the illusion which is in reality an economic failure. The corporate elite serving their own self interests took away millions of jobs from Americans and put them on the street.

And to think I once envisioned the day when the employee would be asked for their input into how their job was done and even on some of the design of the product. I thought some of the drudgery of these jobs would be alleviated in this way. So now we also have astounding trade deficits as a consequence! Many people have enumerated how they would incite change, but we need to address the reasons behind the changes as well.

Not only is this a good monetary policy in general, but it is good on moral grounds as well. Disproportionate distribution of wealth is naturally divisive, as Aristotle and many other political philosophers have stated through-out history.

Therefore it is socially advantages to limit distribution of wealth to more moderate fluctuations. A progressive tax does this rather well, as the more you earn, the more you pay out in taxes, respectively. MRK-As technology continues to progress the only logical path is for the government to become more and more transparent. I believe this invariably leads to increased criticism. You need a thick skin to work in the public eye.

If you are in public service for public gratification and satisfaction you are in the wrong place. If you are in it because you believe in your work and you are getting the satisfaction you need, then you are the right person for the job and I wish we had more like you. Resources are being gobbled up at an ever-expanding rate! Is the subject taboo to all the news agencies of the world? As predicted by many writers of that era, the problem is compounded by the poor out-breeding those that produce the excess that feeds them.

That we have allowed millions more poor, unchecked breeders into the country is beyond belief. China has already initiated measures to keep their resources at home.

I love the intelligence shown by their government, is it because they only answer to to their future generations? They CARE about what their children will have to deal with and act accordingly. The US will soon be overtaken by China as the leader of the world for the simple reason that their government deals in reality and thinks further ahead than the next election. As proof of the validity of my assertion that the US is doomed to fall, I offer one piece of evidence: My plan to fix America is simply: Too many times those countless Americans who have workable ideas to do great things find that they must first get permission from government.

Even those good ideas that have some beneficial impact on our society have to first wait months or years before being allowed to move forward. In the meantime, all Americans wait for good solutions that do not come. This has got to be reversed. Government must realize that it is up to the American People to decide, to act, to do, and to solve.

If you restore Liberty, then the nine people shown in the video above can immediately begin to implement their plans. With the current mindset we have, too much precious time will be spent by those nine trying to first convince government that their ways are worthwhile. How long will this take?

How many generations must wait for government forces to shift momentum in the direction that these voices are advocating? If government steps down from its decision-making post and the mass of American individuals step up into that spot—AKA: But as long as we Americans think that we must wait for government to come up with solutions before any action can be taken, we will find ourselves waiting too long. By restoring Liberty, those many good things that millions of people DO can be seen and copied by others who also want and need solutions, while those bad things that some people try can be identified as futile and discarded by millions without hesitation.

So my message to Government is: I am a good man who can do good things. There are millions of others like me. Stop trying to convince me with all of your new rules and regulations that I need permission from you to do these things. Give me restored freedom so I can be free to do my part to fix America. And one last thing, government: If I and millions of others who do great things do find ourselves needing your help, we will tell you what to do.

What concerns me more than economic disaster is the people who are letting it happen: The fact of the matter is that we are not being well represented, and that fact reflects poorly on two things: The vote is, in essence, a peaceful revolutionary mechanism. Every election is a chance for us to put a new regime into power, literally.

The unfortunate truth is that Americans today are not well educated in matters of government, which is why we are engaged in wars across the globe, our economy is on the verge of collapse, and our lives are being destroyed by the very people we put into power to better them. Beyond civic literacy there is also a need for drastic political reform. As I said before, our government does not function in our best interest as it should. Voting today is little more than a popularity contest, and the candidates we chose are often not up to the Herculean task of governing or representing.

So, that being said, the first part of my second fix is readdressing the requirements to hold a position as important and enabling as a senior political officer.

Second, if you allowed leaders to own property, there comes the temptation to use their influence to better their own standings… as is often the case in contemporary politics. So, with that being said, I would likely implement a similar rule. Any political officer would be obligated to relinquish any and all assets to the state. Such is the cost of leading, which is a great honor and privilege that needs no monetary compensation or temptation.

The second part of my fix is means testing. Means testing is a test designed to test eligibility, in this case of both voters and candidates. Today, medical and bar tests that doctors and lawyers must pass in order to practice their trade could be considered means tests. That being said, voters and political officers would be similarly tested: You, the voter, are the doctor, and the legislation you pass and the people you bring to power are the tools and the treatments used on the system.

Would you rather have a professional doctor, with years of rigorous training and innumerable hours of practice do brain surgery on you? Or would you rather have average Joe do it? These, although rather drastic and extreme by most peoples standards, are a few very viable solutions to a very specific problem.

Do bear in mind that I am addressing the human portion of the equation, and only a very small portion of it. Nevertheless, these are important points to ponder…. Republicans didn't hold a secret meeting in the Batcave with Bush saying "we need to take Iraq for ourselves.

Believing in conspiracies doesn't mean you're smarter than everyone else. There are things that happen but many of you just won't accept reality. When most CLEAR thinking people know things just happened, people like you excuse it by saying "you're misguided" or "you fell for their propaganda".

There hasn't been a historical event that ever happened that's not come into question by you people. You come up with these ridiculous conspiracies because it helps you feel smarter than you actually are. What is funny though is that you think you have the "real" answer on things. The "real" history of what really happened.

Got a bunch of Dale Gribbles from "King of the Hill" around now. Bush had the Navy come out with its own color so that way they could build the foundation for the dumb conservatives to fall for their future propoganda. They had help from the Israelis because as you know, the Israelis are always in on everything we do, man. Jesse Norman September 22, 9: Impeachment may not happen, those in Washington do not seem to be listening. It may all come down to our vote in the next ellection.

The next President is critical if we want to avoid the mistake of escalating this situation and letting it get out of hand. The lesson of Viet Nam is not what some have determined -- that we went in with out an intention to win. This is an erroneous conclusion. Iraq is a war we cannot win. The numbers show the failure of such a strategy. We must elect someone who will change the strategy and work for a solution to the mess we have gotten ourselves into.

Winning is no longer the issue. Damage control is the issue. I was in high school between and , I have lived through the disruption and societal upheaval already, take my word, we do not want to repeat this. MLM September 22, 9: I am a New Yorker as well and I second your notion. There are many unanswered questions and debate is silenced and dying. The neo-con republicans are unmistakably sophisticated in their ability to manipulate debate through talking points and character assassination.

No other political organization comes close to approaching their cohesiveness, dogmatism and funding. They are shaping the world to benefit an elite cadre of ultra-wealthy and have displayed moral ambiguity and killer instinct that liberals lack.

Because regardless of neocon talking points, easy-on-the-brain mantras, and general misdirection, our Constitution and the foundations of Democracy are being and have been corroded. Whether Republican or Democract or Non-affiliated independent, the fact of the matter is the majority does not benefit from the neocon rise to power.

Exploitation of the American people and regardless of our differences, the net effect has been suffering inflicted by Americans on Americans. Who will shoulder the burden of a trillion dollar war? Why is a public fresh with the memory of Enron so complacent when this looming spectre of economic mismanagement and book cooking threatens the masses? Perhaps the wrong talking point is being used? Perhaps the public should be told they are being "taxed". This war inflicts a tax that will be paid by each and every citizen and their children for generations to come.

It will be paid by regular folks that are struggling to maintain quality of life taken for granted by our parents. When the government buys billion dollars of fighter planes, that money is coming from us. That's billion less for schools, for hospitals, for roads, for police, for every thread in the fabric of our community. And none of that money was spent to make us safer. Millions of innocent lives have been destroyed by US military action in Iraq.

Are we so egocentric as a society to ignore the injustice in attacking and invading a sovereign nation? Or lacking in empathy to see the Iraqi anger that is fermenting from this invasion? The reality is that the US has caused destruction that destabilizes an entire region, affecting hundreds of millions of lives.

The reality is that the neocons continue a drumbeat of war to renew their coffers. The reality is that the current administration uses terror as tool, no less so than the terrorists they purport to battle. There is an elemental wisdom that transcends time and place. That wisdom offered by Socrates, Buddha, Confucious and others is that we should ask questions, of ourselves and of society.

For knowledge, for enlightenment, for responsibility, we must question. In light of this simple wisdom, we must ask questions of our leaders. Why was French intelligence ignored? Why did the towers collapse like a controlled demolition. Why were there no explosives forensics allowed on the rubble. Why was there a powerdown of security systems prior to the attack.

Why were bomb sniffing dogs removed. There are so many questions unanswered, so much debate silenced under the the suffocating muffle of flag and cross. We repeat history's mistakes. A nation stands by as innocents die. Was Nazi Germany so different? Is our jingoism and religious fervor no less manipulated? When we stop questioning, when we allow debate to be controlled by an elite cadre of avarice, we allow atrocities to be committed.

Nor has it been held accountable for the crimes it has committed in Iraq. Why is the question we should all be asking. I'm dismayed, however, that you have not incorporated any of the dozens and dozens of questions being posed by the Truth. Polls are registering huge percentages of people who believe that key members of the American government were complicit in the attack http: Many of the brightest technical minds are on board with this.

Many key people in positions of authority are also. These latter two issues are frequent topics on your program. It is a brave step, but it is one that could lead to the real truth, the truth that we must have. Please do not dismiss the questions, nor the inconvenient answers until you have read the arguments.

Droves and droves of people are seeing the light as I see it. Please come along with us on this quest. Jade September 21, Jesse, you refuse to believe the obvious when it comes to Bush but quickly believe anything negative about Clinton. As an independent I hold all accountable. September 21, Jesse Norman September 21, 8: I am a regular viewer of Bill Moyers Journal and applaud you for giving voice to so many courageous people. Your reality I think is peyote-laced, with all due respect.

I think your continual posting of "The real reason we're in Iraq" is something you have saved on your computer and you post that same thing on every blog you find. No way someone repeats themselves like that in verbatim unless they have it saved. If that's true, then that's really disturbing. You can have your own take on reality. I want no part of it. Jesse Norman September 20, 1: Go ahead and live with your attitude against Clinton if it makes you happy. If you have time open your mind up to reality.

Jay P September 18, I hate people that's the one true emotion that calls me out to challenge them to a difficult round of it I was born to stick the needle in the balloon heads of the world You guys really are funny with your views.

What if I don't get rid of the chip on my shoulder over Clinton? Jay P, if you were speaking on this thread you'd sound like a tape recorder. This is the third time you've said that same exact thing, one on another thread. Guess what I asked three times to you Jesse Norman September 18, Jesse Norman You seem to make many assumptions when it relates to Clinton but are very defensive with Bush.

Get rid of the big chip on your shoulder. An influential group of conservatives convinced President George W. Bush that it was in America's best interests to conquer Iraq as a first step toward dominating the oil-producing nations in the Middle East.

There was no "exit plan" because we never intended to exit. The plan was, and is, to build military bases in Iraq and stay there forever. Our leaders see Iraq as a place to make money. Jay P September 17, 5: If you have not let your congress critters know your views on impeaching the current occupant and his puppet master I strongly encourage you to do so.

If you do not know how to contact these people here is a URL that will help resolve that small item http: Let your elected officials know what you are thinking and what you'd like them to do, while there is still time and before all your rights are taken away by the imperial shrub. Steve S September 17, 4: While the Congress hesitates to impeach the President and Vice President, what are the alternatives for citizens who think that the President and Vice President have committed crimes against the nation?

For instance, is making a collective citizen's arrest a possibility? Indeed, the laws of citizens arrest appear to be predicated upon the effectiveness of the Second Amendment. Simply put, without firepower, people are less likely going to be able to make a citizen's arrest. A random sampling of the various states as well as the District of Columbia indicates that a citizen's arrest is valid when a public offense was committed in the presence of the arresting private citizen or when the arresting private citizen has a reasonable belief that the suspect has committed a felony, whether or not in the presence of the arresting citizen.

If committing a felony is the benchmark for determining whether a crime has been committed, are violations of their oath of office felonies. For instance, if they violated their oath to support and defend the constitution of the United States, is that violation a felony? Roger Chapanis September 16, Although I don't feel he did enough if anything at all to prevent it, Al Qaeda was hitting us all over the world when Clinton was in office and Clinton did absolutely nothing about any attack.

Failed to kill Osama: Here's something you won't like reading though. Sudan offered Clinton three times for them to capture Bin Laden, ship him to Saudi Arabia where we could then take him. Clinton said "we can't get him on anything under international law" so he refused.

He denies this, but he was caught on audio tape not only getting these offers but declining. Manipulating emotion for Iraq war: I totally disagree, but that's just my opinion as it is yours. Blaming Katrina on Bush is just foolish. While he may have not acted quick enough, the citizens who were trapped in New Orleans were supposed to have been evacuated.

Mayor Nagin released a free dvd a year before Katrina saying if there was a Cat. Those who had no way of leaving would have school buses escort them out of the city. This didn't happen in Katrina. New Orleans didn't evacuate and the buses were left under the water just like everything else.

Is Bush supposed to tell the mayor and governor to evacuate their own citizens? No, that's their job. Blaming Bush for this is ludicrous. Bush is President and can nominate who he wants. Corruption in congress is Bush's fault? Republicans had Abramov and the democrats have Hsu. Hsu was a fugitive from the law for larceny when he did his fundraising. The addresses of those who donated, collected by Hsu gave as much as many of their homes were worth.

I'll skip down to global warming: Did you know Mars is warming even at a faster rate than Earth? NASA came to that conclusion because of Mars' polar caps. When I was a kid I remember the consensus among scientists was that we were in an ice age. Made the cover of Time magazine even. Since they have talked about global warming for the last twenty years or better, that means within a decade scientists went from ice age to global warming.

How does that happen? Can man create such a warming? Only the Sun can. That explains the warming of Mars too, unless you believe Bush is warming Mars by lasers.

Most of these are too easy, but you get my point. I can play these games all you want. Gotta do better than this. Dividing our nation happened when the left cried about how Al lost the election with all of those silly allegations about how Bush stole it. Even Bill Maher admitted nothing illegal or wrong happened and he hates Bush. Those votes in Florida with the hanging chads were counted by the press.

According to the media who was in on the counting, Bush gained votes, not lost them. They probably wanted Gore to win in their count because that would have been a huge story. Bush gaining votes obviously wasn't. Who's not going to know? She even said she doesn't know whether or not she was undercover at that time.

Did you watch her testimony on Capitol Hill? Sorry, had to get to a few more. Carol, the info I got I found online which was done by the media research center. Glad you don't like the extremist views because a lot do.

Jesse Norman September 15, 2: Deep Throat September 15, We do agree on some things. You have a point. Personally, I take extremist comments with a grain of salt. I don't believe we had much choice but, to trust the President's decision to go to war based on what he and the media presented. If it's technically a war, a not is debatable. I don't know where you are getting your information but, I understood Moyer's to say that the D. At any rate, I don't believe anything should be based on surface value and find a complex world deserves better.

The transparency we often hear about and that is so desperately needed becomes the center when we turn away from lies and deception in times of desperation or otherwise. It starts with each of us me. September 14, 7: Finally we seem to agree on something Carol. There is another thread on here from a show done by Moyers about how the press was complicit in convincing the country in going to war in Iraq. Of course many people actually bought this. No one in the press was "afraid" to criticize Bush because they have done it from day one.

Is that a bad thing? No, of course not. But Moyers trying to convince people the press was Bush's right hand man is ludicrous. There's further evidence of the liberal bias in the media when Moveon. The Times gave some bs excuse as to why they did, but anyone with any keen sense could see through that.

Carol, your point to me beforehand was that the press wasn't honest. Which side were they going towards dishonesty? It would be the left wouldn't it? Obviously the NY Times weren't thinking of profits when it gave Moveon. Obviously the print media isn't thinking about profits since their bias has turned many away from buying newspapers.

Actually they can't resist themselves. Newspaper subscriptions are dwindling by the day. I don't think they really care about profits because their profits are down. I'm a realist and I don't try to see things just to validate my own opinion. I don't twist and turn things to suit my suspicions. I don't cheat myself with that kind of logical thinking.

MLM you said you were a republican for many years but hated the rhetoric of the right. Have you heard of the rhetoric on the left, which is by far worse than the right? What happened this week when democratic politicians accused the General of the same thing as the Moveon ad did was despicable. You had a compulsive liar in Hillary Clinton call an honored General a liar. Dems all over the place called him a liar after many sang his praises as they casted their vote. None of them dared to question Petraeus as to why he would lie and then soon send off his own son to Iraq.

When Bill Clinton was called a murderer by the far right over the death of Vince Foster, the republicans denounced it. How many times have you heard Bush called "a nazi" or "Hitler", yet the democrats are loudly silent.

Listen to the rhetoric on the left and see how it's NOT denounced. Wait til '08 and see the rhetoric on the left with a more powerful Moveon machine. You might have heard in the '00 election about how if you vote for Bush another black church will burn.

That will be nothing. When the american people see the rhetoric on the far left and see how it's not denounced by dems and vote for the republican, I really see Moveon.

They do say they have bought and paid for the democratic party. I have to agree with them. Jesse Norman September 14, 1: Blogs can be addicting but, please, pace yourself. I believe your input is quite valuable and wouldn't want to lose touch.

I believe that there are more that strive for the center are in more numbers than we've heard from or about. It gives me a sense of hope. Carol Huss September 13, 9: Today the press and the media have been consolidated into huge Corporations. The driving force is profit, shareholders, and stock prices. If anything they have all shifted to the right, because the right is completely pro business and deregulation.

One thing for sure, the idea that the media plays a valuable roll in keeping democracy in check is lost. The reason this blog appears so one-sided is that it seems to be the only place where this point of view can see the light of day. I am not excited about either party either. But not participating is NO option. My family heritage goes back, on at least three branches, to the 16 and 17 hundreds on these shores. Radical passionate individualism just runs in the family.

My political strategy at this point is to use my vote to try and bring the pendulum back closer to the center. MLM September 13, 9: Thanks for your comments, MLM. I'm glad you just took a break and weren't away for long. Sadly, I'm not very impressed with any of the politicians. Right now I don't see myself at any party affiliation. Facilitating the truth in for democracy and freedom takes a joint effort in diplomacy and understanding without deception. It is a process that requires civil contemplation and debate.

The occurances and exposure of that is, sadly, not a standard that is used enough today. We all have choices as well as responsibilities that must be addressed. Jesse, I don't know anyone is naive here except maybe the politicans, if they think the lies and deception will work for them, at least, in the long run.

Carol Huss September 13, 7: You know I grew up believeing this BS about the press. This is the debate that is truly irrelevant and trivial -- this seeking to demonize the opposition.

It is a totally non-productive debate that diverts the masses from debating the real issues that affect our lives. In order for America to work, it takes both the Left and the Right.

And, I say that not out of what I hear from the press but by the language of the automated phone calls and letters soliciting donations from the Republican Party. I was a card-carrying member until recently Also I receive this same rhetoric from my Republican representatives when they respond to my letters. Having been a conservative for 52 years, it is the Right Wing Rhetoric that has changed my viewpoint. Everything about the current regime is about shutting down debate by demonizing anyone that disagrees.

I have lived through total Democratic control and now total Republican control. I speak from my own experience, I personally have NEVER experienced fear that my fundamental constitutional freedoms were in jeopardy until today -- freedom of speech, separation of church and state which is the fundamental key to freedom of religion , freedom to be secure in my affairs under the 4th amendment.

I see all of these eroding into an Elitist Theocracy reminiscent of 18th Century England -- conservative vs. MLM September 13, 4: Well I'm not naive. I realize we don't live in Utopia where everything is at it seems or right. My friends think I'm actually quite savvy. Even the liberal ones. A lot don't like what I have to say, but they definitely respect what I say since they do know I know what I am talking about.

Hey, it's a gift. I know most on here won't agree with this, but the press mostly is left leaning. This story and others on PBS are just a small example.

I don't either because it never happened. MSNBC collected data on journalists who made donations from the through the start of the campaigns, gave to democrats or liberal causes while only 16 gave to republicans. When asked "generally speaking do you consider yourself a democrat, republican, independent, or something else? Foxnews does lean to the right. The only reason why they look so far right though is because everyone else leans left. No one would care if Foxnews leaned to the right except they are doing very well in the ratings.

See how I'm willing to admit Foxnews leans to the right? Will anyone else here admit most of the media leans to the left? Who's the naive one? Jesse Norman September 13, 6: What I would like to know is A new administration would at least give us hope for peace, if, and maybe if, we can show them by example. Carol Huss September 12, Jesse Norman September 11, Looks like they posted my comment afterall, only a day after I sent it. I'm sure some postings don't get through for whatever reasons but if you look at the other threads and it's at least against Bush or the war.

I've also seen the wackiest contributions on here as well. A lot of anti-Israeli sentiment, too. Yeah, blame the only civilized country in the region for protecting it's sliver of land against the continent scale lands of arabia. Didn't know you were dyxlexic. In my first post I did ask if you meant WWII and really didn't know what you meant about "freighting".

I assumed "frightening" but didn't know. I am sure your posts not getting uploaded is due to user error, the same has happened to my post and I never took it personally, as I have reposted from a word document and they uploaded just fine. Thank you for pointing out my typos, and obvious problem with dyslexia. I really appreciate that, so kind of you. I listened to him with my own two ears. He clearly connected the two and NO one would have made that connection with out the Bush propaganda.

But I am sure you hung on his every word and were able to catch his every speech. Show me the evidence that Saddam and Al Qaeda were connected, because the opinions and reports I have listened to say differently.

The nonpartisan analysis that seems most reasonable points out that Saddam saw Bin Lauden as a threat to his power, he was much too paranoid of a dictator to allow Al Qaeda to operate out of Iraq. In my opinion this rings true. Saddam was focused on two things, the local power play to control the Persian Gulf between Iran, Saudi Arabia and himself and his insane tribal hatred for his own citizens.

These two things are what prompted him to invade Kuwait, which prompted the first Gulf War. He wanted Kuwait because the other two major players control so much more coastline and this inhibits his ability to compete in shipping his oil.

Saddam was an insane, ruthless and evil character with no redeeming qualities. I am sure he is burning in hell. But, it is quite likely he never really had plans to attack the US, his neighbors for sure, but the US … his world was much, much too small. Oh and by the way, I never supported, liked or voted for Bill Clinton. In my opinion he is just another sleazy Politician who cannot control his behavior.

I have always agreed that he inherited the good economy rather than create it. Passing the looming crises on to Bush. This is why I defended Bush in the beginning. But, I also do not think that anyone, including the terrorist could have anticipated what actually happened — the two buildings collapsing. So blaming in hindsight is really not a productive thing to do. I still believe that if we give up our most basic freedoms we have let the terrorist win.

And I still believe this is what is happening. This administration response is DEAD wrong as far as I am concerned and rather that winning the war on terror we are just fanning the flames, giving justification to their hatred and feeding our own irrational fear.

I am really honest when I say I would rather die in another terrorist attack than to give up my basic liberty under the Constitution and live in a country that is not free. MLM September 9, 9: I guess I'll have to repeat what I tried to send earlier but wasn't posted. I think it was my nicest post too. Weird that I have read some postings calling Bush a murderer made it with no problem. No bias at all though.

It never happened, so what the poll shows is people will believe anything and certainly will believe what they want to believe. I can read postings here and say it's definitely not a one-sided flaw. What the Bush administration however said was there was a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda, which there was. It is evident from the documents we've recovered as well as the knowledge that Al Zarqawi was treated in Baghdad before the war.

As far as comparing war speeches go, you can do that with anyone. You have to be smarter than that. What are speeches that rally people to war supposed to sound like? It doesn't even have to be about war. I bet if I had to I can find similar statements from Reagan and Ghandi.

Were Ghandi and Reagan alike? What does 'freighting' mean? You lost me there. Hitler wasn't around in WWI either. I do strongly agree that the administration was very adamant about admitting mistakes, which made things worse. Rumsfeld was horrible and I celebrated the day he finally resigned.

If I had more money I might have even invited all of you. Okay, I wouldn't have. I've never done drugs and I don't want to get a contact high. I guess also Jay P. Jesse Norman September 9, 2: In an effort to rally support for a war, any speech will have similarities. That's just common sense. If I had to I could point out things how Reagansaid things that sounded like Ghandi. See, one can do that without comparing speeches on war, so that means nothing.

Were Reagan and Ghandi two peas in a pod? Did you mean WWII? Because Hitler wasn't anything in WWI. As far as the poll goes people will believe what they want to believe. What you accuse the administration of doing is simply not true. They did say there was a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda which was true. The more time went by the more documents were found linking them together.

Al Zarqawi was in Iraq before the war and received treatment on a wounded leg in Baghdad. There are other things linking Saddam with Al Qaeda which you can find on the net.

If anything the administration didn't differentiate one terrorist or terrorist organization from the other, which it shouldn't do. There are many with the same objective and there's no amount of appeasement that will make them change their minds. While I agree we should have concentrated more on getting Bin Laden, the status quo of the Iraqi situation was unacceptable.

The UN loved Saddam despite his crimes because they got money and cheap oil. Who are the real criminals? Who really should be impeached? Why does the UN even exist when it runs away from its own charter time and time again? My question for all of you is do you believe we should go into Darfur even if and when the UN says 'no, we won't do anything'?

Jesse Norman September 8, 2: Several people have objected to the comparison of this Administration and Hitler. I agree that this is a strong statement and of course has a strong element of hyperbole.

I in no way wish to say that the leadership in Washington even comes close to that level of insanity and evil. Still there are, I believe some freighting similarities, in the tactics and inflammatory rhetoric that have and continue to come from this Administration.

The use of fear for persuasion, the demonizing of opponents, the unwillingness to admit mistakes, the refusal to change the tone of this rhetoric even after it was made clear that the basis for entry was false…is what concerns me most.

Neither of which has been proven true. This belief was fostered by this Administration. This is clearly, in my opinion, cause for alarm. I cannot say why this Administration was so intent on attacking a country that, no matter how evil and corrupt it was, did nothing to provoke our attack. And posed no immediate danger to the US.

I am reading a book about WWI at the moment. In it are several quotes form Hitler, to me there are obvious similarities to the tactics used by this Administration to sell this War. The vector will not be asked afterwards whether he told the truth or not. When starting and waging war, it is not right that matters by victory.

MLM September 8, Jesse Norman September 7, Sorry, to intrude Jay P but, you might be over simplifying the situation. I'm glad the military study came out in the news today that we need to take "lighter steps" in Iraq and move closer to ending the war without occupation and it's a relief to hear from hearts that may be in the right place.

How the President responds seems to be the difference between him being able to then keep his job to the end of this term or not. It'll be interesting how it plays out. It also seems that the executive branch is watering down the responsibilities of the legislative and judicial branches as well Carol Huss September 6, 6: Jesse Norman Thanks for your comments. Let me ask you this, if this war was started so Bush and Co. Jay P September 6, 4: Jay P, where is your evidence of this?

You know what evidence is, right? I can make up stuff all I want too but just because I can come up with it in my mind, it doesn't make it fact. Please tell us if you were a fly on the wall when all of this was supposedly discussed. I'd be interested in reading it. I'm tired of all this "American imperialism" talk.

Name a country we have really taken over and kept. I don't recall ever hearing the saying "the sun never sets on america". If we went into Iraq because of oil, then how come oil is so high-priced throughout the world, not just in our country.

Why do I have a big chip on my shoulder because of Clinton? Because he was very corrupt and I'm sure hardly any of you actually accept that he was. The only thing he really got credit for was a good economy and that was falsely accredited.

He was just president at the right time with the internet boom. Just as he was leaving we had the internet bust. Al Gore should have gotten the credit for the economy since he invented the internet. Carol, you make a very good point. One side pits against the other almost like in a play. There's the good side and the bad side. Each side sees the other as the bad side, although I never heard Clinton compared to Hitler on the right like Bush has been nearly on a daily basis.

It's almost like it's a setup. While most of America is in the middle, both parties play to their bases and nothing gets done. They worry more about playing "gotcha" than solving our nation's problems. My points have been consistent that selective anger does nothing because both sides have it. When a president is elected, he will have selective outrage pitted against him.

That's the state of our country right now. If we left Iraq right now, what happened in Vietnam after we left would pale in comparison. You can argue whether or not we should have gone in and if we screwed up or not. Saying Bush lied though is delusional considering every democrat who said Saddam had WMD's along with every country in the world, Clinton, and Hans Blix must have been in on the lie. We all know that's not true I hope. Jesse Norman September 6, 1: It's obviously too easy to point fingers and take sides.

Does truth in democracy and freedom require that we choose either Democrats or Republicans? I'm glad the discussion goes on. As far as what the majority thinks or does about impeachment now or what was previously done remains to be seen.

Fighting a war is part of a process. There are battles won and lost, a journey. Is it our place to make Iraq a US occupation? The need for it remains to be seen. It's only then that will we find our destiny whether to end the war or not.

We have not found the necessary leadership with the UN? Discussion and Debate has it's purpose yet, let's not expect the required action to be proficiently done with too much delay.

Carol Huss September 5, 6: Jesse Norman You seem to have a big chip on your shoulder concerning Clinton. Why don't you focus on the present?

Jay P September 5, 4: Charles, who are the people? It seems like most of you think that the majority of the country wants impeachment. Maybe the majority of people YOU all know, but not the majority in the country. Selective outrage over corruption gets nowhere because it's just that, selective.

Clinton was the most corrupt of any President ever. Much more corrupt than Bush supposedly is. Clinton did so many things that people don't even remember the majority of them because the sheer number is too voluminous to take in. Clinton was said to have "a scandal a day". That was said by Jerry Brown who ran against him in for the democratic ticket.

It wasn't just about his affairs either. Why don't you all get mad at politicians on both sides who are corrupt? I reckon none of you. I contacted my representatives over this. I also contacted my representatives over the Tom Delay situation.

How much outrage was there among you when Gerry Studds had sex with an underage male page and then when re-elected received a standing ovation by the democratic caucus?

William Jefferson also received a standing ovation by the black congressional caucus. Where was the outrage? Democrats will say "well the people of Louisiana re-elected him. Let the process work itself out and see if he is convicted. Then he will be removed". Selective outrage means absolutely nothing because both sides have it. Jesse Norman September 5, 3: Based on all the most recent Presidential approval polls, most citizens would disagree with Rep.

Miller and the Democratic leadership. Now, of course, they claim they were ignorant of the facts leading to the invasion of Iraq. I wonder if they even bothered reading any of the many books and articles suggesting that the invasion of Iraq would be a horrendous mistake and that there was no justification for it. The Democrats have failed to bring an end to an illegal war, which they promised they would do.

They failed to restore our constitutional rights and they failed to bring the perpetrators of war crimes to justice. Rather than address these pressing issues, the Democrats focus solely on who will run for president in When we listen closely to what the candidates are saying we realize they have no plan to end the war.

Our sons and daughters are dying and being seriously wounded on a daily basis in what Rep. Miller admits is an unjustified war. Members of the legal profession and constitutional scholars have prepared the case. All the Democrats need to do is start the proceedings. Republicans will see which way the wind blows once the evidence is presented and they will be forced to act responsibly or lose future elections.

So what are the Democrats afraid of? They are afraid that if Bush and Cheney were removed from office, Nancy Pelosi would become president and have to deal with the real issue: Instead, they would prefer to allow the war to continue, blame the Republicans for the quagmire in Iraq and walk into power in In the meantime, the criminals are free to continue living the good life, while our soldiers continue to die and become disabled.

Smith September 1, 3: That is my point, Jesse, there is no place for complacency whether middle ground or not. Thank you for your integrity. I just see a lot of corruption in today's world and without firm, decisive actions in leadership or elsewhere like, at least, careful consideration of impeachment and possible removal from office of the President and others we are doomed to fail. We can do it by being diplomatic I do not have the gift of gab for a lot detail but, with intent as a generalist I can readily focus on the big picture.

Carol Huss August 28, You do not seriously think Clinton only lied about sex in the oval office do you? If Bill Clinton told you the sky was blue, I know you'd look up just to make sure, just as I would. I laid out many things Clinton did and could have listed many more, and they're undeniable. I won't get into Whitewater even though something wasn't right there, to me it's not an issue.

You don't think Clinton had Janet Reno stop those investigations that looked into his dealings on different fronts? Aren't those impeachable offenses? None of those I listed I would consider "Bush-friendly". Jesse Norman August 28, 7: For those who want to do something about impeachment: Sign the petition at http: Over , have already signed.

Dennis Kucinich has spoken out against the Bush administration's war on Iraq and now he is speaking out against war with Iran: There are more reasons than ever to impeach Cheney; many are afraid that he will do anything to pull us into a war with Iran. And for those who are wondering where the protesters are: There are ongoing protests -- a good place to start is: Stephanie August 28, Bush lied to the American people and the world about the reasons for waging war against another country that was of no imediate threat to the US.

Bush circumvented the 4th amendment and continues to put American citizens under surveillance with out warrant. I do not take impeachment lightly, impeaching Clinton In my opinion was politically motivated. But, in this case I think we are talking about our core freedoms under the constitution.

Impeachment was put in place by the founding Fathers as a last resort way for the people to correct the situation when the balance of power becomes so one sided that Democracy is threatened. It is my opinion we are at such a point in History. For me it is not about party bickering. This is about keeping American Democracy and Freedom alive. I agree we don't want to make this a trend. But that risk is a much less than the current one where the executive branch has more power than is cnstitutionally given or intended.

I actually supported Bush in the begainning. Was impressed with hearing him speak in person before the first ellection. And, I was taken in by the lies about Iraq for a while. But it is now clear that there was and continues to be a hidden agenda, one that I do not support.

MLM August 27,

Yehuda Berlinger per talent Casino Political Action Committee Funding Credits Pbs treatment for

The political action committee opposing a proposed casino in York County has launched a website fiercely attacking the controversial gambling developer who. PAC With Ties to China Joins Campaign For New Southern Maine Casino a new political action committee called Progress bid’s funding after Lisa Scott. He is not accepting money from political action committees towards public funding of · teacher's guide credits · synopsis.

Online Casino Advisory Free Games Slots Machines

2 HOURS OF PBS FUNDING CREDITS